Do it. After owning the same amp/can combo as you and now getting the LL + 009. I can tell you it's a significant upgrade.
Featured Stories
Topics Discussed
- brandCavalli Audio
Related Forum Threads
- MADE IN THE USA - Any advise Last post on 4/2/13 at 12:57pm in High-end Audio Forum
- New Cavalli Audio Liquid Glass Amplifier - Fall Release Last post on 5/25/13 at 7:13am in Sponsor Announcements and Deals
- Cavalli Audio - Liquid Fire Last post on 6/12/13 at 5:04am in Sponsor Announcements and Deals
- Cavalli Audio - New Headfi Sponsor Last post on 7/25/12 at 4:24pm in Sponsor Announcements and Deals
- Product Sneak Peaks, CanJam @ Rocky Mountain Audio Fest (RMAF) - Head-Fi TV, Episode 013 Last post on 10/31/11 at 9:34am in Head-Fi Network & Industry News
Recent Reviews
-
A few years ago I was a big fan of the Shuttle Barebone SFF PCs for LAN party gaming. I also was a big fan of surround audio for gaming. I had a soundblaster that days. But the graphics cards grew...
-
Good solid bass, not very impactful, definitely not for bassheads. Has a warmer feel, and is not very laid back. Also less colored than I would expect. Overall good, as I paid around 120 for...
-
I joined head-fi specificaly to post this review.... First - my credentials as a headphone user (as far as they go). I've been into hi-fi for 3 decades, and consider myself a reasonably...
-
Disclaimer: This review isn't based on NwAvguy words and/or the stereotypes arround the ODAC. You won't see me using the words "transparent" and or "clinical". I actually gave the thing an honest...
-
Asus is a well known tech company. They make laptops, desktops, tablets, motherboards, video cards, and a few other odds and ends. Around here, they are most known for their...
Cavalli Audio - Liquid Lightning - Page 8
Head-Fi's Best Sellers
- Icenine2
- Trader Feedback: +2
-
- offline
- 1,723 Posts. Joined 8/2005
- Location: Arlington Heights, Illinois
- Select All Posts By This User
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm screaming into a pillow!!
- mwilson
- Trader Feedback: +14
- Ants in my Stax
-
- offline
- 941 Posts. Joined 12/2009
- Location: South Florida
- Select All Posts By This User
x2. Same path here
- CDWMcInSpots
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 158 Posts. Joined 2/2012
- Location: Norway
- Select All Posts By This User
STAX vs. third party amplifiers
Originally Posted by athenaesword 
I am wondering about exactly the same thing. From reading this thread I get the impression that the LL gets a lot of love from people who listens to bass heavy music. Considering both the LL and the BHSE as an upgrade from the 727-II, I would love to know more about this too..
there's not enough written about the 727 vs the LL and the other third party offerings. everyone seems to agree that the 727 is a worthy amp, and generally don't have bad things to say about it, but it never seems to be directly compared to the 3rd party amps. it's as if its shelved because it costs 1/3 to 1/2 the price of the other offerings. if i've missed out on the comparisons somewhere pardon me, but I just haven't seen any.
Well expressed athenaesword. I've been thinking the same, and wishing for comparisons with STAX amplifiers. At least Playback should have done it in all three of their reviews of the third party amplifiers for electrostatic headphones. I would have liked InnerFidelity's Tyll Hertsens to have done the same when he wrote about STAX SR-009 and SR-007.
Headphones is an (arguably quite large) niche. High end headphones is definitely a niche, probably rather small. Electrostatic headphones is a small niche within high end headphones and is dominated by STAX. STAX is a small company as documented by InnerFidelity's Tyll Hertsens in his article about the sale of STAX to Edifier. I further expect that most of STAX' sales (as most manufacturer's sales) are their lower priced products. STAX SRM-727* and SRM-007t* (and SR-009 and SR-007*) probably aren't the bulk of their sales.
(The bulk of) STAX headphones are typically bought by grown up (40-50 years and up) music lovers that listen to classical music, jazz etc. These people aren't hifi or headphone enthusiasts, but they appreciate good music and good reproduction of it. They may very well be among the regular audience of the local symphony orchestra etc. These people typically visit a STAX dealer, buy a complete STAX set and listen to their music without thinking much more about the equipment for years.
The third party manufacturers of amplifiers for electrostatic headphones are hence very small within this tiny niche. They are much smaller than the already little STAX. Their electrostatic headphone amplifiers sell in much smaller quantities than STAX (which also has rather small quantities to begin with). They are all very small scale and hence have to divide their costs on only a few produced units. As far as I know all the third party manufacturers only sell amplifiers that are more expensive than STAX and mainly/only(?) direct from the manufacturer. This indicates that no manufacturers seems to be able to compete with STAX in or near STAX's price range, not even STAX's most expensive products.
The top STAX products cost approximately 1/2 (or less) than the third party products. I would expect that we can divide the difference in two. One part gives better sound quality or else there (probably) wouldn't be any customers. The other part covers the extra costs of small scale operation, i.e. fewer units sold to cover development, tooling, production (line), marketing, sales and other costs. This means that customers pay an extra premium for products from third party manufacturers compared to STAX. In other words: STAX would probably be able to sell a product with a similar sound quality level at a lower price.
Please, don't misunderstand. I'm not attacking the third party manufacturers. I'm just trying to look into the (sad?) facts of life and mechanics of business and economics.
Please notice that my sonic preferences may be different from yours.
Well, to begin with, the LL outputs more power at low volumes. The mids and trebles are very clean, even cleaner and brighter than the BHSE, but not as harsh as presented in STAX’s 727A (which I do also own and can't listen for more than half an hour straight).
The bass simply shines. The bass extension (which is, for me, the biggest downside of the WES) is very deep. Some people may find that, as a solid state amp, it has to necessarily sound bright. I don’t think it’s that bright. It just comes more alive in comparison to the other two amps.
Some mention of the 727A in comparison to the LL and BHSE by EricoHGB
I saw and was a (bit) confused by this. I don't think I've seen any others describing the STAX amplifiers as "harsh". I've even gotten the impression that some thinks the STAX SRM-727* and especially SRM-007t* soften or dull the SR-009. I've interpreted Spritzer that way.
- runeight
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Sponsor: Cavalli Audio
-
- offline
- 2,326 Posts. Joined 10/2002
- Select All Posts By This User
An interesting question. Why not start a separate thread to discuss this?
- ericohgb
- Trader Feedback: +7
-
- offline
- 254 Posts. Joined 1/2010
- Location: São Paulo, BRAZIL
- Select All Posts By This User

STAX vs. third party amplifiers
Well expressed athenaesword. I've been thinking the same, and wishing for comparisons with STAX amplifiers. At least Playback should have done it in all three of their reviews of the third party amplifiers for electrostatic headphones. I would have liked InnerFidelity's Tyll Hertsens to have done the same when he wrote about STAX SR-009 and SR-007.
Headphones is an (arguably quite large) niche. High end headphones is definitely a niche, probably rather small. Electrostatic headphones is a small niche within high end headphones and is dominated by STAX. STAX is a small company as documented by InnerFidelity's Tyll Hertsens in his article about the sale of STAX to Edifier. I further expect that most of STAX' sales (as most manufacturer's sales) are their lower priced products. STAX SRM-727* and SRM-007t* (and SR-009 and SR-007*) probably aren't the bulk of their sales.
(The bulk of) STAX headphones are typically bought by grown up (40-50 years and up) music lovers that listen to classical music, jazz etc. These people aren't hifi or headphone enthusiasts, but they appreciate good music and good reproduction of it. They may very well be among the regular audience of the local symphony orchestra etc. These people typically visit a STAX dealer, buy a complete STAX set and listen to their music without thinking much more about the equipment for years.
The third party manufacturers of amplifiers for electrostatic headphones are hence very small within this tiny niche. They are much smaller than the already little STAX. Their electrostatic headphone amplifiers sell in much smaller quantities than STAX (which also has rather small quantities to begin with). They are all very small scale and hence have to divide their costs on only a few produced units. As far as I know all the third party manufacturers only sell amplifiers that are more expensive than STAX and mainly/only(?) direct from the manufacturer. This indicates that no manufacturers seems to be able to compete with STAX in or near STAX's price range, not even STAX's most expensive products.
The top STAX products cost approximately 1/2 (or less) than the third party products. I would expect that we can divide the difference in two. One part gives better sound quality or else there (probably) wouldn't be any customers. The other part covers the extra costs of small scale operation, i.e. fewer units sold to cover development, tooling, production (line), marketing, sales and other costs. This means that customers pay an extra premium for products from third party manufacturers compared to STAX. In other words: STAX would probably be able to sell a product with a similar sound quality level at a lower price.
Please, don't misunderstand. I'm not attacking the third party manufacturers. I'm just trying to look into the (sad?) facts of life and mechanics of business and economics.
I saw and was a (bit) confused by this. I don't think I've seen any others describing the STAX amplifiers as "harsh". I've even gotten the impression that some thinks the STAX SRM-727* and especially SRM-007t* soften or dull the SR-009. I've interpreted Spritzer that way.
