New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

JVC HA-FXZ 100/200 - Page 11

post #151 of 3189
Thread Starter 

How's the sound?

post #152 of 3189
Quote:
Originally Posted by autumnholy View Post

How's the sound?

Hi autumnholy , apa khabar ?  great to see Malaysian member here . I am Malaysian too and I am from Penang but currently working in Singapore :-)

 

I play with my i5 and I only have klipsch s4 , original apple earpods , Munitio Nines and JVC HA-FX1X . What i can say is that this FXZ100 really sound diferent and is the best I heard so far :-) ksc75smile.gifatsmile.gif

post #153 of 3189
Thread Starter 

Hi greetings from Kuching.

 

Previously I have the Ha-fxt90, and I found it to be too treble happy for my ears. Can't stand the harsh, unrefined treble. Sounds thin to my ears. How about this fxz100? Heard currawong mentioned something about someone saying it's better than fxz200. Eyeing on either fxz200 or denon ah-c300 for a truly bass experience. That's why I wonder if fxz100 do inherit the treble happy nature of fxt90.

 

Thanks. inb4 fxt90 sounds great for some tracks.

post #154 of 3189
I've bought a watch from SeiyaJapan before, he's legit.

Idk about getting an IEM through him but watches are A-OK for sure.

edit: here's at least one early impression and review, but in Japanese

http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20121018_566904.html
http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/review/20121109_571156.html

translate makes it seem like they were pretty impressed

FXZ200 overall more warm
Edited by hauton - 11/24/12 at 11:27am
post #155 of 3189
Quote:
Originally Posted by hauton View Post

I've bought a watch from SeiyaJapan before, he's legit.
Idk about getting an IEM through him but watches are A-OK for sure.
edit: here's at least one early impression and review, but in Japanese
http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20121018_566904.html
http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/review/20121109_571156.html
translate makes it seem like they were pretty impressed
FXZ200 overall more warm

If you were to chose between the 2 (200 &100), which would you chose?
post #156 of 3189
Quote:
Originally Posted by WAYNENUMM View Post

 

The hype-train is slowly pulling out of the station!...

popcorn.gif

 

And when I said slowly, I meant it lol! Can't wait to see some reviews of these puppies!

post #157 of 3189

People be copying that JVC style already.

 

700

post #158 of 3189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dsnuts View Post

People be copying that JVC style already.

 

700

 

LOL!

post #159 of 3189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dsnuts View Post

People be copying that JVC style already.

 

700

I see JVC is getting on the celebrity endorsed headphone wagon also.  I love this new Herman Munster special edition.

post #160 of 3189

Yeah I pulled out of my first order, because they didn't have them stock like advertised. But now Amazon Japan Prime has them in stock. I'll probably order next Friday (just got the TDK IE800 dual drivers in - which I'm loving right now ), and will probably see the 1964 EARS V6 on Monday. So this train is slooooooow. Someone will probably beat me in ordering them at this point. I'm still debating if I will go for the 100 or 200 first. We'll see.

post #161 of 3189

Ok, so the fxz100 is best fit for speed and greart detail overall while the fxz200 has better tone in human voices and rich texture of instruments? I am confused.

post #162 of 3189
what has been said so far is that the fxz200 have more bass...
post #163 of 3189
Quote:
Originally Posted by vlenbo View Post

Ok, so the fxz100 is best fit for speed and greart detail overall while the fxz200 has better tone in human voices and rich texture of instruments? I am confused.

noone said that the tonality is better or worse on the fxz100 compared to fxz 200. Only thing that is known is that someone said that the frequency response in fxz100 is more balanced than on the fxz200 because fxz200 has more bass...

post #164 of 3189

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by nihontoman View Post

noone said that the tonality is better or worse on the fxz100 compared to fxz 200. Only thing that is known is that someone said that the frequency response in fxz100 is more balanced than on the fxz200 because fxz200 has more bass...

I got it from the site someone linked here. http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/review/20121109_571156.html But if the fxz100 is balanced then I'm all for the fxz100. Thanks for clarifying guys.


Edited by vlenbo - 12/1/12 at 1:59pm
post #165 of 3189
the differences are that the fxz100 has OFC cable, fxz200 has SPC cable with stiffer woofer material
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav: