Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › The FitEar CIEM Impressions Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The FitEar CIEM Impressions Thread - Page 9

post #121 of 4141


I just love the FitEar envelope.
post #122 of 4141
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisceriousZERO View Post



I just love the FitEar envelope.

Did it come with 000 cable or you bought it?

post #123 of 4141
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtthefirst View Post

Did it come with 000 cable or you bought it?

Bought that separately with my TG334s smily_headphones1.gif
post #124 of 4141
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisceriousZERO View Post



I just love the FitEar envelope.

 

Is the black plate an option ?

post #125 of 4141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimouille View Post

 

Is the black plate an option ?

Yes :) There are several options to the colors you can have, and combinations at that.

post #126 of 4141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimouille View Post

 

Is the black plate an option ?

 

Here is all of the options.

 

http://fitear.jp/music/order/order.html

post #127 of 4141
I personally prefer some good demo version too, as the custom one, though sound cleaner, usually has thinner vocal. I think that might also be the case here for the togo334 and mh334, though I haven't heard the custom one yet, someone can confirm this?
post #128 of 4141
Quote:
Originally Posted by czqdtc View Post

I personally prefer some good demo version too, as the custom one, though sound cleaner, usually has thinner vocal. I think that might also be the case here for the togo334 and mh334, though I haven't heard the custom one yet, someone can confirm this?

I personally do not own the MH335 But I do have the TG334...
post #129 of 4141
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisceriousZERO View Post


I personally do not own the MH335 But I do have the TG334...


Do you mean MH334 ?

post #130 of 4141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimouille View Post


Do you mean MH334 ?

Yes, sorry, in 335 mode xD
post #131 of 4141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by czqdtc View Post

I personally prefer some good demo version too, as the custom one, though sound cleaner, usually has thinner vocal. I think that might also be the case here for the togo334 and mh334, though I haven't heard the custom one yet, someone can confirm this?

 

Can't speak about vocals but from the very little time I've spent with the MH334 vs TG!334, I felt the MH334 to have even nicer imaging but less treble extension than the TG!334. The MH334 owner (who tried my TG!334) seems to have similar sentiments. We speculate the titanium tubes is the contributor to the treble extension of the TG!334. But what gives the MH334 even deeper imaging, we're not certain.

post #132 of 4141
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnakChan View Post

 

Can't speak about vocals but from the very little time I've spent with the MH334 vs TG!334, I felt the MH334 to have even nicer imaging but less treble extension than the TG!334. The MH334 owner (who tried my TG!334) seems to have similar sentiments. We speculate the titanium tubes is the contributor to the treble extension of the TG!334. But what gives the MH334 even deeper imaging, we're not certain.


It might be the case that the more extended treble distracts your focus on the vocal resulting in 'less nice' imaging, while with the MH334 having a tad less treble translates into slightly more prominent mid hence 'deeper' imaging. It's kind of like a psychology phenomenon though I'm not really sure, that's just my experience when tweaking xo's.

post #133 of 4141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tranhieu View Post


It might be the case that the more extended treble distracts your focus on the vocal resulting in 'less nice' imaging, while with the MH334 having a tad less treble translates into slightly more prominent mid hence 'deeper' imaging. It's kind of like a psychology phenomenon though I'm not really sure, that's just my experience when tweaking xo's.

 

I don't doubt you on that. As I'm noticing (but don't know if it's always 100% true) is that a U shaped or V shaped signature tend to have an apparent wider soundstage but slightly flatter imaging, whereas something with a more prominent mid could potentially (but not always!) yield a deeper imaging but less apparent soundstage.

 

But I'd like to stress on the operative word being apparent.

post #134 of 4141
Posting this very pretty picture of my new balanced ALO SXC24 cables on my pretty MH335DWs...



Also, regarding the test unit of the MH335DW I can say that the vocals sounded more bloated on them than the MH335DW themselves. That being said it may have been because of the tips used or something. The MH335DW has a much clearer vocal imaging than the test unit smily_headphones1.gif
post #135 of 4141
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisceriousZERO View Post

Posting this very pretty picture of my new balanced ALO SXC24 cables on my pretty MH335DWs...



Also, regarding the test unit of the MH335DW I can say that the vocals sounded more bloated on them than the MH335DW themselves. That being said it may have been because of the tips used or something. The MH335DW has a much clearer vocal imaging than the test unit smily_headphones1.gif

Hi VZ

 

may I ask you ?

Why you choose alo sxc 24 , not 000 cable from fit ear for your MH 335 DW ?

please advice 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › The FitEar CIEM Impressions Thread