What's the difference in multiple BA earphones between active and passive crossover?
Related Forum Threads
- Help finding IEMs or headphones under $800. Big soundstage, rich vocals, slightly sparkling highs Last post on 9/9/12 at 9:13am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Help out with some custom IEM Last post on 8/19/12 at 7:27am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- I'm going to try some customs... Last post on 6/19/12 at 7:19pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Lost my Westone 3 IEM, now looking for recommendation on something new Last post on 6/11/12 at 10:30pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
Last edited: 8/18/12
- Buying Guide Headphones By Price RangeLast edited: 10/26/12
- A Hopefully Helpful Headphone Buying Guide For Newbies By BoomanaLast edited: 1/6/13
- Top Tier Universal Iem Comparison Chart And InformationLast edited: 5/7/10
- Basic Guide To In Ear CanalphonesLast edited: 3/22/12
Passive vs. active crossoverpost #1 of 117/31/12 at 5:39amThread Starterpost #2 of 117/31/12 at 6:04ampost #3 of 117/31/12 at 6:38amThread Starterpost #4 of 117/31/12 at 7:34am
A passive crossover is what is generally used in BA phones or standard home speakers. An active crossover is an external component piece. Google Rane active crossover.post #5 of 117/31/12 at 9:13am
passive crossovers use resistors, capcitors, choke coils to create the frequency and attenuation level of the crossover be it high pass (from X number UP) or low pass (from X number below) at a slopew of -6 dB, -12dB, -18dB and -24dB per octave.
Active crossovers do all this in the digital realm. Instead of changing values for capacitors and choke coils, depending on crossover, you press a button up or down to change crossover frequency and slope (changing values in the DSP code). The Rane Digital crossover has a fixed 24 dB slope but can adjust crossover frequency along with subsonic (below 20hz) and Ultrasonic (above 20Khz) filters. The active cross over has to do an A/D conversion than a D/A conversion unless fed a digital signal.post #6 of 117/31/12 at 10:17am
Active can used passive componenets in front of the amp stages as well. Active simply means that the amp is not driving a crossover and is directly connected to a driver. This alows a wider range of options for parts that aren't required to handle current and allowing direct control of an easier load (driver) by the amplifier.post #7 of 117/31/12 at 10:56amQuote:Originally Posted by goodvibes
Active can used passive componenets in front of the amp stages as well. Active simply means that the amp is not driving a crossover and is directly connected to a driver. This alows a wider range of options for parts that aren't required to handle current and allowing direct control of an easier load (driver) by the amplifier.
An ACTIVE crossover (the operative word is Crossover) HAS NO (meaning, none, zero, zilch, nada, zip, donut) PASSIVE COMPONENTS. Regardless of what JH Audio says as that is what you are eluding to.
In short, JH-3a is a PASSIVE system with 3 independant amplifiers per crossover (lows, mids and highs). No different than any other system out there that has a crossover for low, mids and highs. that does not constitute an active setup.post #8 of 117/31/12 at 4:25pm
I love Internet experts. You are absolutely wrong and my comment had nothing to do with JHA. For instance. http://www.head-fi.org/t/613417/unique-melody-platform-pure-6-6-driver-custom-iem-dac-active-crossover-and-amp Active crossovers have been around forever, as in before DSP. You still split frequencies with passive components in the gain stage in front of the amplifier. Any splitting of frequencies before the amp stage constitutes active. Because active crossovers often have gain stages to adjust level, the analog ones use typical RC passive networks as the filter portions within or between stages. As long as the network is impervious to load in or out and the amp output is directly connected to the driver terminals, it's active. Don't know exactly what JHA is doing but I think I read that it's a bit of both including bits AFTER the amp so I didn't reference them for a reason. (It's a different discussion but are the semantics of what JHA doing that big a deal is it gets the desired result?) I was just pointing out that it would be prohibitively expensive for most.
Edited by goodvibes - 7/31/12 at 4:42pmpost #9 of 117/31/12 at 6:17pm
Figgie you are being misleading as well, no, all active crossovers are not digital. Many these days are, but not all of them.
And GoodVibes, in order for it to be an active crossover, it has to use active components, typicaly opamps. I dont think there are any examples of someone putting a passive crossover before the amplifier, it wouldnt work, since the driver is almost always part of the crossover networkand couldnt be in a setup like thatpost #10 of 117/31/12 at 9:49pm
If you look in an old active crossover it can have a passive network between 2 simple gain stages and sometimes just one if it's for a specific load (amp set). In theory, if you know both the source impedance is low enough and amp input parameters (impedances and gain which is what the variable gain stages are for) a purely passive setup can be used before the last amplifier stage though it's better to keep things tidier. There are active crossovers on the market today that don't use op amps or DSP. Transistors and passive components to set slope and frequency. Now you may induce the amp to help along buy building a slope via the feedback loop etc but it's done with passive components, almost always with some in the signal path. When I said within gain stages in my earlier post, that's what I was referring to.
