or Connect
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Sound Science › Cafe Sceptico: The Objectivist Cafe
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Cafe Sceptico: The Objectivist Cafe - Page 28  

post #406 of 497

Yeah. Errors usually result in plainly audible and sometimes quite annoying glitches.

 

To those saying that bits can flip.. well yeah, the most significant bit is as likely to flip as the least significant, the former causing huge distortions (worst case are clicks/pops) to the waveform.

post #407 of 497
Thread Starter 

I found a nice PM in my inbox when I got back from my "involuntary vacation" from HeadFi. I thought I'd share it. It really made my day...

 

Hi BigShot,

 

I just want to say thank you for your honest and objective comments at Headfi. I did some careful research myself and have to agree with most of your comments.

For example, I also came to the following conclusions:
1) human ears are usually the limiting factor in "Hifi";
2) 256 AAC VBR is good enough for music listening by most (if not all) human ears;
3) most, if not all, "hi-end" DACs are overkill for music listening.

I am glad that Headfi still has you around. Thanks to your posts, I learned and saved a lot. Now I realize that I made quite some mistakes before. Shame on myself; I have a PhD in science but have not investigated those audiophile myths objectively until a year ago (I probably even propelled some groundless claims before).

post #408 of 497

Welcome back!

 

The oddity is that the "objective" Head-Fi crowd is actually fairly diverse in terms of prior education and experience. As an "SS" consensus emerges I see it as proof of a common pragmatism.

 

Bigshot, I think a lot of people have a respect for your experience and a willingness to share what you've learned in a simple and straightforward manner. But then there is also another contingent of contributors...

post #409 of 497
Here here! A toast to bigshot! Welcome back sir smily_headphones1.gif
post #410 of 497
Thread Starter 

Who knows? If Caesar gives me thumbs down again, I may be forced to join the lions in the colosseum again. But that's OK because a bad penny keeps turning up, doesn't it?

 

(I love mixed metaphors!)

post #411 of 497

Welcome back!  

 

I did notice your absence, glad it was only "virtual", and sorry it was involuntary.  Always best to move forward.

 

And always remember, you can lead a gift horse to water, but you can't look him in the mouth. 

post #412 of 497
Welcome back, bigshot. You were missed, and it's great to see your banning wasn't permanent.
post #413 of 497

Welcome back Bigshot!

post #414 of 497
Thread Starter 

Thanks youbee!

 

...and I still dare anyone to hear a difference between AAC 320 and lossless at a normal listening volume and EQ curve! I've never seen it done.


Edited by bigshot - 5/28/13 at 4:37pm
post #415 of 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigshot View Post

Thanks youbee!

 

...and I still dare anyone to hear a difference between AAC 320 and lossless at a normal listening volume and EQ curve! I've never seen it done.

 

How 'bout upping the ante to a double dog dare? biggrin.gif

 

se

post #416 of 497

I just got the latest Mapleshade catalog in the mail! I'm savoring every page biggrin.gif

post #417 of 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigshot View Post

Thanks youbee!

 

...and I still dare anyone to hear a difference between AAC 320 and lossless at a normal listening volume and EQ curve! I've never seen it done.

I'd guess many people would say they could hear a difference because hearing, of anything, is very subjective. There are clearly measurable differences in bit rates and stuff like that, but are the differences such that normal hearing people can discern them?

 

How do I determine what someone else is hearing (and I'm an objectivist)? 

post #418 of 497
Thread Starter 
DBT!
post #419 of 497
Thread Starter 
A recent thread here has led me to an epiphany. I realized that people who consider themselves "subjectivists" are probably more sensitive than other people. They feel things more strongly and that is why our discussions of "sound science" make them lash out. They're in pain, but all they really want is to be allowed to "own" their subjective belief. I'm fine with that. Everyone doesn't have to be a "sound science" person. Everyone doesn't have to agree. I'm going to make a point to give them the gentle reinforcement that the things they believe are OK. I think we could all get along better if we were more accepting of different belief systems.

I think it's worth a try at least.
post #420 of 497

I could gladly admit to these same folks that there are things yet to discover in "sound science"...

 

However, I do not appreciate the efforts given by some of their ranks to twist this truth into a rallying-cry against any-and-all attempts to present an objectified view as an alternative.  Some refute objectivity as a valid (or even preferable) viewpoint with such fervor, it makes me wonder if the quintessential debate has not devolved into a pseudo-religious war.

 

I'm glad to see you have survived mostly unscathed, Bigshot.

Welcome back... and good luck convincing a majority of "subjectivists" to provide a semblance of reciprocity.

 

Truly, I hope they may come to see us in a similar light some day...

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Sound Science
This thread is locked  
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Sound Science › Cafe Sceptico: The Objectivist Cafe