Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › Themed Monthly Avatar Committee (TMAC) discussion thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Themed Monthly Avatar Committee (TMAC) discussion thread - Page 286

post #4276 of 11182
Quote:
Originally Posted by warrenpchi View Post

As long as no noobs are taken in by his poorly-made recommendations, it's more of a fly in the ointment kind of thing.

 

Yeah, nothing to get steamed up over. Head-Fi business as usual. I agree, though, that hopefully new members look around at other opinions, or at least understand that a zardak recommendation is best considered a snapshot in time. Taken in burst mode. biggrin.gif

post #4277 of 11182
Quote:
Originally Posted by warrenpchi View Post

As long as no noobs are taken in by his poorly-made recommendations, it's more of a fly in the ointment kind of thing.

which guy we tlakin about. 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by warrenpchi View Post

 

Boo too.  smile.gif

 

 

Actually, my fellow TMACians.  Today, we are faced with a mortal (i.e. irritatingly annoying) threat to the very fabric of existence.  It has been sighted, it has a name, and it must be properly educated so that it does not corrupt this paradise we have built for ourselves.  I am, of course, speaking of the one known as zardak.  I call upon all TMACians to visit the following

 

http://www.head-fi.org/t/656394/too-much-competition-what-headphones-should-i-get-for-100-180#post_9281358 (start the thread from that post on for maximum entertainment)

http://www.head-fi.org/products/ultrasone-dj1/reviews/8730

http://www.head-fi.org/products/ultrasone-dj-pro/reviews/8729

 

...and to do what is right, what must be done.  biggrin.gif

 

 

LOL, how is that possible?  biggrin.gif

omg. I almost did the same thing with the animu thread to the diary thread. 

post #4278 of 11182

I think I've discovered what the elusive "reference desktop amp/DAC" he mentioned in one of his reviews is: a FiiO E11 (mentioned at the end).

 

http://www.head-fi.org/products/shure-srh-550-dj/reviews/8546

 

Nothing to sneeze at, certainly, but his defensiveness about revealing this information (see the comments) makes it nonetheless amusing that a little unintentional detective work has short circuited his defenses.

post #4279 of 11182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Argyris View Post

I think I've discovered what the elusive "reference desktop amp/DAC" he mentioned in one of his reviews is: a FiiO E11 (mentioned at the end).

 

http://www.head-fi.org/products/shure-srh-550-dj/reviews/8546

 

Nothing to sneeze at, certainly, but his defensiveness about revealing this information (see the comments) makes it nonetheless amusing that a little unintentional detective work has short circuited his defenses.

Yeah, and the stuff he does mention can't be googled

 

Crystal Dynamics DAC??...DAFUQE?

post #4280 of 11182
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowei006 View Post

Yeah, and the stuff he does mention can't be googled

 

Crystal Dynamics DAC??...DAFUQE?

 

Yep it can - an example of one of Crystal Semi-conductor's DAC chips : http://bryston.com/products/digital_audio/BDA-1.html

 

That's high end.  They also do very budget implementations (Crystal not Bryston)

 

Until Zardak gives more info - there is nothing you can do.  My advice - ignore him.  He's on my block list.  Problem solved.  Anyone who claims the HD600 is rubbish shows true colours anyway.  It's OK to not like something.  But to suggest it's bad .......

post #4281 of 11182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brooko View Post

 

Yep it can - an example of one of Crystal Semi-conductor's DAC chips : http://bryston.com/products/digital_audio/BDA-1.html

 

That's high end.  They also do very budget implementations (Crystal not Bryston)

 

Until Zardak gives more info - there is nothing you can do.  My advice - ignore him.  He's on my block list.  Problem solved.  Anyone who claims the HD600 is rubbish shows true colours anyway.  It's OK to not like something.  But to suggest it's bad .......

 

Probably the best thing we can all do. Thanks for coming in and giving us the info, Brooko.

post #4282 of 11182

best dac= sexy dac. 

post #4283 of 11182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brooko View Post

 

Yep it can - an example of one of Crystal Semi-conductor's DAC chips : http://bryston.com/products/digital_audio/BDA-1.html

 

That's high end.  They also do very budget implementations (Crystal not Bryston)

 

Until Zardak gives more info - there is nothing you can do.  My advice - ignore him.  He's on my block list.  Problem solved.  Anyone who claims the HD600 is rubbish shows true colours anyway.  It's OK to not like something.  But to suggest it's bad .......

 

 

Wow, I guess typing in the whole thing won't work

 

Thanks

post #4284 of 11182
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowei006 View Post

 

 

Wow, I guess typing in the whole thing won't work

 

Thanks

your lame gifs= #1

post #4285 of 11182

All this Zardak talk....I can name worst offenders more than I have thumbs. If this is a competition for the most inane members on here he's still a bit behind.

post #4286 of 11182
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwinQY View Post

All this Zardak talk....I can name worst offenders more than I have thumbs. If this is a competition for the most inane members on here he's still a bit behind.

name him. Shame him.

post #4287 of 11182
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowei006 View Post

name him. Shame him.

But the bird is always watching.....eeep.

 

Although in this case I really do think what they're doing is a bit ban-worthy and worth checking out. But shouldn't slander unless I'm 100% sure and can back it up with legitimate evidence.

post #4288 of 11182
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwinQY View Post

But the bird is always watching.....eeep.

 

Although in this case I really do think what they're doing is a bit ban-worthy and worth checking out. But shouldn't slander unless I'm 100% sure and can back it up with legitimate evidence.

 

Yeah, it's probably not a good idea to keep talking about this stuff publicly (as fascinating as we all find it). That said, that's what PMs are for!

post #4289 of 11182
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwinQY View Post

But the bird is always watching.....eeep.

Although in this case I really do think what they're doing is a bit ban-worthy and worth checking out. But shouldn't slander unless I'm 100% sure and can back it up with legitimate evidence.
PM me?
post #4290 of 11182

AM me in the morning.....

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › Themed Monthly Avatar Committee (TMAC) discussion thread