What's the difference in multiple BA earphones between active and passive crossover?
Related Forum Threads
- Help finding IEMs or headphones under $800. Big soundstage, rich vocals, slightly sparkling highs Last post on 9/9/12 at 9:13am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Help out with some custom IEM Last post on 8/19/12 at 7:27am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- I'm going to try some customs... Last post on 6/19/12 at 7:19pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Lost my Westone 3 IEM, now looking for recommendation on something new Last post on 6/11/12 at 10:30pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
Last edited: 8/18/12
- Buying Guide Headphones By Price RangeLast edited: 10/26/12
- A Hopefully Helpful Headphone Buying Guide For Newbies By BoomanaLast edited: 1/6/13
- Top Tier Universal Iem Comparison Chart And InformationLast edited: 5/7/10
- Basic Guide To In Ear CanalphonesLast edited: 3/22/12
Ah, yes. The SE215, quite possibly the most popular entry-level IEM on the market at the moment, and for good reason. These headphones are perfect for any budding audio enthusiast thanks to its...
Shure has definitely outdone themselves with this wonderful product. Never have I experienced more clarity in a pair of IEMs. For someone who listens to alternative rock, pop, and an assorted array...
Videos only at the moment. I'll do a write-up later. Apologies if you were hoping for something to read. Unboxing and design details: More details about the cables, sound and possible...
Introduction – Read Heath Audio (or RHA for short) are soon to release their latest and greatest earphone, the T10i. Much like the rest of RHA’s products, the T10i’s were designed to offer premium...
I've owned an EarMax and Sennheiser HD 580's for 20 years, so I'm already familiar with tubed OTL headphone amps. The linestage of my old Quicksilver started developing some noise, and I didn't...
Passive vs. active crossoverpost #1 of 117/31/12 at 5:39amThread Starter
Head-Fi's Best Sellerspost #2 of 117/31/12 at 6:04ampost #3 of 117/31/12 at 6:38amThread Starterpost #4 of 117/31/12 at 7:34am
A passive crossover is what is generally used in BA phones or standard home speakers. An active crossover is an external component piece. Google Rane active crossover.post #5 of 117/31/12 at 9:13am
passive crossovers use resistors, capcitors, choke coils to create the frequency and attenuation level of the crossover be it high pass (from X number UP) or low pass (from X number below) at a slopew of -6 dB, -12dB, -18dB and -24dB per octave.
Active crossovers do all this in the digital realm. Instead of changing values for capacitors and choke coils, depending on crossover, you press a button up or down to change crossover frequency and slope (changing values in the DSP code). The Rane Digital crossover has a fixed 24 dB slope but can adjust crossover frequency along with subsonic (below 20hz) and Ultrasonic (above 20Khz) filters. The active cross over has to do an A/D conversion than a D/A conversion unless fed a digital signal.post #6 of 117/31/12 at 10:17am
Active can used passive componenets in front of the amp stages as well. Active simply means that the amp is not driving a crossover and is directly connected to a driver. This alows a wider range of options for parts that aren't required to handle current and allowing direct control of an easier load (driver) by the amplifier.post #7 of 117/31/12 at 10:56amQuote:Originally Posted by goodvibes
Active can used passive componenets in front of the amp stages as well. Active simply means that the amp is not driving a crossover and is directly connected to a driver. This alows a wider range of options for parts that aren't required to handle current and allowing direct control of an easier load (driver) by the amplifier.
An ACTIVE crossover (the operative word is Crossover) HAS NO (meaning, none, zero, zilch, nada, zip, donut) PASSIVE COMPONENTS. Regardless of what JH Audio says as that is what you are eluding to.
In short, JH-3a is a PASSIVE system with 3 independant amplifiers per crossover (lows, mids and highs). No different than any other system out there that has a crossover for low, mids and highs. that does not constitute an active setup.post #8 of 117/31/12 at 4:25pm
I love Internet experts. You are absolutely wrong and my comment had nothing to do with JHA. For instance. http://www.head-fi.org/t/613417/unique-melody-platform-pure-6-6-driver-custom-iem-dac-active-crossover-and-amp Active crossovers have been around forever, as in before DSP. You still split frequencies with passive components in the gain stage in front of the amplifier. Any splitting of frequencies before the amp stage constitutes active. Because active crossovers often have gain stages to adjust level, the analog ones use typical RC passive networks as the filter portions within or between stages. As long as the network is impervious to load in or out and the amp output is directly connected to the driver terminals, it's active. Don't know exactly what JHA is doing but I think I read that it's a bit of both including bits AFTER the amp so I didn't reference them for a reason. (It's a different discussion but are the semantics of what JHA doing that big a deal is it gets the desired result?) I was just pointing out that it would be prohibitively expensive for most.
Edited by goodvibes - 7/31/12 at 4:42pmpost #9 of 117/31/12 at 6:17pm
Figgie you are being misleading as well, no, all active crossovers are not digital. Many these days are, but not all of them.
And GoodVibes, in order for it to be an active crossover, it has to use active components, typicaly opamps. I dont think there are any examples of someone putting a passive crossover before the amplifier, it wouldnt work, since the driver is almost always part of the crossover networkand couldnt be in a setup like thatpost #10 of 117/31/12 at 9:49pm
If you look in an old active crossover it can have a passive network between 2 simple gain stages and sometimes just one if it's for a specific load (amp set). In theory, if you know both the source impedance is low enough and amp input parameters (impedances and gain which is what the variable gain stages are for) a purely passive setup can be used before the last amplifier stage though it's better to keep things tidier. There are active crossovers on the market today that don't use op amps or DSP. Transistors and passive components to set slope and frequency. Now you may induce the amp to help along buy building a slope via the feedback loop etc but it's done with passive components, almost always with some in the signal path. When I said within gain stages in my earlier post, that's what I was referring to.
