Hi, people, thanks for the concern.
To answer the question about the LT, first I tried wiring it up to AC. This proved a pain to achieve physically, given that I had to contrive a resistive splitter to connect the ground to and get the soldering iron in through the later wiring to get at the valve bases. So I went back to the DC I had originally intended. I changed the cap in the filament supply to 22,000 uF. This improved the ripple by a factor of 10 to under a volt, where it should have been in the first place. The peak voltage was ~8.3V after rectification. ~0.7V ripple took this down to 7.6V. I designed and built a discrete low-dropout regulator, but I had some issues getting this to work, by this time I was pretty groggy due to the medication. Anyway, I started looking at the LM317 again, the dropout voltage is well below 2V at most temperatures, so I wired up 2 more LM317's with 1k2 and 5k1 resistors, which adds up to 6.3V and decided to let the dropout look out for itself.
Now I knew this part of the circuit was going to work OK, unlike the discrete regulator, so I wired it up on some perfboard and wired it in.
Then I left it for nearly 3 days until I got the nerve to turn it on. I knew I had put some dents in one of the HT caps when I took out the original cap for the LT supply, but I couldn't face stripping the heatshrink and substituting it, even though I had a spare. So eventually I turned it on and watched the tubes for any signs of serious problems.
When both heaters fired up, with no signs of distress on the plates, I measured the voltage on both the input and output jacks. When it turned out there was nothing much I decided to connect up some old 'phones and a source. The source is a Sony NW-E003 flash Walkman, known to be a bit quiet, and a pair of Koss K/20's which are quite robust.
Warm it up, turn on the Walkman, crank the volume, and there it is. Loud. But good. Although with an annoying tick, tick when turned down.
Here is the actual circuit as built:-
The big mistake I made with this build was the chassis.
In order to keep the cost down I looked at the first chassis on the site I was buying from, the chassis was 8 * 4 inches and 2 inches deep. I saw that the prices increased down the page, I though that the 8 * 4 would probably be acceptable and I went with it.
I ended up with a really tight build that was very hard to modify and fix when I had a few minor problems. Not really very smart considering it was a prototype.
It's only on going back to the site where I bought the chassis that I realize that the general trend on the page was rising prices going down the page, but it was only superficially true. I paid 11.80 euros but further down the page was a 10 * 6 inch chassis, 2 inches deep, for 11.20 euros. Not only cheaper, but with 60 square inches of floorspace as opposed to 32 square inches.
Anyway, now I want to rebuild the amp with a slightly different configuration I'm going to order up the larger chassis.
Although this will mean a bit of effort in marking up and drilling and punching another chassis (particularly the hole for the power connector), it will result in a much less cramped build with room for turret boards or tag strips, and it will be much easier to correct any problems or modify the design if I decide on a third iteration.
Here's the circuit as I'm currently thinking I will build it. I couldn't resist the symmetry of the 2 current sources.

It'll probably take me a few days to check the BOM, order up the parts and punch and drill the chassis. I'll get back to you when I've got some real progress to show.
w