New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

JVC HA-FXZ 100/200 - Page 170

post #2536 of 3171

[Delete]


Edited by bobeau - 2/15/13 at 5:50am
post #2537 of 3171
Quote:
Originally Posted by mochill View Post

^^^^ lol ....and yes sub bass added mid pulled back highs pulled back as well but not as much as the mids.

Thanks,

 

sounds like a basshead IEM.

 

While I love bass, too much is too much for my ears

post #2538 of 3171
Mids are foward but aren't recessed either , its has a warm texture to them which is kinda ok .using the fiio e11 truely bring them to life with beautiful mids , tighter bass and more bigger stage.
post #2539 of 3171
Not too much bass , but the most ultimate bass texture will ever hear. My fxz200 has a much tighter bass comparex to open box.
post #2540 of 3171
The fxz200 has impressed me so far.
post #2541 of 3171

ya after the 200 hr marker, well past it the bass isn't as boomy as it was out of the box or even at 100 hrs.  It sounds a bit more open to me.  

post #2542 of 3171

These IEM's make me not want to listen to my full size cans...And I have a pair of JVC DX1000's which have awesome bass.

post #2543 of 3171

The 200s make me not want to listen to the W4 anymore.. where is the bass? biggrin.gif

post #2544 of 3171
:O....WOW all you guys biggrin.gif
post #2545 of 3171
Sorry to repeat earlier questions, but I'm looking for a final answer here before ordering: how are the fxz100's with rock/metal? Do the drivers (especially the sub!) keep up with the speed or does it get a little muddy from time to time?

Really undecided between getting the Ortofon e-q5 or the fxz100. I know, very different sound signatures but I have no chance to audition them so need to figure out if these stay clear enough + give me the impact I look for.. the ortofon's would definitely be clear enough, but may lack a fun bottom end.. wink.gif

Also: how rediculous do they look in your ear? I'll be using them at work, so it would be appreciated if I don't look like a complete fool! biggrin.gif
post #2546 of 3171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exci View Post

Sorry to repeat earlier questions, but I'm looking for a final answer here before ordering: how are the fxz100's with rock/metal? Do the drivers (especially the sub!) keep up with the speed or does it get a little muddy from time to time?

Really undecided between getting the Ortofon e-q5 or the fxz100. I know, very different sound signatures but I have no chance to audition them so need to figure out if these stay clear enough + give me the impact I look for.. the ortofon's would definitely be clear enough, but may lack a fun bottom end.. wink.gif

Also: how rediculous do they look in your ear? I'll be using them at work, so it would be appreciated if I don't look like a complete fool! biggrin.gif

I have the Fxz200 and theyre not the most airy earphone but in sayubg that theyre not muddy either, perhaps just a bit dark in their presentation. Theres no lack of detail though.
post #2547 of 3171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exci View Post

Sorry to repeat earlier questions, but I'm looking for a final answer here before ordering: how are the fxz100's with rock/metal? Do the drivers (especially the sub!) keep up with the speed or does it get a little muddy from time to time?

Really undecided between getting the Ortofon e-q5 or the fxz100. I know, very different sound signatures but I have no chance to audition them so need to figure out if these stay clear enough + give me the impact I look for.. the ortofon's would definitely be clear enough, but may lack a fun bottom end.. wink.gif

Also: how rediculous do they look in your ear? I'll be using them at work, so it would be appreciated if I don't look like a complete fool! biggrin.gif

Exci, send me some link to music you listen and I'll try to compare the EQ-5 with the Fxz-100. I do not usually listen to Metal so.
post #2548 of 3171
Quote:
Originally Posted by dryvadeum View Post


I have the Fxz200 and theyre not the most airy earphone but in sayubg that theyre not muddy either, perhaps just a bit dark in their presentation. Theres no lack of detail though.

 

I don't mind a bit dark; I prefer the IE7 over the RE0, and the former is even somewhat veiled. It's just hard to believe that all that extra punch below 100Hz stays clear, so thank you for sharing!

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twinster View Post


Exci, send me some link to music you listen and I'll try to compare the EQ-5 with the Fxz-100. I do not usually listen to Metal so.

 

That would be great! Could you see how they handle the two below? That should get me enough reference.. :)

 

(1)

 

 

(2)

 

post #2549 of 3171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exci View Post

 

I don't mind a bit dark; I prefer the IE7 over the RE0, and the former is even somewhat veiled. It's just hard to believe that all that extra punch below 100Hz stays clear, so thank you for sharing!

 

 

That would be great! Could you see how they handle the two below? That should get me enough reference.. :)

 

That In Flames album is fantastic.

 

And if someone can check these songs for me that would be great:

 

 

 

 

 

 

I wanna hear this last song in the FXZ200s so bad!!

post #2550 of 3171
Caliban and in flames I likey biggrin.gif, don't forget about heaven shall burn- counterweight
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav: