Lol i have 3 windows of that bassdrive thing all playing at once XD Should work well for burning in though.
Featured Stories
Topics Discussed
Related Forum Threads
- ++ FULL-SIZE HEADPHONE RECOMMENDATIONS THREAD++ i.e. Don't start a new thread: ask for... Last post on Today at 4:29 pm in Headphones (full-size)
- The NEW JVC HA-S400. Affordable Carbon Nanotube cans for the masses. Last post on 5/19/13 at 11:35am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Beating a dead horse... Need advice - DT770 80ohm vs. AT M50 Last post on 2/18/13 at 3:26am in Headphones (full-size)
- OVER-PERFORMING, OVER-ACHIEVING Headphones/IEMs for their price range. Top cost effective cans/IEMS Last post on 4/4/13 at 5:41am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Just got a pair of Monoprice 839 Last post on 2/4/13 at 9:49pm in Headphones (full-size)
Related Articles
-
Grado Modification Overview
Edited on 9/27/11
- Headphone Impedance
Edited on 8/18/12- Buying Guide Headphones By Price Range
Edited on 10/26/12- A Hopefully Helpful Headphone Buying Guide For Newbies By Boomana
Edited on 1/6/13Related Head Gear
Recent Reviews
-
Introduction I’m a basshead. I say that loudly and proudly, even though some folks believe basshead and audiophile are mutually exclusive. Obviously, I’m not in that camp. But sometimes, I...
-
I read reviews on this and I said let me try this out, for $10 I couldn't lose. This surpassed all of expectations for a $10 IEM. I am going to purchase a set for my wife, she was also blown...
-
Fanmusic is a distributor and a brand of Chinese audio-equipment which also has an eBay store. I was contacted by Tony, their manager a while ago and he informed me that they were working...
-
Very nice amp for mid-fiers to entry high-fiers. The sound quality and specs are very good for the price. Works very well with Jazz and Classical music in particular (not that rock and...
-
My pair was a supposed demo model from one of Hifiman's retailers. They came in mint condition, which is lucky for me. I'm not using a balanced cable yet, but I already feel it's a good upgrade...
The JVC HA-S500.. Appreciation, fan thread. - Page 103
post #1531 of 64519/23/12 at 9:27amGear mentioned in this thread:
post #1532 of 64519/23/12 at 3:40pm- rickdohc
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 961 Posts. Joined 6/2012
- Location: Panama, Central America
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
I am not sure they are better than the Beyers DT1350 for the asking price they surley are better and more refined, but the s500 is way better than yor KSC75. Mines are gathering dust. They sound tiny, lifeless.post #1533 of 64519/23/12 at 3:52pm- rickdohc
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 961 Posts. Joined 6/2012
- Location: Panama, Central America
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:Originally Posted by cel4145Â
Granted, I haven't tried any of the pad swapping, but I think you guys are comparing apples to oranges. The sound signature of the stock S500 is quite different from the M50. I agree that the S500s are great for $80, but then I'm not as enamored of them because I listen to them a little bit and then just want to put on my HFI-780s. The 780s have a similar warm lower mid sound and are just overall more engaging in multiple ways. The 780s and S500 are more of an apples to apples comparison.
Hi Cel. I am comparing stock pads on the s500. Its lacking clarity on the m50 compared to the S500. The bass is strong on both.
Dont get me wrong. Its a very good HP but IMHO and for me, i like the S500 over the m50. Maybe i am getting used to the jvc sound signature, but i am not missing my m50.post #1534 of 64519/23/12 at 3:55pmAfter reading this thread, buying the headphone and listening to the headphone, I can definitely say that we have a winner here! JVC really has made something incredible that is quite affordable given what it does.
post #1535 of 64519/23/12 at 4:20pm- cel4145
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- online
- 1,945 Posts. Joined 12/2011
- Location: Grand Rapids, MI
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:Originally Posted by rickdohcÂ
Hi Cel. I am comparing stock pads on the s500. Its lacking clarity on the m50 compared to the S500. The bass is strong on both.
Dont get me wrong. Its a very good HP but IMHO and for me, i like the S500 over the m50. Maybe i am getting used to the jvc sound signature, but i am not missing my m50.Yeah. See I haven't noticed any clarity difference, although I haven't done much head to head comparison. But certainly the mids are much forward in the S500, although the bass seems a little more defined on the M50. But because of the heavier mid presence, I can definitely see why some people would like them betterÂ
post #1536 of 64519/23/12 at 4:57pm- rickdohc
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 961 Posts. Joined 6/2012
- Location: Panama, Central America
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:Originally Posted by cel4145Â
Yeah. See I haven't noticed any clarity difference, although I haven't done much head to head comparison. But certainly the mids are much forward in the S500, although the bass seems a little more defined on the M50. But because of the heavier mid presence, I can definitely see why some people would like them betterÂ

Whe completly agree, some will find the M50 better , some the 500 for those reasons.
I just did a ABCD tets,
. Xb500,700,htf600 and S500 and iam gettig consufed here, out of nowhere the s500 is competing in bass impact and quantity with better quality, BUT this things are not bass monsters!! Or they are??? The HTF600 bass is weak, the sony series is more muddy and way less refined, but the bass impact on the s500 is almost or even harder on the s500
Its like some type of hybrid of bass monster but with quality bass and the mids foward, jezzz strange HP
Edited by rickdohc - 9/23/12 at 5:04pmpost #1537 of 64519/23/12 at 5:14pm- cel4145
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- online
- 1,945 Posts. Joined 12/2011
- Location: Grand Rapids, MI
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:Originally Posted by rickdohcÂ
I just did a ABCD tets,
. Xb500,700,htf600 and S500 and iam gettig consufed here, out of nowhere the s500 is competing in bass impact and quantity with better quality, BUT this things are not bass monsters!! Or they are??? The HTF600 bass is weak, the sony series is more muddy and way less refined, but the bass impact on the s500 is almost or even harder on the s500Â
One reason might be because of their sensitivity. Are the other headphones that sensitive? The tendency could be to end up with 'em louder when you switch them over, which would give them an advantage. Supposedly very small db changes in SPL can bias outcomes in speaker AB testing. I always have to turn them down a lot when I compare them to something else. LOL
post #1538 of 64519/23/12 at 5:26pm- rickdohc
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 961 Posts. Joined 6/2012
- Location: Panama, Central America
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:Originally Posted by cel4145Â
One reason might be because of their sensitivity. Are the other headphones that sensitive? The tendency could be to end up with 'em louder when you switch them over, which would give them an advantage. Supposedly very small db changes in SPL can bias outcomes in speaker AB testing. I always have to turn them down a lot when I compare them to something else. LOL
Yea maybe, i have to crank the volumen on those, but it doesnt thelp them that much on mids and highs, Yea these are not bass monsters but bass is not lacking for sure.
EDIT. Triple checked, yes. The s500 is more sensitive than the others, if i am listening at 70% on the s500 i need to cranck the xb's at least 85%. Thanks CEl for that observation.
Edited by rickdohc - 9/23/12 at 5:36pmpost #1539 of 64519/23/12 at 6:35pm- analogsurviver
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 844 Posts. Joined 7/2012
- Location: On the sunny side of the Alps
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:Originally Posted by cel4145Â
Â
One reason might be because of their sensitivity. Are the other headphones that sensitive? The tendency could be to end up with 'em louder when you switch them over, which would give them an advantage. Supposedly very small db changes in SPL can bias outcomes in speaker AB testing. I always have to turn them down a lot when I compare them to something else. LOL
Level matching is mandatory if meaningful results are to be obtained. Rather hard to do with headphones in practice . I use 1 kHz sine wave  for reference and try to get as equally loud signal from both phones under test as possible - but that does not always give the loudness phones have with music. Some kind of artificial head would be better - objective measurements are more reliable than subjective impressions, but performance of transducers, imperfect as they still are, can not be assesed by objective measurements alone.Â
Â
JVC HA-SA 500 change both spectral signature as well as "appearent sensitivity" with different earpads. These differences exceed 1 dB and can lead to false results if not corrected for. They also have above average sensitivity - when merely swapping another lower sensitivity and HA-S50o without re-adjusting the volume setting , HA-S500 will be "better" simply because they are louder.
Â
For instant A/Bing, preferably two amps of the same type, each driving a single pair of phones with preadjusted volume setting(s) should be used, driven from the same source using Y cables/splitter.Â
post #1540 of 64519/23/12 at 6:53pm- rickdohc
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 961 Posts. Joined 6/2012
- Location: Panama, Central America
- Select All Posts By This User
Ok, i tried with the volumen way more lower on the S500, still its no contest, s500 wins hands down, the bass impact is hard and with better quality. Not a bass monster, could be a good thing, but with enough bass. So if i sell them i will not miss them.
Edited by rickdohc - 9/23/12 at 6:54pmpost #1541 of 64519/23/12 at 7:11pm- analogsurviver
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 844 Posts. Joined 7/2012
- Location: On the sunny side of the Alps
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:Make no mistake, I consider HA-S500 superiour to most headphones - it was meant in general terms, not with HA-S500 particularly in mind. Usually level matching is more important once HA-S500 are compared to >>> $ (and hopefully quality... ) phones - here the differences should be getting ever smaller and level matching does gain in importance by the appropriate amount.
