See the thing about the 770 over the M50 is that it has an unusually wide soundstage. They are both V-shaped phones and the other thing I like about the 770 premium is the mids arent as recessed as the m50 to my ears. The 770 however isn't a can I can listen to at any high volume for long listening sessions unless I eq down the highs a bit but other than that I really enjoy them.
post #16 of 21
10/8/12 at 12:11am
- Doc-holliday
- Trader Feedback: +4
- Never did like custom titles.
-
- offline
- 2,220 Posts. Joined 7/2012
- Location: The O.K. Corral
- Select All Posts By This User
I have read a couple similar comments about variances with 770's also. I have the 770 premium version and compared to the m50 (that I just shipped off in trade) the bass is better in just about every category you could list. Better extension, impact and quality. The m50 to me is bass capable if you boost it but not as much as a basshead phone as people sometimes call it. I much prefer the 770 in this department.
See the thing about the 770 over the M50 is that it has an unusually wide soundstage. They are both V-shaped phones and the other thing I like about the 770 premium is the mids arent as recessed as the m50 to my ears. The 770 however isn't a can I can listen to at any high volume for long listening sessions unless I eq down the highs a bit but other than that I really enjoy them.
See the thing about the 770 over the M50 is that it has an unusually wide soundstage. They are both V-shaped phones and the other thing I like about the 770 premium is the mids arent as recessed as the m50 to my ears. The 770 however isn't a can I can listen to at any high volume for long listening sessions unless I eq down the highs a bit but other than that I really enjoy them.




















