Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Tralucent Audio 1Plus2 IEM Impressions Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Tralucent Audio 1Plus2 IEM Impressions Thread - Page 257

post #3841 of 5633

334's bass decay isn't that slower. I wouldn't say its not as controlled... just bit hot I suppose.

post #3842 of 5633
The thing is, we all hear things so differently, there's so many variables it's amazing anyone agrees on absolutely anything here for most parts. I without a doubt see more disagreeing on these boards.


I found 1plus2 bass terrible, very bloated, loose and terribly slow, much prefer the low end on my Phillips SHE9700.
post #3843 of 5633
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by H20Fidelity View Post

The thing is, we all hear things so differently, there's so many variables it's amazing anyone agrees on absolutely anything here for most parts. I without a doubt see more disagreeing on these boards.


I found 1plus2 bass terrible, very bloated, loose and terribly slow, much prefer the low end on my Phillips SHE9700.


lol ;)

post #3844 of 5633

Mind = blown.

post #3845 of 5633
Quote:
Originally Posted by H20Fidelity View Post

The thing is, we all hear things so differently, there's so many variables it's amazing anyone agrees on absolutely anything here for most parts. I without a doubt see more disagreeing on these boards.


I found 1plus2 bass terrible, very bloated, loose and terribly slow, much prefer the low end on my Phillips SHE9700.

Haven't been following the thread, but I assume this is a joke biggrin.gif

post #3846 of 5633
We all do hear things differently. The majority of people I've asked to try the 1plus2 werent as impressed as when they tried my 334.
post #3847 of 5633
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisceriousZERO View Post

We all do hear things differently. The majority of people I've asked to try the 1plus2 werent as impressed as when they tried my 334.

I would be one of those people. Tried em 2 weeks ago.

post #3848 of 5633
there are alot of factors like source, music genre, fitting that contribute to the results.

from what i hear,
1p2 bass decay is 'slightly slower', i like it as i can feel the bass more than my um3x. but 1p2 bass attack is fast n natural. the bass squirts in n flows out.
post #3849 of 5633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ra97oR View Post

Finally demoed the 1+2 with the gold+silver cable.

 
Hard to fault sound, with a dark signature yet sibilant on some songs. Great soundstage with natural imaging, mids are well detailed and never masked by the ever presence of the bass. Somewhat longer than usual bass decay, IMO.

I must say, my major concern is not the sound but the build and comfort. Isolation is also sub-par, maybe because of the vented design. Visible air bubbles in the shell and less than polished finish, very different the the MH334's craftsmanship. The thick and heavy cable made the non custom fitted ear tips a hassle to get a good seal. Considering a TG334! is cheaper and MH334 is not that far off if available, it just isn't competitive enough with great value IEMs like the ASG2 around.

YMMV

Correct, the TG334 is different to the 1plus2 and it last for less than 10 minutes whenI audition at Jaben and I never miss it. The source was the Tera
Edited by flymetothemoon - 8/26/13 at 4:47pm
post #3850 of 5633
For my ears, TG!334 is my preferred over the stock 1Plus2.

However 1Plus2 with Uber is preferred over the TG!334.

In both cases, the TG!334 is with its standard 001 cable.
post #3851 of 5633
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnakChan View Post

For my ears, TG!334 is my preferred over the stock 1Plus2.

However 1Plus2 with Uber is preferred over the TG!334.

In both cases, the TG!334 is with its standard 001 cable.

Agreed and not agreed.

That's very much depends on the source and personal preference. That's why I stated clear that Tera was my reference source, and my impressions on the 334 was solely referred to using Tera as source. Other fellow headfiers might find 334 is better than the 1plus2 when using other DAPs (AK120?).

Cheers,
post #3852 of 5633
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie0904 View Post


... the bass squirts in n flows out.

Man will always be man...thoughts like these never leaves him..biggrin.gif
Edited by Audiowood - 8/26/13 at 8:02pm
post #3853 of 5633
Quote:
Originally Posted by flymetothemoon View Post

Agreed and not agreed.

That's very much depends on the source and personal preference. That's why I stated clear that Tera was my reference source, and my impressions on the 334 was solely referred to using Tera as source. Other fellow headfiers might find 334 is better than the 1plus2 when using other DAPs (AK120?).

Cheers,
Yes, I know. That's why I said "for my ears".

I personally find it very hard to pair the Tera. I like the Tera more with DD drivers...not so much hybrid, nor BAs only.
post #3854 of 5633
Quote:
Originally Posted by H20Fidelity View Post

The thing is, we all hear things so differently, there's so many variables it's amazing anyone agrees on absolutely anything here for most parts. I without a doubt see more disagreeing on these boards.


I found 1plus2 bass terrible, very bloated, loose and terribly slow, much prefer the low end on my Phillips SHE9700.

 

a joke? a morning joke? biggrin.gif

 

ok, since this is confessions day i confess my iPod Shuffle sounds much better compared to RWAK and C3, i cannot help thinking how better Shuffle is, someone please tell Apple. i also like its minimalistic UI basshead.gifbiggrin.giftongue.gif


Edited by Gintaras - 8/26/13 at 11:33pm
post #3855 of 5633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bokyung View Post

Mind = blown.

 

not blown but bloated darthsmile.gif

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Tralucent Audio 1Plus2 IEM Impressions Thread