Â
Consaidering selling already? Comfort issue IIRC ? Care to elaborate ?
post #1542 of 64519/23/12 at 7:32pm- rickdohc
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 961 Posts. Joined 6/2012
- Location: Panama, Central America
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:Originally Posted by analogsurviverÂ
Make no mistake, I consider HA-S500 superiour to most headphones - it was meant in general terms, not with HA-S500 particularly in mind. Usually level matching is more important once HA-S500 are compared to >>> $ (and hopefully quality... ) phones - here the differences should be getting ever smaller and level matching does gain in importance by the appropriate amount.
Consaidering selling already? Comfort issue IIRC ? Care to elaborate ?
Hi analogdude.
You are completly right, i just made another test with s500 volumen much lower, i used Erick Clapton Change the world, in second 13 Erick hits an armonic with hes finger, all the others headphones even the ksc75, the armonics sounds dull and not detailed, with s500 you can hear the texture of the note and it is reproduced very good, sounds more real.
No, i am not selling my s500. I was refering to the other phones. No way i am selling my s500
Unless that new apple earbud is that good as people are reviewing them, would like tomhear DS comments on them.post #1543 of 64519/23/12 at 7:38pmJVC needs to hurry up and make super-comfy big 50mm versions of these carbon nanotube drivers already!!Â
post #1544 of 64519/23/12 at 9:08pmI just listened to this with my s500's. SO EPICÂ
post #1545 of 64519/23/12 at 11:48pm- Doc-holliday
- Trader Feedback: +4
- Never did like custom titles.
-
- offline
- 2,220 Posts. Joined 7/2012
- Location: The O.K. Corral
- Select All Posts By This User
Finished my re-cable. And i said I would post the results but I got to thinking. From the last time I listened to the time i finished I don't think it is a fair test to go saying it sounds better because I don't believe anyone has that good of hearing memory over a few hours time with a subtle change like a recable. Anyway I feel like there is improvement but why wouldn't I after I went through all the trouble. All I CAN say is the cable I posted yesterday made of the same materials which I CAN do an A/B test is certainly noticable.
That being said. Instead I thought I would share some of the pics from the recable process:
Braided 4 strands of 24awg silver plated OFC. Then used a drilled die as a Y. Twisted the 2 conductors to each cup. Used braided jackets.

Driver removed.
Shows how thin the stock wire is to the replacement.
Had to melt the hole to make it a bit bigger to fit the jacket with the 2 conductors.
Buttoned up.
Pads back on.
Done deal.
Was really a lot of fun. Coulda been nicer I think but good for a first go. I recommend to anyone who has any interest and is a cabling noob (like myself) to do it as a project because they are easy to take apart and the soldering pads on the drivers are real easy to access and nice and big. And if you mess it up...... at least they are 70 dollars and not 350 dollar or more cans.Return HomeBack to Forum: Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors- The JVC HA-S500.. Appreciation, fan thread.
Gear mentioned in this thread:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › The JVC HA-S500.. Appreciation, fan thread. - Headphone Impedance
Recent Discussions
- › [REVIEW] Aurisonics ASG-2 Hybrid IEM (Stealth) - Sennheiser IE800... 14 seconds ago
- › The NEW JVC HA-S400. Affordable Carbon Nanotube cans for the masses. 1 minute ago
- › Themed Monthly Avatar Committee (TMAC) discussion thread 2 minutes ago
- › Koss ESP/950: At wits end 2 minutes ago
- › The NEW WS99/WS77 PG 57.. 2 minutes ago
- › Sonic Satori - HRT Levels the Field with the MicroStreamer 3 minutes ago
- › Considering removal of DACMagic from system and using XONAR STX in... 4 minutes ago
- › Full-sized headphone that does metal decently? 5 minutes ago
- › Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro - Limited Edition, 32 Ohms 6 minutes ago
- › IC: Audio Technica W3000ANV 7 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › AUDIO TECHNICA ATH PRO700 mk2 by TheGame21x
- › Monoprice 8320 IEM by Taharqa
- › Fanmusic MS-E1011 by ItsMeHere
- › Audio-gd NFB-5 by citadel
- › HE-5LE by JamesHuntington
- › Kozee Sound Solutions Infinity X2 by Insight Reviews
- › JVC HA M750 by tinamou62
- › Aurisonics ASG-2 by eke2k6
- › Sennheiser HD-558 by Tr1ckster
- › Go-Dap DD Socket1 (DD/DA Converter) for iPhone & iPod... by AnakChan
New Articles
- › Syncing music and making playlists work with... by Currawong
- › Mac OS X Music Players - alternatives to iTunes by miceblue
- › STAX SR-007 (Omega II) ... A Review After 4... by Currawong
- › List of lossless and high-res music (FLAC,... by ffivaz
- › Beware of the following scams and people... by Currawong
- › Sennheiser 449 Mod Possibly 4 8 Mod by hernan604
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Computer Audio) by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Portable... by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Desktop Audio) by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Headphone... by joe
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map


























