funny you say that. Ive actually read your review on these headphones before! the thing that troubles me is the bass quantity. I have no doubt that they are great headphones, especially for the price, but when I read that the m50 had more bass quantity according to another knowledgeable user I was a little turned off. I listen to pretty much only edm nowadays and ive found even my d2000s lacking in the bass department (well to clarify, the punch above sub-bass). This is where the pro 900s came in and eventually back to my first step into audiofileism, the q40s. I love that the denons compete with the big boys at a fraction of the cost, but I'm to the point of my headphone journey (a long and expensive one :P), where I am searching for that extra 10-15% that the top-tier provides. That being said, I can not afford the down payment sized price tags way up there and need something a little more budget friendly. Do you believe that it would be an upstep from pro 900s or more of a side step? both are admirable, but I have pulled the trigger too early before on what turned out to be side steps and compromises.
Q's on the Q40s - Page 2
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
post #16 of 17
5/5/12 at 11:30pm
Head-Fi's Best Sellers
post #17 of 17
5/5/12 at 11:45pm
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »















