The JVC HA M750's were my first "real" pair of headphones. Previously, I had just used iPod headphones and cheap 10 dollar headphones from my local grocery store. As such, I was very impressed by...
Introduction
The ASG-2 is Aurisonics' second (official) foray into the world of iems. The guys over at Aurisonics cater primarily to the music professional crowd, and their products are...
My opinions
Sound
The sound produced by the HD558 is rich, a bit light, and isn't bloated with bass which is a good thing. It has a crisp treble and punchy bass, very great...
Introduction
In the past 2 years VentureCraft has been successfully creating amps and DAC/Amp packaged components with their GD-03, Go-DAP 4.0 for iPhone 4(s), and Go-DAP X for their...
Depending on the quality of the laptop's output (for most laptops, it's poor relative to what else is available these days, though not particularly poor compared to what was available in the past, devices other than DACs)...
the difference would be great enough that many here would consider the difference significant. I'd caution that audio forums tend to be full of hyperbole.
Try running the iPod Classic through the NAD 3020 and home setup to compare, hopefully being careful to match the output levels from the laptop and iPod closely. If you're sure the laptop sounds worse, then you can clearly get an upgrade (under $100 is no problem for a competent DAC).
I did what you said, comparing the iPod's hp-out with the laptop's (since I don't have a female-female converter to connect my iPod's line out with the 3.5mm... ), and while the mids on the laptop seem a bit more recessed and the seperation slightly weaker, the difference wasn't drastic. I may consider an upgrade further down the line, but for now I get to save a bit of money!
I did what you said, comparing the iPod's hp-out with the laptop's (since I don't have a female-female converter to connect my iPod's line out with the 3.5mm... ), and while the mids on the laptop seem a bit more recessed and the seperation slightly weaker, the difference wasn't drastic. I may consider an upgrade further down the line, but for now I get to save a bit of money!
Just making sure I understood you, but you were testing headphones directly from the iPod and laptop?
That would be testing the ability to drive headphones as well as do the digital-to-analog conversion. Often times, effects and problems from the digital-to-analog conversion are smaller than those from driving the headphones; this wouldn't at all be a fair test of the laptop's D/A compared to what something else might do in that regard.
In other words, expect differences no larger than what you actually heard.
That could still be worth an upgrade; again, it's up to you.
No, I was amping the headphone-out from the two respective sources. Sorry about the confusion. But yeah, if I did that the difference would be even greater, wouldn't it.
I might consider a low cost DAC just to see what the difference would be, but I'm afraid that cheaping out on the DAC would be a waste of money. But if any of those DACs listed above are decent, then I guess I shouldn't be afraid!