I'm about to take the plunge and order my first pair of IEMs.
Doing some reading a lot of IEMs can be quite bassy (at the price range I'm looking at) whereas I'd prefer something more balanced with lovey mids and I think the FAD 'phones seem to be what I'm after.
I initially read some reviews of the II's but think the IV's look worth the extra so was planning on ordering some from buysmartjapan. However, I noticed I can get the V's for not a whole lot more (certainly less than I can buy IV's for new in the UK) so they are an option too. VI's would be nice but my bank balance disagrees....
Between the IV & the V's which do those of you who've owned/ auditioned both find to be the better all rounder for a wide variety of genres and which is the less bright sounding, as I find the treble on some 'phones quite shrill or overbearing to the point where I can't listen to them. Fairly polite trebles are definitely my preference.
Also I see that the V's are available in regular or Aging flavours. Is there any audible difference between the two or is it purely a cosmetic thing?
Thanks in advance and I'm enjoying working my way through this thread (some lovely eye candy too) :)
Edited by jellofund - 3/10/14 at 3:30am