Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › The diary entries of a little girl in her 30s! ~ Part 2
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The diary entries of a little girl in her 30s! ~ Part 2 - Page 339  

post #5071 of 21761
I'm wondering, for those that have heard/used/owned the MDR-7550, where can I go from there for similar signature and a bit more isolation than that.
post #5072 of 21761

That's a tough one lol. I've been asked this question before and really not sure what would be the same sound in another universal or Custom :). Maybe consider Westone 4 but they won't be the same per se. Both are on the neutral side though.
 

post #5073 of 21761

"That's not possible! She was sealed into the seventh obelisk, I was there at the prayer meeting."

I friggin love Doctor Who.

post #5074 of 21761
Quote:
Originally Posted by james444 View Post

On a slightly more serious note, I have a (non-furry) loaner unit of the Tera Player and it complements the Sennheiser IE800 perfectly. evil_smiley.gif

 

The friend who let me borrow his Tera Player also sent his ToGo 334 along, and I thought I'd share what I wrote to him today:

 

"Damn these are great IEMs! The refinement and smoothness in their midrange is stunning and even surpasses my UERM. And the best thing is, it doesn't come at the cost of detail, nothing gets smeared or glossed over, they just have an unoffensive and effortless way of presenting music in minute detail without sounding analytical in the least. It's been a while that I've had that LCD2 rev2 loaner I told you about, but from memory these two bear more than a passing resemblence to each other.


That said, like with the LCD2s, I personally would want a smidgen more treble presence and air from the 334s to fit my taste, and while the Tera Player can't work wonders on their highs, it takes the bass down by just the right amount to tilt their overall sound signature towards a better balance in my book.


So that's my interim result so far, one 'flawed' player and two IEMs that benefit greatly from said 'flaw' ;-) Things aren't always black and white, and your loaners are a prime example for that."


Edited by james444 - 1/26/13 at 3:05pm
post #5075 of 21761
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardgedee View Post

A large part of the reason why I want to try one before I buy. I'm ready to accept that any improvements will be incremental at best, but they still have to be significant somehow. And actually be improvements.

 

What DAC are you using now?  

post #5076 of 21761
Quote:
Originally Posted by driver 8 View Post

That full-name logo's pretty jarring.

 

I think if I get another pair of customs they'll be the freq-phased JH13's, but I don't use IEMs when it's cold out so there's no rush. 

 

I'm not sure how I feel about the NAD M51 yet.  There's a bit more detail than my old configuration, I think, but it doesn't feel like as big of a leap as I had hoped.  The treble weirdness I was talking about somewhere does seem to have subsided, though.  From what I've read on various sites it seems like I may have been hearing some aspect of sub-optimal Sabre use.  It's probably worth noting that I don't hear this with the Conductor, so maybe Burson was onto something with their decision not use all 8 channels.

 

 

What input are you using into the M51, and are you outputting via xlr? Which dac are you referring to that has the treble issue?

 

The NAD didn't really change with burn in. It sounded excellent out of the box and was more than a subtle improvement over the Gungnir. I do find quite a difference in sound between usb and optical, more striking than other dacs I've owned. Some people swear by hdmi, but I've yet to try that. My MBP has thunderbolt but I don't like the notion of having a thunderbolt to hdmi adapter in the chain.

 

Obviously the degree of difference between dacs will vary based on what you've upgraded from. Perhaps your path meant that the jump in quality between components was not as large as mine. Even if that were the case for me as well, the end result (i.e. an HD800 chain with little to fault) would have justified it.


Edited by olor1n - 1/26/13 at 4:38pm
post #5077 of 21761

PC -> Aqox USB Power Supply -> Stello U3 -coaxial-> M51, outputting via XLR to my Balancing Act.  I upgraded from the same configuration with a W4S DAC-2, whose treble sounded off to me. 

post #5078 of 21761

Forget that the leap isn't as big as anticipated. Does that chain now present, or get you closer to, what you wanted to hear from the HD800? Have you tried going straight into the M51 inputs (sans the converter)? I don't know about the effect of these converters but I've read elsewhere that some have preferred the sound without (not specifically in regards to the Stello).

post #5079 of 21761

Yeah, they do sound just a bit more coherent since I added the M51.  

 

I haven't tried it sans Stello yet.  I might actually try AES/BSU out of the Stello first since I've read that NAD has a preference for that input.  I don't have any reason to believe the Stello has much of a sound signature; adding it to the DAC2 just made things a bit cleaner. 

post #5080 of 21761
Quote:
Originally Posted by driver 8 View Post

PC -> Aqox USB Power Supply -> Stello U3 -coaxial-> M51, outputting via XLR to my Balancing Act.  I upgraded from the same configuration with a W4S DAC-2, whose treble sounded off to me. 

 

Driver 8, did the Aqvox USB power supply make a noticeable difference in your audio chain? I'm using my Stello U3 directly from the computer using a twin USB cable. I wonder if isolating dirty computer noise and feeding clean 5V would really make an improvement.

post #5081 of 21761

Yeah, I think so. There are cheaper ways to do what the Aqvox does that you may want to look into, though. 

post #5082 of 21761

Hey guys, how do closed back woodies sound compared to open phones in terms of sound stage? was thinking ath-w1000x. Really easy on the eyes.

post #5083 of 21761
Quote:
Originally Posted by driver 8 View Post

Yeah, they do sound just a bit more coherent since I added the M51.  

I haven't tried it sans Stello yet.  I might actually try AES/BSU out of the Stello first since I've read that NAD has a preference for that input.  I don't have any reason to believe the Stello has much of a sound signature; adding it to the DAC2 just made things a bit cleaner. 

So nad m51 was more coherent than W4S dac2? I'm using AudioGD's top sabre dac at the moment, I want to try out the m51. I could probably order it next week but I want to sell my He6 first so I don't eat into my savings. I also want to try wireworlds top usb cable and bel canto's new usb transport. I feel like getting the m51 first though in case they decide to change the aussie rrp.
post #5084 of 21761

Am I alone in thinking that the new Harley Quinn figurine that Square Enix is releasing looks way to....well demented industrial gangland goth?

Don't get me wrong it looks like a very nice detailed figurine but come on that's not the Harley I grew up with in the comics. The Arkham Asylum video game Harley was rather neat but this one gives me mixed feelings.


Edited by DigitalFreak - 1/26/13 at 8:37pm
post #5085 of 21761

^Reminds me somewhat of Cassie Hack from the Hack/Slash comics. I prefer the old Harley.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
This thread is locked  
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › The diary entries of a little girl in her 30s! ~ Part 2