Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › PC Enthusiast-Fi (PC Gaming/Parts/Overclocking)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

PC Enthusiast-Fi (PC Gaming/Parts/Overclocking) - Page 32

post #466 of 1861
1/18/13 at 9:20pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by gopanthersgo1 View Post


What are you running?!?

5770. I can run BF3 on high with 1080p

Reply

Head-Fi's Best Sellers

post #467 of 1861
1/18/13 at 9:22pm

Here's a quick and dirty comparison, using Saints Row The Third. My video card won't let me output higher than this resolution, but hopefully it'll let you see what you need to see. I'm uploading them in their raw form, so you can resize as you see fit without causing extra artifacting or anything.

 

2160x1350, 8xAA:

 

2160x1350, 2xAA:

 

1920x1200, 8xAA:

 

1440x900, 8xAA:

 

A different example.

 

2160x1350, 8xAA:

 

2160x1350, 2xAA:

 

1920x1200, 8xAA:

 

1440x900, 8xAA:

Reply
post #468 of 1861
1/18/13 at 9:25pm
Thread Starter 

I thin 1920x1080p did pretty well

Reply
post #469 of 1861
1/18/13 at 9:29pm

I would probably stick with 1920 and 8xAA. 2560 and 2xAA looked rather bad in comparison to the 8xAA of both 1920 and 2560. I kinda doubt this would be noticable in game, but if you have the power, put up the settings.

Reply
post #470 of 1861
1/18/13 at 9:32pm

Just make sure to resize them with photoshop or something. If you're sticking with 100% view size, or using your browser's zoom setting to get the images the same size, you might not be getting the proper quality comparison. If one of them is zooming to a weird size (like 64% or something), it's not going to properly crunch the jaggies, making them worse!

 

EDIT: A quick side-by-side.

 

The lower resolution, higher AA one definitely looks better.


Edited by Kukuk - 1/18/13 at 9:39pm
Reply
post #471 of 1861
1/18/13 at 10:30pm

Accidentally hit the "record video" button when playing Mafia 2, and took a few seconds of video, so I figured I'd upload it. tongue.gif

 

 

Recording at 2160x1350... It doesn't run all that poorly, actually. Just don't ask me to do any longer videos. biggrin.gif

Reply
post #472 of 1861
1/18/13 at 10:33pm
  • 3,569 Posts. Joined 3/2012
  • Location: B̴̨͍̞̯̯͚̙̯͈̘̙̮̰ͮ͗̔̒́ͪ͆̿̈́ͤ͑̽̔̅̇͟͞l̶̡̹̱͎̼̜̠̈ͥͨ̾̐̉͆̚͘͝ą̡̛̾ͣ͐ͫͩ͞͞...
  • Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kukuk View Post

Just make sure to resize them with photoshop or something. If you're sticking with 100% view size, or using your browser's zoom setting to get the images the same size, you might not be getting the proper quality comparison. If one of them is zooming to a weird size (like 64% or something), it's not going to properly crunch the jaggies, making them worse!

EDIT: A quick side-by-side.



The lower resolution, higher AA one definitely looks better.
I wonder if mine would look better at DS and 2x since I down sample mine from a higher rez. Also, Most games run 4x DS fine, with the exception of BL2 and SR3 so far... I really want a 680! tongue.gif

EDIT: I like the down sampled w/ 2x better than the non w/ 8x, look at the fence in the background, and the trees shadow.
Edited by gopanthersgo1 - 1/18/13 at 10:36pm
Reply
post #473 of 1861
1/18/13 at 11:53pm
  • 3,569 Posts. Joined 3/2012
  • Location: B̴̨͍̞̯̯͚̙̯͈̘̙̮̰ͮ͗̔̒́ͪ͆̿̈́ͤ͑̽̔̅̇͟͞l̶̡̹̱͎̼̜̠̈ͥͨ̾̐̉͆̚͘͝ą̡̛̾ͣ͐ͫͩ͞͞...
  • Select All Posts By This User

Arkham City with down sampling from 2560 x 1600 and 32x CSAA! biggrin.gif
Reply
post #474 of 1861
1/19/13 at 3:27am

Ooh, that looks nice. How does it run?

 

EDIT: Some more Crysis 2 shots.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kind of drives me nuts that I'm just shy of being able to run it in super high resolution. Still, it's nice to play at 40-45FPS like this, so I can't complain too much!


Edited by Kukuk - 1/19/13 at 3:36am
Reply
post #475 of 1861
1/19/13 at 9:42am
Thread Starter 

You guys. With your compy's/ Are terrible.

Reply
post #476 of 1861
1/19/13 at 9:48am
  • 3,569 Posts. Joined 3/2012
  • Location: B̴̨͍̞̯̯͚̙̯͈̘̙̮̰ͮ͗̔̒́ͪ͆̿̈́ͤ͑̽̔̅̇͟͞l̶̡̹̱͎̼̜̠̈ͥͨ̾̐̉͆̚͘͝ą̡̛̾ͣ͐ͫͩ͞͞...
  • Select All Posts By This User
I run Arkham at ~15 fps at that... I should have bought Crysis 2 for $10 the other day, but I had no money. frown.gif
Reply
post #477 of 1861
1/19/13 at 10:05am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by gopanthersgo1 View Post

I run Arkham at ~15 fps at that... I should have bought Crysis 2 for $10 the other day, but I had no money. frown.gif

I bought Crysis 1 for $1 by posing as an Australaian!!! heck yeah!

Reply
post #478 of 1861
1/19/13 at 10:26am
  • 3,569 Posts. Joined 3/2012
  • Location: B̴̨͍̞̯̯͚̙̯͈̘̙̮̰ͮ͗̔̒́ͪ͆̿̈́ͤ͑̽̔̅̇͟͞l̶̡̹̱͎̼̜̠̈ͥͨ̾̐̉͆̚͘͝ą̡̛̾ͣ͐ͫͩ͞͞...
  • Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowei006 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by gopanthersgo1 View Post

I run Arkham at ~15 fps at that... I should have bought Crysis 2 for $10 the other day, but I had no money. frown.gif
I bought Crysis 1 for $1 by posing as an Australaian!!! heck yeah!
Where at??? That would be fun! biggrin.gif I'd do that without getting Crysis for cheap!
Reply
post #479 of 1861
1/19/13 at 10:54am

Sleeping Dogs maxed out on everything except FXAA at 1080p with a custom SweetFX profile. Looks great, playable frame rates of mid 40s as well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reply
post #480 of 1861
1/19/13 at 10:55am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by gopanthersgo1 View Post


Where at??? That would be fun! biggrin.gif I'd do that without getting Crysis for cheap!

It was only for a few days

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tangster View Post

Sleeping Dogs maxed out on everything except FXAA at 1080p with a custom SweetFX profile. Looks great, playable frame rates of mid 40s as well.

 

 

 

They got Asia down pretty well :)

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home

Head-Fi's Best Sellers

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › PC Enthusiast-Fi (PC Gaming/Parts/Overclocking)