Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › The NEW JVC HA-S400. Affordable Carbon Nanotube cans for the masses.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The NEW JVC HA-S400. Affordable Carbon Nanotube cans for the masses. - Page 80

post #1186 of 1461
Quote:
Originally Posted by talelxpx View Post

So guys after reading here about them

do you think theyre better than AKG k430/450,ATH-Sj55, or any foldable headphones around the 50$ price?

Yup

post #1187 of 1461
Quote:
Originally Posted by shockdoc View Post

Yup

 

You said it nicely in 1 word,friend.

I will order them today hopefully they will arrive till end of this week or next sunday.

Thank you.

post #1188 of 1461
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenF View Post


WS55 made them sound hollow
it made them sound better
post #1189 of 1461

Had the 400's now for several days.  All I can say is WOW!  Current config is K581DJ pads with paper towels and masking tape on the ports.  I love this combination (and they only have about 30-40 hours of burn time on them!).  Simply AMAZING for $26.  Well, about $34 with the pads.

post #1190 of 1461

I just picked these up as a replacement for my Senn PX100s. Very nice sound, especially for the price. They aren't up to where the PX100s are, well not yet anyway. They are similarly dark and are lacking the slam of the Senns, however I do not hear The Veil. Most importantly for me is that the highs aren't fatiguing. The sub bass is unreal. I'm definitely looking forward to hearing how these settle down. A great find.

post #1191 of 1461

I have a pair of SR80s and wondered if it would be worth getting these. How do they compare? Also, how tightly does the S400 clamp? (I've seen varying opinions in this thread)


Edited by quadtec - 6/22/13 at 2:29pm
post #1192 of 1461
Quote:
Originally Posted by quadtec View Post

I have a pair of SR80s and wondered if it would be worth getting these. How do they compare? Also, how tightly does the S400 clamp? (I've seen varying opinions in this thread)

 

Can't comment on the SR80's.  However, regarding the clamping force, I don't have any problems on the sides of my head (and I have a fairly large head).  What I do have a problem with though is discomfort on the top of my head.  The padding is quite firm on the head band.  I have to take them off after about 30 minutes and rub the top of my head a minute or two.  To me, it's just a minor inconvenience. 

post #1193 of 1461

Can't speak specifically to the SR 80's but I have an old pair of SR 100's. To me these do seem to clamp a little bit tighter but that could be due to them being new and the SR 100's having open foam ear pads (more give than the rather hard pleather stock pads). And slowpickr is right about the dearth of padding on the headband. For some reason, though, adding the HM5 ear pads makes them easier to wear for extended listening for me at least.

post #1194 of 1461
Quote:
Originally Posted by quadtec View Post

I have a pair of SR80s and wondered if it would be worth getting these. How do they compare? Also, how tightly does the S400 clamp? (I've seen varying opinions in this thread)

I'd say that for a $25 headphone that they are at least a good a value as the SR80i are for their price. And I love my Grados smily_headphones1.gif

I have a pair to use at the gym (can't take my Grados). Work great as a set of portables. I haven't noticed the clamping force to be any worse than my other portables.
post #1195 of 1461

Sorry to bump up an old thread (didn't want to start a new one), but how is the clamping force on these? I need a tight earpad headphone for gym duty. It pretty much just needs to stay on my head on a treadmill. My other considerations were porta(sporta)pro or the sennheiser behind the neck active thingies.

 

If anyone has any other recommendations, I like my cans musical. I also think its a good sign when headphones make me blink when the music hits hard. Hate sibilance and distorted highs. Thanks in advance.

post #1196 of 1461

FWIW these clamp fine but I don't like them at the gym because the overhead music is too loud and these don't isolate like good IEMs. The highs on these are very very good PROVIDED you burn them in LONG and HARD!

post #1197 of 1461
Quote:
Originally Posted by shockdoc View Post

FWIW these clamp fine but I don't like them at the gym because the overhead music is too loud and these don't isolate like good IEMs. The highs on these are very very good PROVIDED you burn them in LONG and HARD!


Probably a good thing, I hate being shut out from the rest of the world. 

post #1198 of 1461

They clamp well enough. My big ears aren't very happy with the on-ear pads, but going with over-ear pads doesn't make sense to me, since I got these because I wanted something portable and bigger pads would kind of defeat the purpose.

 

Mine sounded sweet right out oft he box. I don't really understand what benefits will come with burning them in.

post #1199 of 1461

Different ears I guess. Mine were harsh and smoothed out after about 200 hours (yes I said 200 hours) of hard D&B. I've heard of others liking the sound on arrival but mine were...well, just harsh.

post #1200 of 1461
Quote:
Originally Posted by cel4145 View Post


I'd say that for a $25 headphone that they are at least a good a value as the SR80i are for their price. And I love my Grados smily_headphones1.gif

I have a pair to use at the gym (can't take my Grados). Work great as a set of portables. I haven't noticed the clamping force to be any worse than my other portables.

 

So in terms of value for money they're the same, but what about purely the sound quality? Grados blow them out of the water?

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › The NEW JVC HA-S400. Affordable Carbon Nanotube cans for the masses.