Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Aurisonics Impressions, Reviews & Discussions Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Aurisonics Impressions, Reviews & Discussions Thread - Page 246

post #3676 of 3678

I was an early Aurisonics adopter with the original ASG-1.  Unfortunately they were a huge disappointment for me and we just not the sound I was hoping for.  I realize I was not their intended audience for the voicing of the ASG-1.

 

So am I crazy for considering the ASG-2.5?  I recently tried the Westone W40 and UE900 and we not really impressed with either compared to my trusty ol' TF10. 

 

I really like the custom styled universal design and miss having dynamic drivers (Used the IE8 for two years).

 

I need a nudge in the right direction.  Thx!

post #3677 of 3678
Quote:
Originally Posted by dosley01 View Post

I was an early Aurisonics adopter with the original ASG-1.  Unfortunately they were a huge disappointment for me and we just not the sound I was hoping for.  I realize I was not their intended audience for the voicing of the ASG-1.

So am I crazy for considering the ASG-2.5?  I recently tried the Westone W40 and UE900 and we not really impressed with either compared to my trusty ol' TF10. 

I really like the custom styled universal design and miss having dynamic drivers (Used the IE8 for two years).

I need a nudge in the right direction.  Thx!

I wouldn't be overly concerned or taking a solid stance on Aurisonics because of ASG-1. I didnt find it my cup of tea. The ASG-2 at least is a monster hybrid, nothing like ASG-1. As for the 2.5, Uncle H20 might just have one coming his way soon. wink.gif
post #3678 of 3678
Quote:
Originally Posted by dosley01 View Post

I was an early Aurisonics adopter with the original ASG-1.  Unfortunately they were a huge disappointment for me and we just not the sound I was hoping for.  I realize I was not their intended audience for the voicing of the ASG-1.

So am I crazy for considering the ASG-2.5?  I recently tried the Westone W40 and UE900 and we not really impressed with either compared to my trusty ol' TF10. 

I really like the custom styled universal design and miss having dynamic drivers (Used the IE8 for two years).

I need a nudge in the right direction.  Thx!
Actually all the IEMs you've listed ranging from W40, UE900, TF10 have quite different sound signatures. W40 and UE900 shares a closer signature which is more balanced and flat. TF10 is more V shape emphasising on both ends. Bass on TF10 is more apparent than W40 and UE900. But with proper source, W40 and UE900 have got better sub bass extension. For the ASG2/2.5, it's another signature altogether. So no guarantees that you'll love them. The focus will be more on lows and mids with very great vocals. This can also bring about forward mids which can may not be to everybody's tastes. Mids and vocals are more apparent compared to TF10. It does not carry the treble energy found on the TF10.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Aurisonics Impressions, Reviews & Discussions Thread