Dear friend,
I own both the LL and the 727-A. I do not consider the 727-A a bad amp and because of this I also plan to keep it but I find it too bright for listening for long periods of time. I don't feel the same with the LL. That's what I meant. Also own the 007t. I don't think it's harsh nor bright amp. It's a lot more "musical" than the 727-A.
Regards,
Erico
- IanG
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 19 Posts. Joined 4/2012
- Location: West Yorkshire, UK
- Select All Posts By This User
I've had my LL for seven weeks now - with both 007 Mk 1 and 009 headphones.
I have heard the BHSE too, with both headphones; and also have the Stax 007t and the Stax 717 amplifiers. Now I really must sell two amplifiers and one headphone and what is certain is that I will keep the 009s and the LL.
As with my conventional hifi, the test of a good component is that it is (in my view) characterless (just a conduit for the music) and that's how I feel about the LL. The build quality is excellent and, for me, the aesthetics are the same - again on the grounds that I can ignore the equipment and just listen to the music.
If I chose to listen for a long period to the LL and the BHSE I might be able to discriminate but, for me, that would be time wasted. They are both excellent pieces of electronics. For me the BHSE doesn't get on to the agenda because valves would give me the option to fiddle and I don't want to do that; and also give me a feeling of possible poorer reliability (which is probably groundless!).
007 Mk 1s v 009s? Both great, but I think the 009s have better frequency balance, more detail and preferable imaging characteristics. The 007s are darker in tone and quite beguiling and, without doubt, something which I could be entirely happy with.
Not retried the 007t and the 717 amplifiers since getting the LL. I shall just need to sell them before I get tempted to try them again.
- CDWMcInSpots
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 158 Posts. Joined 2/2012
- Location: Norway
- Select All Posts By This User


STAX vs. third party amplifiers
[...]
Please notice that my sonic preferences may be different from yours.
Well, to begin with, the LL outputs more power at low volumes. The mids and trebles are very clean, even cleaner and brighter than the BHSE, but not as harsh as presented in STAX’s 727A (which I do also own and can't listen for more than half an hour straight).
The bass simply shines. The bass extension (which is, for me, the biggest downside of the WES) is very deep. Some people may find that, as a solid state amp, it has to necessarily sound bright. I don’t think it’s that bright. It just comes more alive in comparison to the other two amps.
Some mention of the 727A in comparison to the LL and BHSE by EricoHGB
I saw and was a (bit) confused by this. I don't think I've seen any others describing the STAX amplifiers as "harsh". I've even gotten the impression that some thinks the STAX SRM-727* and especially SRM-007t* soften or dull the SR-009. I've interpreted Spritzer that way.
Dear friend,
I own both the LL and the 727-A. I do not consider the 727-A a bad amp and because of this I also plan to keep it but I find it too bright for listening for long periods of time. I don't feel the same with the LL. That's what I meant. Also own the 007t. I don't think it's harsh nor bright amp. It's a lot more "musical" than the 727-A.
Regards,
Erico
Thank you for your answer.
Your taste
It would be nice if you would be kind to write something about your sound (signature) and musical preferences because it will help as interpret what you write. I didn't find anything about this in your profile.
Loudness levels
The human hearing varies with sound pressure level, frequency and more. I beleive loudness levels is an important factor in the way we experience audio reproduction equipment differently. I listen at (very) moderate loudness levels. What are your loudness levels?
- CDWMcInSpots
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 158 Posts. Joined 2/2012
- Location: Norway
- Select All Posts By This User

I've had my LL for seven weeks now - with both 007 Mk 1 and 009 headphones.
I have heard the BHSE too, with both headphones; and also have the Stax 007t and the Stax 717 amplifiers. Now I really must sell two amplifiers and one headphone and what is certain is that I will keep the 009s and the LL.
[...]
Not retried the 007t and the 717 amplifiers since getting the LL. I shall just need to sell them before I get tempted to try them again.
Please do try to compare them with the Liquid Lightning before selling, and tell us about your observations.
- arnaud
- Trader Feedback: +2
- Stax and Sushi
-
- offline
- 1,605 Posts. Joined 11/2002
- Location: Tokyo
- Select All Posts By This User
I did not want to ask it again, especially in this sponsor thread, but indeed that'd be rather nice to have a comparison however biased it might be.
- MorbidToaster
- Trader Feedback: +30
-
- offline
- 12,906 Posts. Joined 4/2010
- Location: Hipster Haven of the South (Austin, Texas)
- Select All Posts By This User
Most of the Cavalli fans I've met are generally level headed about that kind of thing (of course there's a few nuts). At least I know I am. I'm a big fan, but that's because what I hear is very good.