FM acoustics uses passive networks between two linear gain stages in their active network for instance which goes to my original option. It counts and that's all I said. I didn't limit active crossovers to passive networks either as I never even hinted that DSP and EQ via a feedback loop wasn't fine as well. All I said is that it wasn't limited to DSP and can use passive networks, as long as they're before the amp stage. That is absolutely true and in no way misleading. There are always amps involved and there will be slopes either within their circuit or before them.
Of course a crossover in front of an amp works. You need more than one amp and put a high pass in front of the tweeter amp and a low pass in front of the woofer amp but you need to know the impedances and gain involved etc. Vandersteen woofers used to come with a small box and that has a couple caps in it to be used in front of the amp. The value is chosen by knowing the amplifier input impedance and works as a 1st order high pass for the main speaker pair. The input impedance of the power amp would take the place of the driver in the network so you'd be picking values for 20K or so instead of 20 ohms. It allows the value of the cap to be 1000 times smaller and the voltages to be 50 times smaller so that better parts can be used under less duress and if designed well, the amplifier still has the type of control, damping and dynamics that you can't get without a direct driver connection.
We can talk semantics but what I said is correct and "An ACTIVE crossover (the operative word is Crossover) HAS NO (meaning, none, zero, zilch, nada, zip, donut) PASSIVE COMPONENTS." is ridiculously strong to be so wrong as was the JHA fanboy assumption.
Edited by goodvibes - 7/31/12 at 10:41pmpost #11 of 119/19/14 at 7:49pm
So, I don't even know what JHA is. Also I just noticed that this post was from two years ago, but I made an account to reply to this so I'm just gonna do it. EDIT: I also realized GoodbVibes is basically saying what I'm saying. I won't get upset if the mods take this down as I'm not adding any new information.
Since we want to not bother with petty semantics: crossovers are circuits. That's it. They're a couple of low/high/band-pass filters of varying order depending on the design. They are not "special" compared to any other filtering circuit. Like I said, I don't know what JHA is. It's not even fair to say I'm any kind of audiophile. I like good-sounding setups, but I'm nowhere near any "real" audiophile level.
In electrical engineering, circuits which feature ONLY PASSIVE components are called passive circuits. Circuits which feature ANY ACTIVE components -- namely transistors or diodes -- are called ACTIVE circuits. Suggesting that an active circuit features ONLY active components is ludicrous...an operational amplifier on its own is FULL of resistors which are PASSIVE components, paired in different configurations with a bunch of transistors.
Any crossover circuit which features any active components is an active crossover circuit. The ONLY way for something to be a passive crossover is for it to not have any active components. Crossovers on unpowered speakers, for example, are passive, otherwise you would need to feed external power to the speaker in order for it to function correctly.
While I'm on this topic, active does NOT imply digital. Not even a little bit. Yeah, you can have a digital setup, and since any kind of digital processing takes place on an IC full of transistors this means it would definitely be "active," but "active" on its own has NOTHING to do with analog or digital. Active filters are often analog circuits. Actually, filters and amplifiers, especially when you need them for very sensitive applications, are some of the main reasons why analog circuit design continues to be a highly active area of EE despite the huge amount of popularity in digital. Generally there are a lot fewer people doing analog, and those people tend to get paid a lot, because they're absolutely necessary and the topic can be quite difficult.
Edited by Acfeiln - 9/19/14 at 7:58pmReturn HomeBack to Forum: Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Passive vs. active crossover
Head-Fi's Best Sellers
- Buying Guide Headphones By Price Range
- › Tralucent Audio 1Plus2 IEM Impressions Thread 2 minutes ago
- › Knowledge Zenith (KZ) impressions thread 3 minutes ago
- › ATH-M50's left side stopped working? 3 minutes ago
- › Havi B3 Pro-1 Impressions Thread 4 minutes ago
- › Tralucent Audio Ref 1 IEM 4 minutes ago
- › Destroyed my HE-400, what to get now? 4 minutes ago
- › In-Depth Comparison: Ultimate Ears In-Ear Reference Monitor & Noble... 7 minutes ago
- › Fiio X5 Thread - info updated on Jan 17th 2014 8 minutes ago
- › Melbourne Head-Fi meet in second half of 2014 9 minutes ago
- › Little Dot MK VI / Little Dot MK VIII SE Owners Unite 10 minutes ago
- › Shure SE215 by Dinerenblanc
- › Shure SE425 Earphone by Dinerenblanc
- › Sony MDR-Z7 by Currawong
- › RHA T10i by Audiophile1811
- › Schiit Valhalla by Willy 2 Streams
- › Sennheiser HD-518 by quajaebisquiti
- › Brainwavz R3 Revised Edition by earfonia
- › HiFiMAN HE-560 by Terja
- › Audio-Technica ATH-M50x by xonarboy87
- › Brainwavz S5 In Ear Headphones by TheGame21x
- › Facebook, Ericsson & XL Indonesia Create...
- › The Great FiiO DAP FAQ Wiki
- › Audio Connections between components --...
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Introduction)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 2
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 3
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones) 2
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones) 3