Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › FitEar F111 — Impressions, Reviews & Discussion (previously TO GO! 111)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

FitEar F111 — Impressions, Reviews & Discussion (previously TO GO! 111) - Page 4

post #46 of 839

Thanks for the heads up. I'll send an e-mail to Kaneda and see what he says.

post #47 of 839

Pmed pricejapan. They said that they will not take in orders still the backorders are fulfilled.

post #48 of 839

How is the soundstage of the 111s? Really tempted to get one of these. Hope they get restocked fast.

post #49 of 839

I`m waiting for a fitear 111 and etymotic 4/s comparison too.

post #50 of 839
Quote:
Originally Posted by music_4321 View Post

 

 

 

 

They're talented musicians.

 


Edited by eke2k6 - 7/23/12 at 8:21am
post #51 of 839
anyone can compare the 111s with ocharaku flat 4. would like to know which has more clarity.
post #52 of 839

I'd still like to know what the impedance and efficiency of these are.

post #53 of 839

Hey just a quick question: How would you compare these to the IE8s?

post #54 of 839
Thread Starter 

^  If you enjoy your IE8s, stay away from the 111s -- they're complete opposites.

post #55 of 839
Quote:
Originally Posted by music_4321 View Post

^  If you enjoy your IE8s, stay away from the 111s -- they're complete opposites.

Huh, sounds good to me, since I've been looking for an IEM with a different sound signature an may be lending my IE8s to someone for awhile. Would you say the PRaT and speed of the FETG111 are faster than the IE8s? I'll be listening to many different genres out of an iPhone 4/Zune HD but most of my music is slightly fast paced.

Thanks for the reply btw!
post #56 of 839
Thread Starter 

^  I have personal issues with the term PRaT (and other audio terms) so forgive me if I don't address that one. Speed is excellent, and going by memory (haven't heard the IE8s for two years) I'd say it 111 (easily) outperforms the Senns in that respect.

post #57 of 839
Quote:
Originally Posted by music_4321 View Post

^  I have personal issues with the term PRaT (and other audio terms) so forgive me if I don't address that one. Speed is excellent, and going by memory (haven't heard the IE8s for two years) I'd say it 111 (easily) outperforms the Senns.

Wow now I'd really like to try these if possible, but for now I guess I'll begin slowly saving biggrin.gif The question is this or a custom like a Heir 4.a which would be around the same price but would likely bring about much more stress...
post #58 of 839

Ok, this thread is back online.

 

I'm looking forward to trying a pair of these myself in the future, along with the 334.

post #59 of 839
Thread Starter 

Good news -- the 111s are back in stock on the Fujiya AVIC site.

 

More good news -- until 18th August they're 3,000 Yen (~$40.00) cheaper.

 

The bad news -- PriceJapan is still not showing the 111s on their site (yet).

 

If anyone is thinking of contacting PriceJapan, make sure you mention the model / name change: from FitEar TO GO! 111 to FitEar F111


Edited by music_4321 - 8/5/12 at 4:57pm
post #60 of 839

Got a link?

 

Maybe you mean ¥30,000?  (¥3,000 is about US $30).

 

I was gonna go for the 10 bike ride up the road to try these out today (Fujiya avic is close to my house), but its raining.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › FitEar F111 — Impressions, Reviews & Discussion (previously TO GO! 111)