The ATH-CKS77..Big, roomy, detailed, balanced, n I am not just talking about the bass. - Page 95
Gear mentioned in this thread:
I've just ordered the ATH-CKS99 from Amazon.jp and I've never bought any AT gear before. Thus I would like to know the opinion of others who have bought this. What does it sound like? Is it as good as what DsNuts says about the the little brother ATH-CKS77 or better?
I see that a newer version has come out, wonder what's different to the older one?
Just received the ATH-CKS99 and plugged it straight into the Samsung Note II. Using PowerAmp with 96kHz, 24bit FLAC files and the sound is simply amazing!
These are so comfortable compared to the Sony MH1C that I can easily wear these for hours without a problem. Microphonics are an issue and need to wear the cable behind to minimize it.
I have to thank Dsnuts on starting the ATH-CKS77 thread and eventually leading me to purchase the ATH-CKS99. Was considering giving up on in-ear monitors after the bad experience with the Sony MH1C and stick with headphones as a safe means for listening and enjoying music.
Great rec Dsnuts!
Had make this post at the discovery thread and thought I'll also ask for opinions here.
How' the mid bass of the CKS77X? Would appreciate some feedbacks if the mid bass is the driving force behind the sound or is it balanced with
the rest of the sond frequency.
If possible, I'll appreciate some thoughts if it's an upgrade from the old CKS90. If so, please kindly chip in with some differences between the 2. Or should I be looking at the CKS99 and CKS1000?
Thanks in advance.
That will be great. Thanks and look forward to your comparison.
The CKS line of phones are making decision making rather difficult as almost all impression for each individual models are mostly positive.
So, now the question is whether which would be the best value but clear upgrade for me coming from the CKS90LTD. I do really need more experience members here like you and others to chip in to help me in making a well informed decision.