Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Unique Melody Platform Pure 6 (PP6) - review (1st post), discussion, appreciation, & tour thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Unique Melody Platform Pure 6 (PP6) - review (1st post), discussion, appreciation, & tour thread - Page 32

post #466 of 478

Haven't heard the JH Audio unit, but I reviewed the PP6 over at InnerFidelity. Link in my sig in case you missed it.

post #467 of 478

yes, I read good things about the  UM PP6 or the JH-3A, but.... I am still comparing this integrated solution against a high end cIEM (JH13, JH16, ...) + a separate portable high/End DAC/AMP ?  

 

Indeed, I am stil quite septical with this solution because I have the impression that the DAC + the 3 amps fitted in this tinny box can NOT be as good quality as a dedicated portable DAC/AMP like for example the CEntrance Hifi-M8 (that I also have on order).

 

--> so, does the "synergy" between the AMP and the IEM really compensate for the lower quality (I believe) of the internal DAC and Amps fited in the UM PP6 or the JH-3A ???

 

many thanks for your answers

post #468 of 478

My JH16A (Not FP) sounds much better with the 3A amp then with Portaphilo 627 out of my CLAS. 

post #469 of 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindskog View Post

My JH16A (Not FP) sounds much better with the 3A amp then with Portaphilo 627 out of my CLAS. 

Thanks for the info. Thisis good news. 

What source do you use with the 3A ?  Indeed, the 3A do not has optical in, and it's USB is limited !  do you use coax in ? 

post #470 of 478

Yes this comparison was with the same source of course. The CLAS have coax out.

post #471 of 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALRAINBOW View Post

Ok here is what I hear .
First off the jh3a jh16 combo not the same but in some ways it's is.

With the amp and useing spidif coax or a external USB to coax like halide . The sound has more ambience , more space between instramints and in some ways more clear and precise.

If I use them without the amp I can get really close but useing about 5 k in electronics.

As for the pp6. The cross connect is not availible as of yet . So only the DAC/ amp box may be used . So as I do beleave there is something to be gained I cannot say without the cable.

Foot note the jh in ref is the freq phase
I also own a pair of jh16 all new drivers from JH. And rescelled at UM . I can say they sound great but not the same as the combo freq phase . But I can only here the difference when A/B testing its hard for me to tell from my memory . I'm just not that good at it. But there is a difference . The same as I said above. So in the end I think the pp6 is a good value based on not needing an amp or DAC. The same for JH . But this is just my opinion

AL D

 

As you can se AL things it takes "5k in electronics" to get close to what the 3A do with JH 16. But then you have to consider if you like the signature of the JH16 also. But I think when you get both the FP (for phase correction when use without the amp) and the amp for super phase correction, it is a good deal since I use my JH16 at least 50% on the go without the amp. I don't have FP though :( 

post #472 of 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindskog View Post

 

As you can se AL things it takes "5k in electronics" to get close to what the 3A do with JH 16. But then you have to consider if you like the signature of the JH16 also. But I think when you get both the FP (for phase correction when use without the amp) and the amp for super phase correction, it is a good deal since I use my JH16 at least 50% on the go without the amp. I don't have FP though :( 

Thanks for this added information.  So YES I am now a believer of  3A & UM-PP6.   The only questions remains... JH-3A or UM-PP6 ?

 

Which one has the best sound ????

 

Plus... JH-3A has the advantage of the IEM being able to be used without the 3A Amp while UM-PP6 has the advantage of accepting Optical In as well as USB at full 24/192 resolution while JH-3A really need a Coax.    My curent DAP (iRiver AK100 don't has COAX :-(...)

post #473 of 478

The price difference covers for a DAP with coax out. But I don't think you need it the 3A sounds very good without digital in. As mentioned before you should as ALRAINBOW about comparison between them as he has both, but I must say again that the JH16A without amp is as good as JH16FP and I certainly don't think that PP6 will be that good without amp even tough they might be even better with amp. I don't know if it is possible to get the JH3A with the 13FP instead of JH16FP. If that's so I think that would be even better! Because the 3A has separate amp for bass to give you more then you can handle even if you use it with jh13, and JH13FP is supposed to be the best CIEM out there according to the huge CIEM test...

 

http://www.innerfidelity.com/content/totl-madness-24-top-line-custom-ear-monitors-reviewed

post #474 of 478

Has UM come out with the cross connect cable for the pp6 . they said they would mail it to me when released but as of this writing no cable .

post #475 of 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALRAINBOW View Post
 

Has UM come out with the cross connect cable for the pp6 . they said they would mail it to me when released but as of this writing no cable .

RE: Crossover Cable

 

 

I have been in contact with the UK HQ, they say that it's so new they're just in the process of listing it on the website, will cost £115 in the UK and I think it is $175 AUS.

 

So they are now starting to ship it, I think we need a few reviews on here by a pro iem reviewer: either average_joe or ljokerl

 

All impressions with it would be welcome.

Comparisons especially so, as I'm headed down the slippery slope of purchasing a second and then definitely a third CIEM (there may even be room for a fourth...)

 

(done a quick search and can't find any references - please correct me if i'm wrong)

post #476 of 478

Crossover cables? Damn, I would love to get one.

 

So far, what has it been nearly a year now? My PP6 has been good. Although I do prefer warmer tone, the experience of PP6 has always been more or less pleasant.

Few things:

a) Declippers are essential IMO with the PP6. I never really felt the need to declip my digitial signal before, but with PP6 it improves the isolation further.

b) the sound quality is good, but the mechanical design of this thing is so....meh. The loose connection was fixed with the nail polisher-thank you for the recommendations. However, now I'm having problem with the loose USB connection. Sending it back for a repair.

post #477 of 478
Has any one rec a CRAUSS connect cable
I have not rev mine. They are shown on the website but only as an option
I cannot buy it alone.
I have emailed them twice and in different ways with no response
Can someone here help ??
post #478 of 478
The cross connect cable is listed on there website. But not as a purchase without the pp6. We as pp6 owners how can we obtain one. ?

I have emailed them and not rec a reply. And ideas here . ?

Al
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Unique Melody Platform Pure 6 (PP6) - review (1st post), discussion, appreciation, & tour thread