Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › PC Enthusiast-Fi (PC Gaming/Hardware/Software/Overclocking)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

PC Enthusiast-Fi (PC Gaming/Hardware/Software/Overclocking) - Page 32

post #466 of 6255
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by gopanthersgo1 View Post


What are you running?!?

5770. I can run BF3 on high with 1080p

post #467 of 6255

Here's a quick and dirty comparison, using Saints Row The Third. My video card won't let me output higher than this resolution, but hopefully it'll let you see what you need to see. I'm uploading them in their raw form, so you can resize as you see fit without causing extra artifacting or anything.

 

2160x1350, 8xAA:

 

2160x1350, 2xAA:

 

1920x1200, 8xAA:

 

1440x900, 8xAA:

 

A different example.

 

2160x1350, 8xAA:

 

2160x1350, 2xAA:

 

1920x1200, 8xAA:

 

1440x900, 8xAA:

post #468 of 6255
Thread Starter 

I thin 1920x1080p did pretty well

post #469 of 6255

I would probably stick with 1920 and 8xAA. 2560 and 2xAA looked rather bad in comparison to the 8xAA of both 1920 and 2560. I kinda doubt this would be noticable in game, but if you have the power, put up the settings.

post #470 of 6255

Just make sure to resize them with photoshop or something. If you're sticking with 100% view size, or using your browser's zoom setting to get the images the same size, you might not be getting the proper quality comparison. If one of them is zooming to a weird size (like 64% or something), it's not going to properly crunch the jaggies, making them worse!

 

EDIT: A quick side-by-side.

 

The lower resolution, higher AA one definitely looks better.


Edited by Kukuk - 1/18/13 at 9:39pm
post #471 of 6255

Accidentally hit the "record video" button when playing Mafia 2, and took a few seconds of video, so I figured I'd upload it. tongue.gif

 

 

Recording at 2160x1350... It doesn't run all that poorly, actually. Just don't ask me to do any longer videos. biggrin.gif

post #472 of 6255
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kukuk View Post

Just make sure to resize them with photoshop or something. If you're sticking with 100% view size, or using your browser's zoom setting to get the images the same size, you might not be getting the proper quality comparison. If one of them is zooming to a weird size (like 64% or something), it's not going to properly crunch the jaggies, making them worse!

EDIT: A quick side-by-side.



The lower resolution, higher AA one definitely looks better.
I wonder if mine would look better at DS and 2x since I down sample mine from a higher rez. Also, Most games run 4x DS fine, with the exception of BL2 and SR3 so far... I really want a 680! tongue.gif

EDIT: I like the down sampled w/ 2x better than the non w/ 8x, look at the fence in the background, and the trees shadow.
Edited by gopanthersgo1 - 1/18/13 at 10:36pm
post #473 of 6255

Arkham City with down sampling from 2560 x 1600 and 32x CSAA! biggrin.gif
post #474 of 6255

Ooh, that looks nice. How does it run?

 

EDIT: Some more Crysis 2 shots.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kind of drives me nuts that I'm just shy of being able to run it in super high resolution. Still, it's nice to play at 40-45FPS like this, so I can't complain too much!


Edited by Kukuk - 1/19/13 at 3:36am
post #475 of 6255
Thread Starter 

You guys. With your compy's/ Are terrible.

post #476 of 6255
I run Arkham at ~15 fps at that... I should have bought Crysis 2 for $10 the other day, but I had no money. frown.gif
post #477 of 6255
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by gopanthersgo1 View Post

I run Arkham at ~15 fps at that... I should have bought Crysis 2 for $10 the other day, but I had no money. frown.gif

I bought Crysis 1 for $1 by posing as an Australaian!!! heck yeah!

post #478 of 6255
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowei006 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by gopanthersgo1 View Post

I run Arkham at ~15 fps at that... I should have bought Crysis 2 for $10 the other day, but I had no money. frown.gif
I bought Crysis 1 for $1 by posing as an Australaian!!! heck yeah!
Where at??? That would be fun! biggrin.gif I'd do that without getting Crysis for cheap!
post #479 of 6255

Sleeping Dogs maxed out on everything except FXAA at 1080p with a custom SweetFX profile. Looks great, playable frame rates of mid 40s as well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

post #480 of 6255
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by gopanthersgo1 View Post


Where at??? That would be fun! biggrin.gif I'd do that without getting Crysis for cheap!

It was only for a few days

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tangster View Post

Sleeping Dogs maxed out on everything except FXAA at 1080p with a custom SweetFX profile. Looks great, playable frame rates of mid 40s as well.

 

 

 

They got Asia down pretty well :)

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › PC Enthusiast-Fi (PC Gaming/Hardware/Software/Overclocking)