Originally Posted by complin
You seem to be implying that for some people using Stax with their musical tastes is like throwing pearls before swine If that's your opinion it's a very arrogant one.
That was not my intention.
But when they read comments on forums for many years, they automatically come to the following conclusion:
For many people, high-quality headphone systems are not made.
Because these people are on a sound that has to do with a natural play anything.
I must not go beyond Mozart with fat basses.
I must not use a bass smash the ears.
I do not have any volume until your eardrums burst.
An electric guitar does not have to scream.
If you read comments over the years, there are very often exactly these things that are criticized. Or similar.
Then I ask myself: What do a quality reproduction with such remarks?
in my opinion, is the circus. It has nothing to do with subjective or objective. It's a circus.
I'll give one more example:
I would have to seek out the appropriate words - is very troublesome.
Here things have been written about Stax (007, first version to last):
If you have read this, you had to come to the conclusion: The Stax engineers must be stupid. Correspondingly, the difference would be this: It's raining at the same time, while it is dry.
I know all the 007 versions. Not a single one is such that it is not 100% Stax.
Such it was written as an example: the sound is so dark, so much waste in the heights - it did not work. Scrap.
etc, etc, etc,
It is only an example. I would have to seek out everything in detail.
If you read something that has nothing to do with objective or subjective. It is because the wrong people have a tool in your hand.
And this view has nothing to do with arrogance.
There are people who have nothing to do with natural reproduction. It's about people who have no sensitivity. You give them something in his hand and it breaking.
And so then what are the comments..
Edited by michaelxray - 10/21/12 at 6:02am