FM acoustics uses passive networks between two linear gain stages in their active network for instance which goes to my original option. It counts and that's all I said. I didn't limit active crossovers to passive networks either as I never even hinted that DSP and EQ via a feedback loop wasn't fine as well. All I said is that it wasn't limited to DSP and can use passive networks, as long as they're before the amp stage. That is absolutely true and in no way misleading. There are always amps involved and there will be slopes either within their circuit or before them.
Of course a crossover in front of an amp works. You need more than one amp and put a high pass in front of the tweeter amp and a low pass in front of the woofer amp but you need to know the impedances and gain involved etc. Vandersteen woofers used to come with a small box and that has a couple caps in it to be used in front of the amp. The value is chosen by knowing the amplifier input impedance and works as a 1st order high pass for the main speaker pair. The input impedance of the power amp would take the place of the driver in the network so you'd be picking values for 20K or so instead of 20 ohms. It allows the value of the cap to be 1000 times smaller and the voltages to be 50 times smaller so that better parts can be used under less duress and if designed well, the amplifier still has the type of control, damping and dynamics that you can't get without a direct driver connection.
We can talk semantics but what I said is correct and "An ACTIVE crossover (the operative word is Crossover) HAS NO (meaning, none, zero, zilch, nada, zip, donut) PASSIVE COMPONENTS." is ridiculously strong to be so wrong as was the JHA fanboy assumption.
Edited by goodvibes - 7/31/12 at 10:41pmpost #11 of 119/19/14 at 7:49pm
So, I don't even know what JHA is. Also I just noticed that this post was from two years ago, but I made an account to reply to this so I'm just gonna do it. EDIT: I also realized GoodbVibes is basically saying what I'm saying. I won't get upset if the mods take this down as I'm not adding any new information.
Since we want to not bother with petty semantics: crossovers are circuits. That's it. They're a couple of low/high/band-pass filters of varying order depending on the design. They are not "special" compared to any other filtering circuit. Like I said, I don't know what JHA is. It's not even fair to say I'm any kind of audiophile. I like good-sounding setups, but I'm nowhere near any "real" audiophile level.
In electrical engineering, circuits which feature ONLY PASSIVE components are called passive circuits. Circuits which feature ANY ACTIVE components -- namely transistors or diodes -- are called ACTIVE circuits. Suggesting that an active circuit features ONLY active components is ludicrous...an operational amplifier on its own is FULL of resistors which are PASSIVE components, paired in different configurations with a bunch of transistors.
Any crossover circuit which features any active components is an active crossover circuit. The ONLY way for something to be a passive crossover is for it to not have any active components. Crossovers on unpowered speakers, for example, are passive, otherwise you would need to feed external power to the speaker in order for it to function correctly.
While I'm on this topic, active does NOT imply digital. Not even a little bit. Yeah, you can have a digital setup, and since any kind of digital processing takes place on an IC full of transistors this means it would definitely be "active," but "active" on its own has NOTHING to do with analog or digital. Active filters are often analog circuits. Actually, filters and amplifiers, especially when you need them for very sensitive applications, are some of the main reasons why analog circuit design continues to be a highly active area of EE despite the huge amount of popularity in digital. Generally there are a lot fewer people doing analog, and those people tend to get paid a lot, because they're absolutely necessary and the topic can be quite difficult.
Edited by Acfeiln - 9/19/14 at 7:58pmReturn HomeBack to Forum: Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Passive vs. active crossover
- Buying Guide Headphones By Price Range
- › Violectric HPA V281 - Vorsprung durch Balanced 35 seconds ago
- › Rhapsodio – A force to be reckoned with 58 seconds ago
- › XMOS XU208 USB BRIDGES - THE LATEST GEN HAS ARRIVED! 1 minute ago
- › Audeze SINE Series 1 minute ago
- › New Dragonfly Black and Red Discussion 1 minute ago
- › NEW: Tralucent Audio Plus5 BA IEM 2 minutes ago
- › Shure SE846 Impressions Thread 4 minutes ago
- › Comparisons: 30 of the Top Closed/Portable Headphones Around 5 minutes ago
- › Earbuds Round-Up (Update: April 17th, 2016) 5 minutes ago
- › Three Word Story 6 minutes ago
- › Venture Electronics (VE) Monk+/Monk Plus by Aornic
- › T-PEOS RASIEL by mark2410
- › Sound Blaster E5 - 24-bit/192kHz High-Resolution USB DAC &... by vapman
- › NuForce HEM6 Reference Class Hi-Res In-Ear Headphones with Triple... by Hi-Fi EDU
- › SHOZY Zero IEM by jant71
- › Alpha & Delta D2 by BloodyPenguin
- › Beyerdynamic T90 Premium Stereo Headphone by glennkresge
- › Unique Melody Miracle V2 Universal six driver in-ear monitor by Hisoundfi
- › 1MORE Triple Driver In-Ear Headphones with In-line Microphone and... by MMansell
- › Philips SHE3595WT/28 In-Ear Headset with Mic White by stweb
- › Flawless Album Suggestions
- › The Audiophile Scene in a Third World Country...
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide,...
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide,...
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide:...
- › Chord Mojo FAQ
- › Head-Fi Logo Gear
- › All about iPod Touch 6G as digital transport
- › List of major HiFiMan HE1000 reviews,...
- › Can I change my user name? Can I delete my...