Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sil3nce 
tempting, funny because I've been thinking of taking a plunge for these relatively new iems.
Hmm, detailed and bassy, sounds like a comparison vs the mdt/fx700 that needs to happen
I have a pair of MMDTs. Lets just say the reason why I decided to make this thread was my A/B comparison against them. I was completely surprised the Monster earphone which is a $305 MSRP earphone does not do a thing better than these. We are talking same source using a splitter..Bigger fuller more detailed and better balanced the CKS77 kinda showed up the Tributes. I was shocked actually. I was going into the comparison to see how close these CKS77 would be to them only to find out these sound superior to them.
On my CKM50 thread I did a test track with Vivaldis four season performance in a big music hall. The CKS77 it sounded like I was sitting in front row with just a huge sound and depth of the sound and that natural reverb in the recording was all encompassing as thick as it was wide. . The Tributes half the reverb was gone. I am telling you guys. The dual chambers. They look like frankenstein bolts sticking out of your ears but..This dual chamber throws the sound on these CKS77 on a different level. Big bold full sound. As much depth as there is width. I can't say that about any other earphone I have.
What was even more interesting is while earphones like the EX600 have their own qualities that I am sure everyone should know already. When A/Bing against this. That same recording in the music hall? Not even close. These sound completely 2 dimensional in comparison.. Guys that own Monster earphones know the appeal of the Monster sound is how thick the sounds are. Big bass, big sound.. Those have been out done and way cheaper even with better build made by Audio Technica.