Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › How would the Beats Solo HD compete if they were $110?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

How would the Beats Solo HD compete if they were $110?

Poll Results: Would they be good?

 
  • 5% (1)
    Good
  • 83% (15)
    Bad
  • 11% (2)
    They would be alright
18 Total Votes  
post #1 of 13
Thread Starter 
I would like to know because I've heard people say the new Ncredible NTune sounds just like the Solo HD except the only difference is the NTune is a little less than half price.
post #2 of 13

solo's sound slightly worse than a sennheiser hd202, which is $30. so... their price should be no higher than $30.
its just that bad,and for the studios about $60 


Edited by streetdragon - 8/25/12 at 11:53pm
post #3 of 13

Ok so both the NCredible and Solo HD's are terrible headphones. If you have 110 to spend get the ath-m50, they have good bass not over powering and a great overall can for only 110. Stay away from the Beats line ( unless you can get the pros for cheaper than the MSRP they are the only decent headphone in that line).

post #4 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kosmik Panda View Post

Ok so both the NCredible and Solo HD's are terrible headphones. If you have 110 to spend get the ath-m50, they have good bass not over powering and a great overall can for only 110. Stay away from the Beats line ( unless you can get the pros for cheaper than the MSRP they are the only decent headphone in that line).

this. i thought the m50 was $150 by the way? where can you find it for $110?

post #5 of 13
post #6 of 13

http://www.innerfidelity.com/content/inexpensive-and-terrific-noontec-zoro i advice you to read through this article by Tyll also, this a very good option according to him

post #7 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by streetdragon View Post

this. i thought the m50 was $150 by the way? where can you find it for $110?

I saw them on amazon not long ago for around 110$

post #8 of 13
50bucks max..... No more than that.
post #9 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickdohc View Post

50bucks max..... No more than that.

not even my $30 imo, at that price i could get the HD202

post #10 of 13
Thread Starter 

Those don't bump though I'm talking about vs other bassy headphones which correct me if I'm wrong but there aren't any in the $30 price range

post #11 of 13
Htf600. Not a bass monster but there is a lot of bass. 30.00
post #12 of 13
Thread Starter 

Too bad they're ugly, why does every good cheap headphone have to look bad :\

post #13 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilboozy View Post

Too bad they're ugly, why does every good cheap headphone have to look bad :\

 

 

so, you want a good looking headphone, that has better bass than the beats  looks better , for $30. bucks?


biggrin.gif

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › How would the Beats Solo HD compete if they were $110?