Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › "Mad Dog" by MrSpeakers, modified Fostex T50RP review
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"Mad Dog" by MrSpeakers, modified Fostex T50RP review - Page 256

post #3826 of 6249
Hernia? Psssshhh, just lay down put on your headphone and plug into that heavy amp and your good until help comes. cool.gif
Edited by soundeffect - 2/28/13 at 2:00pm
post #3827 of 6249

The eventual dullness of a wound makes your hearing more acute biggrin.gif

post #3828 of 6249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Armaegis View Post

It's not overkill until your amp is heavy enough to risk a hernia every time you try to move it. 

 

Cough, cough M3 in a suitcase with big-arsed batteries, cough, cough....

post #3829 of 6249
Quote:
Originally Posted by anoxy View Post

Think it'd be overkill to buy a Hifiman EF-5 to pair with my NFB-12 and Alpha Dogs?

 

 

Well, considering mine get a lot of time paired with a >$3k amp, it at least doesn't win the trophy for the most overkill setup.

post #3830 of 6249
Quote:
Originally Posted by aamefford View Post

 

Cough, cough M3 in a suitcase with big-arsed batteries, cough, cough....

Hey hey... I haven't actually built that yet cool.gif And y'know... if I get enough batteries I could fit a b22 in there... 

post #3831 of 6249

I use an AMB M^3 with power unit with the Mad Dogs @ work. Good combination.

post #3832 of 6249

Has anyone tried these with an inexpensive tube amp like the Bravo? I'm intrigued with these things. The price is definitely right, at about $70, and from what I read the sound isn't too bad. Plus I can geek out a bit if I want to by trying different tubes. I'm very close to getting one of these but I'm interested in hearing any feedback on how the Mad Dogs do with these types of amps.

post #3833 of 6249
.
Edited by aamefford - 2/28/13 at 7:50pm
post #3834 of 6249
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattTCG View Post

 

I think that you must be referring to the MD's with dog pads. If you have not heard the new version with Alpha pads, they sound quite a bit different.  Just guessing here...

 

I have both.

 

The Alpha Pads shifted the tonal balance to the high frequencies, which is the good direction (for me, at least).

It's still not quite enough for me, I still have to play with EQ (which is fine!) to make them sound the way I like.

 

The Fostex HP-A3 is also warm and smooth so it doesn't help. An O2 + ODAC might be a better choice (or the Aune T1 with bright tube). This might be a downgrade, though.


Edited by Clemmaster - 3/1/13 at 1:37am
post #3835 of 6249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clemmaster View Post

 

I have both.

 

The Alpha Pads shifted the tonal balance to the high frequencies, which is the good direction (for me, at least).

It's still not quite enough for me, I still have to play with EQ (which is fine!) to make them sound the way I like.

 

The Fostex HP-A3 is also warm and smooth so it doesn't help. An O2 + ODAC might be a better choice (or the Aune T1 with bright tube). This might be a downgrade, though.

That's good to hear, I just got n odac. Which has nice high balance shift as well. It made my dt 880 brighter, in addition I have n indeed G3 [bravo style tube] and a MIllet Hybrid with RCA 12ua7s [a bright smooth mid heavy tube imo] so I'm very excited! Although sadly my dt 990s are coming in b4 my EXPRESS SHIPPED Mad Dogs lol so if the mad dogs r darker, 'll love it after the bright 990

post #3836 of 6249
Quote:
Originally Posted by anoxy View Post

Yeah this is my one quip with Dogs. I'm forced to wear my glasses like so lol...

 

I have very similar glasses (the temple arms and tips are likely exactly the same since they are also RayBan) and I can wear them with my HE-400 fairly comfortably for a few hours.  They have some grip, but not like the death grip my former pair of DT1350's had, which is the main reason they are former.  I did some adjustments to the headband of the HE-400 so I imagine something similar can be done with the MadDogs if necessary.

post #3837 of 6249
I actually have a thinner pair of glasses that I wear at home that have never given me trouble with headphones...

I didn't get them to wear with headphones (though this being Head Fi, I'm sure no one would bat an eye if I did), just got them because I'm pretty rough on glasses when I'm at home. I'll fall asleep with them, I'll scrape the corners poking under the desk or into closets, etc.

Got tired of bending and scratching the frame of the nice Oakley frames I wear outside so I got a thin frame that's more spindly and durable (one of those Flexons) so I can beat on them without care. It also provides a nice break from the 3-point Oakleys which grip tighter.

Just worked out that they play nicer with headphones too... My medical covers most of the cost a new pair of glasses every other year anyway.

So yeah, dunno if it's weird but that's how I roll. tongue.gif
Edited by Impulse - 3/1/13 at 9:19am
post #3838 of 6249

The glasses I wear are very similar in thickness.  The only issue I have is if I don't slightly slide my glasses down my nose and I put on my MD I can feel the plastic nose pads dig into my nose.  With me sliding them down they are lose enough that they slightly float above my nose when putting on the MD's.  Sound quality wise, I can't tell a difference with my glasses on or off.

post #3839 of 6249

For those concerned about my picture/post, don't be!

 

My face is on the narrow side and I like to wear big oversized frames. And even with that said, my Alpha Dogs fit comfortably with my glasses on. However, after a really long listening session, a pressure point might develop near my temples if I don't readjust the glasses. Note that I don't wear my glasses religiously because the prescription is very slight— only for reading sometimes when I feel like my eyes are strained. 

 

The majority of you will be completely okay wearing glasses with MDs, So don't hesitate because of me.

post #3840 of 6249
Quote:
Originally Posted by aamefford View Post

I also was at the meet, and had my mad dogs with alpha pads with me (I was part of the test group, so I had them at the time).  I was able to compare pretty close to A/B, and had the same basic esperience.  HE500 is a great and capable headphone, but much brighter and a bit airier than the MD.  In the short time listening, I liked the MD a bit better I suspect as much because I was used to it as anything.  I also decided I'd like to spend a bit more time with the HE500 to see if I want a pair.  Right now, the HD650 is in the top seat of desired open headphones (above the HD800 for my tastes).

 

I'd think that if you like the Mad Dogs, the next logical update should be the LCD-2.

 

To me, the LCD-2 had more presence and weight (to the music) than the HE-500. Plus it retains the same smooth treble and improves a bit on soundstage + bass compared to Mad Dogs.

 

Funny... but I honestly can't shake how similar the Mad Dogs sounded to the LCD-2.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › "Mad Dog" by MrSpeakers, modified Fostex T50RP review