Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › [New] Philips Fidelio X1
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[New] Philips Fidelio X1 - Page 58

post #856 of 1491
2/3/13 at 2:58am
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraconiaN View Post

How *good* does the Fidelio X1 sound compared to my HD 650? I haven't heard it yet.

Me interested in it too.

Reply

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #857 of 1491
2/3/13 at 11:31am

I prefer the sound of the X1 but when I owned the HD650, I might not have had the proper gear to scale them to the level it deserved.  As for the X1, it is very easy to drive.  

Reply
post #858 of 1491
2/4/13 at 1:56pm
Has any reviewer published an impedance graph for the X1?
Reply
post #859 of 1491
2/4/13 at 2:05pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Impulse View Post

Has any reviewer published an impedance graph for the X1?

Yea it should be somewhere here in the topic. Use the search function ;)

Reply
post #860 of 1491
2/4/13 at 2:10pm

I just got a pair of well burned in X1s in exchange of some Amperiors I didn't like all that much. So far  I am liking what I hear,   but I find the mids a tad recessed for my liking and would like to get a little bit more micro-detail if possible. I am thinking of upgrading the cable to either solid OCC copper or solid Silver (non OCC), materials for cables offered by a Spanish maker  that are within my budget.  For which of the materials do you think I should go? If any.  Thx and sorry for my English. 


Edited by andkoppel - 2/4/13 at 3:09pm
Reply
post #861 of 1491
2/4/13 at 2:29pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by HolyCheese View Post

Yea it should be somewhere here in the topic. Use the search function wink.gif

Think you can point me in the right direction? Searches for impedance curve or graph come up empty and most of the initial reviews I've seen (like Headfonia's...) are very subjective and devoid of any measurements, hence went I asked...
Reply
post #862 of 1491
2/4/13 at 7:05pm
http://www.lesnumeriques.com/casque-audio/philips-fidelio-x1-p14348/test.html
Reply
post #863 of 1491
2/4/13 at 7:08pm
Not feeling that spike at 9khz. I was hoping it'd be a smoother alternative to the DT990...



More sub bass which is awesome, and less mid bass bloat, but that treble... looks like a harsh/sibilant prone headphone.

Still, that linearity after the sub bass seems VERY desirable. Looks like an EQ to lower 9khz by a few decibles will make the X1 quite a potent headphone.
Edited by Mad Lust Envy - 2/4/13 at 7:16pm
Reply
post #864 of 1491
2/4/13 at 7:21pm
Ok, now I wish I hadn't quit French after three years... tongue.gif The treble spike's something I wasn't expecting based off the subjective reviews out there, hmm...
Edited by Impulse - 2/4/13 at 7:24pm
Reply
post #865 of 1491
2/4/13 at 8:43pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Impulse View Post

Ok, now I wish I hadn't quit French after three years... tongue.gif The treble spike's something I wasn't expecting based off the subjective reviews out there, hmm...

I doubt its that bad.

Reply
post #866 of 1491
2/4/13 at 8:45pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Lust Envy View Post

Not feeling that spike at 9khz. I was hoping it'd be a smoother alternative to the DT990...



More sub bass which is awesome, and less mid bass bloat, but that treble... looks like a harsh/sibilant prone headphone.

Still, that linearity after the sub bass seems VERY desirable. Looks like an EQ to lower 9khz by a few decibles will make the X1 quite a potent headphone.

 

Graphs and real life listening experience are two different domains in my experience. You need other types of measurements also.

I have listened to headphones that by the graph should be bass heavy/light or harsher in the treble that in reality where neither.

Reply
post #867 of 1491
2/4/13 at 9:11pm
Oh, I know, but it gives a general idea as to what to expect. The DT990 graph is definitely on par with what to expect with it's sound (I've owned....many 990s... like 7.) The X1 graph indicates some good sub bass, followed by linear response up to it's treble, which indicates a lot of sparkle at 9khz.
Reply
post #868 of 1491
2/4/13 at 9:48pm
I was hoping for something more similar to my M-80, but with a larger sound stage, or something close to the HE-400 I guess (ergonomics there are a tough sell for me tho). We'll see I guess... They need to release them in the US already, gah.
Reply
post #869 of 1491
2/4/13 at 11:28pm
I'm very sensitive to sibilance but I can easily listen to these cans for hours.

And for the recessed mids, I agree. But after more time with them you (I) get used to it.
Reply
post #870 of 1491
2/5/13 at 3:09am
Quote:
Originally Posted by andkoppel View Post

I just got a pair of well burned in X1s in exchange of some Amperiors I didn't like all that much. So far  I am liking what I hear,   but I find the mids a tad recessed for my liking and would like to get a little bit more micro-detail if possible. I am thinking of upgrading the cable to either solid OCC copper or solid Silver (non OCC), materials for cables offered by a Spanish maker  that are within my budget.  For which of the materials do you think I should go? If any.  Thx and sorry for my English. 

I have tried them with Five 9's OCC copper , Four 9's solid silver and currently my favourite is Seven 9's OCC silver plated cryo treated.  There is not so much difference between the solid silver and the high purity copper silver plated but the copper multistrand is a much more flexible cable which suits better the rather flimsy 3.5mm jack socket as it has  less strain on it.

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › [New] Philips Fidelio X1