If I sat down and heard something that bested one of Alex's designs (in a price range I'm willing to spend of course) I'd let him know he needs to step it up and buy the other one.
Blind fan-boying is pretty ridiculous, IMO.
- CDWMcInSpots
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 158 Posts. Joined 2/2012
- Location: Norway
- Select All Posts By This User
It may very well be better to write it in the older/original thread. It wasn't obvious to me that it was a good idea to have the main product thread with impressions in "Head-Fi.org › Forums › Sponsor Announcements and Deals › Cavalli Audio - Liquid Lightning". Such a thread should probably be more independent and free of explicit and implicit restrictions.
- CDWMcInSpots
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 158 Posts. Joined 2/2012
- Location: Norway
- Select All Posts By This User
Why the blue volume knob and power LED area?
The box of the Cavalli Audio Liquid Lightning seems to be nice, and from the reports, fitting the price. Why does it have the blue volume knob and area around the power LED? In my view, it just doesn't fit in with the general style and level of finish of the product and for that matter STAX SR-009 and STAX SR-007 which it probably will be used together with.
- Radio_head
- Trader Feedback: +28
-
- offline
- 2,836 Posts. Joined 6/2009
- Location: Milwaukee, WI
- Select All Posts By This User
- CDWMcInSpots
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 158 Posts. Joined 2/2012
- Location: Norway
- Select All Posts By This User
Product information
I have looked at the product page (http://www.cavalliaudio.com/products/liquid-lightning-headphone-amp) and the shop page (http://www.cavalliaudio.com/liquid-lightning-headphone-amp), but unfortunately didn't find much information, even less than Playback presented (http://www.avguide.com/review/cavali-audio-liquid-lightning-electrostatic-headphone-amplifier-playback-60?page=4). Some of the information even differ (i.e. output voltage swing peak to peak).
Questions:
- What are the technical data?
- What are the physical metric (and imperial if you wish to cater for customers in Burma (Myanmar), Liberia, and the United States) measurements and weight?
- What is the corret information when it differ between Cavalli Audio and Playback?
- Why isn't all information presented on the product page?
- Where do I find a PDF version of the user manual?
- Is the Liquid Lightning "CE Certified for global distribution" like the Liquid Fire?
- Cavalli Audio - Liquid Lightning
Head-Fi's Best Sellers
Recent Discussions
- › HD800 S/N 15k+ 1 minute ago
- › Measuring Amp frequency response with free software! 1 minute ago
- › T-PEOS H-200 - new triple hybrid IEM - Appreciation thread 2 minutes ago
- › Google Nexus 4 2 minutes ago
- › [REVIEW] Aurisonics ASG-2 - 1Plus2, TG334, Senn IE800, Flat-4, RDB+... 2 minutes ago
- › Noontec RIO, IEM by Noontec 3 minutes ago
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide: (Updated: 5/23/2013.... 3 minutes ago
- › HiFiMAN HM-901 - a review in progress: Factory visit starting pg... 4 minutes ago
- › Ocharaku Flat-4 KAEDE (Maple) 5 minutes ago
- › The Audio Technica W3000ANV Appreciation Thread 5 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Xonar U7 - 7.1 USB-Soundkarte by pietcux
- › Shure SE215 Special Edition by Landon Watson
- › AKG K451 High-Performance Foldable Mini Headset (Black) by tintoy
- › JDS Labs ODAC by Rem0o
- › ASUS Xonar Essence STU by project86
- › Unique Melody Miracle by lin0003
- › KEF M200 Hi-Fi In-Ear Headphones, Aluminum/Black by mcook1970
- › Beats Solo by Dr. Dre On-Ear Headphones with ControlTalk (White) by TheBrutux168
- › Skullcandy 50/50 - Headset ( in-ear ear-bud ) - white, chrome by TheBrutux168
- › Sennheiser HD-600 by JustinBieber
New Articles
- › Syncing music and making playlists work with... by Currawong
- › Mac OS X Music Players - alternatives to iTunes by miceblue
- › STAX SR-007 (Omega II) ... A Review After 4... by Currawong
- › List of lossless and high-res music (FLAC,... by ffivaz
- › Beware of the following scams and people... by Currawong
- › Sennheiser 449 Mod Possibly 4 8 Mod by hernan604
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Computer Audio) by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Portable... by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Desktop Audio) by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Headphone... by joe
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map



















