Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › Altmann Tera Player
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Altmann Tera Player - Page 121  

post #1801 of 1958

Did anyone compare TP with another minimalist SD card player such as SDTrans 384 by any chance?

 

Quote:
Is there any product good for playing digital audio? People often ask.
 
The answer may be yes when a project in diyaudio emerges. The SDTrans 384 developed by two Japanese Chiaki and Bunpei.
It's an ugly DIY looked thing with a beautiful design and implementation. The rationale is simple, minimalism.
8 bit MCU+FPGA+ultra low jitter oscillator+SDCard reader=SDTrans384.
Lowest voltage is required, only 5v.
As a result, no stupid bulky os, just configuring FPGA. SD card stores huge amount of CD's but no vibration at all at time of reading.
It can read PCM files(wav only) and amazingly DFF files (DXD) in native form, as different from those converted into PCM.
It has no DAC. DAC is another topic. Remember even traditional CD player splits down into two parts, CD transport and DAC.
SD Trans 384 demonstrates the possibility of good standalone digital music player in the simplest form, a perfect replacement of CD players.
Quality of music playback is at least comparable with good CD players on red book format, if not better than.
Sadly though this is just a DIY project already finished, yet many want to see a commercial product building on their design.

 

http://www.head-fi.org/t/634476/thoughts-on-computer-audio

 


 

So far majority of them should be sold domestically in Japan and here is a thread with discussions in English

 

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digital-source/142562-microsd-memory-card-transport-project.html

 

Some pictures available here

 

http://www.chiaki.cc/Transport/sdtrans192.html

 

http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/hcdry919/7897044.html

 

http://tackbon.ldblog.jp/archives/52291825.html

 

Just thinking out loud and wondering what would inspire Charles to work on another "Altmann Peta-Player" with 1-bit/2.8MHz DSD support.

 

Thanks.

post #1802 of 1958

Don't know much about all that you just said there, but I was under the assumption that Charles didnt like DSD. Read over his mother-of-tone pages. Should find it there in the Conversion Techniques section....

Quote:
Originally Posted by seeteeyou View Post

Did anyone compare TP with another minimalist SD card player such as SDTrans 384 by any chance?

 

 

http://www.head-fi.org/t/634476/thoughts-on-computer-audio

 


 

So far majority of them should be sold domestically in Japan and here is a thread with discussions in English

 

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digital-source/142562-microsd-memory-card-transport-project.html

 

Some pictures available here

 

http://www.chiaki.cc/Transport/sdtrans192.html

 

http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/hcdry919/7897044.html

 

http://tackbon.ldblog.jp/archives/52291825.html

 

Just thinking out loud and wondering what would inspire Charles to work on another "Altmann Peta-Player" with 1-bit/2.8MHz DSD support.

 

Thanks.

post #1803 of 1958

Kenman, you are right :)

 

I think the best way to play back DSD is to convert it to 176.4 kHz wav.

 

Almost all of the DSD's start as .wav anyway (in the recording studio).

 

DSD is a non-format, but that is only my opinion.

post #1804 of 1958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirmalanow View Post

I wonder if it is like the brainwave biofeedback I did a long time ago, where if I tried to increase the amount of a particular brainwave frequency to get more positive feedback, the amount of feedback would actually decrease. It seemed like simply directing my attention at the feedback signal without "trying" to make anything happen, would actually result gradually in an increase in the desired brainwave pattern.

 

So maybe the best way to win in your competition would be to not try!

 

Hi Nirmala, 

 

if I get you right, you mean that the focus on the 'desired output' is very close to the focus on the 'lack of the desired output', and therefore one should just try to be in  a relaxed appreciative state ?

 

Charles :)

post #1805 of 1958

So as I understand it, 1-bit encoding is basically meant for these Sigma-Delta DAC's, yes? So they are using the idea of taking an average in a certain length of time of the 1-bit being 0 or 5 volts and thats the intended output. You say this adds in noise, and that you don't like the sound of DSD audio, but if you convert it to WAV, in a way where you analyze the data as a whole to find it's true intended voltages, could you eliminate some of that noise introduced by this storage method? Or will it still have a similar sound because it was converted from a 1-bit encoding method? I'm kinda curious

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chucky-X View Post

Kenman, you are right :)

 

I think the best way to play back DSD is to convert it to 176.4 kHz wav.

 

Almost all of the DSD's start as .wav anyway (in the recording studio).

 

DSD is a non-format, but that is only my opinion.

post #1806 of 1958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chucky-X View Post

 

Hi Nirmala, 

 

if I get you right, you mean that the focus on the 'desired output' is very close to the focus on the 'lack of the desired output', and therefore one should just try to be in  a relaxed appreciative state ?

 

Charles :)


That sounds about right, but it gets subtle because it did not even work to "try" to not try. When I was hooked up to the brainwave biofeedback, I would often first try everything to affect the feedback signal including trying not to do anything. And nothing worked. So after a while I would get distracted or just give up, and then gradually the amount of positive feedback the system was providing would increase. It seemed that the process was happening outside of my usual conscious mind, and there was simply nothing I could do about it.

 

However, the feedback worked in the sense that the quantity of the desired brainwave frequency would increase during each session. I was training to boost beta waves, and I also felt that the feedback sessions "woke up" my brain. I was much more productive and able to concentrate all through the day.

 

Some researchers related this kind of process to sound frequencies also. Everyone's voice print is unique because there are missing frequencies. Some folks feed the missing frequencies back into the body via music using headphones and sound tables (a massage table with speakers or subwoofers) and find a therapeutic effect. Here is one place that seems to be doing something like that: http://www.biowaves.com/Info/WhatIsSound.php

 

It seems our system benefits when we provide the missing frequencies, and of course listening to music does this in a more random way for everyone. Maybe that is why we enjoy it so much!

post #1807 of 1958

Hello! I`m from Russia, Moscow and i especially sign up at this forum, because i really can`t understand why there is no measurements of Tera Player.

Can anybody to do standart RMAA measurements of Tera Player?

I can`t find it at Web and it strange 4 me very much.

I agree with head-fi member Scamp`s opinion and i think that indeed Tera player measurements were made by many people, but in reality measurements was terrible.

So we`ll never see it because to publish such results of RMAA mean that all praise of Tera Player sound was placebo (Price, price, price and made in Germany).

It`s very sadly surmise but i really think so.

 

Thanks, sorry 4 my bad english.

post #1808 of 1958
Quote:
Originally Posted by FALEEV View Post

Hello! I`m from Russia, Moscow and i especially sign up at this forum, because i really can`t understand why there is no measurements of Tera Player.

Can anybody to do standart RMAA measurements of Tera Player?

I can`t find it at Web and it strange 4 me very much.

I agree with head-fi member Scamp`s opinion and i think that indeed Tera player measurements were made by many people, but in reality measurements was terrible.

So we`ll never see it because to publish such results of RMAA mean that all praise of Tera Player sound was placebo (Price, price, price and made in Germany).

It`s very sadly surmise but i really think so.


Thanks, sorry 4 my bad english.

Not a real polite introduction to Head-Fi!
post #1809 of 1958
Do we really have to go through this again??

I would really respect a negative opinion of the player from someone who has listened to it and compared it to other device(s), and after such did not like it (and could explain why). Aamof, I invite such a comparison/critique. Because I would like to hear the device they would prefer.

In the meantime, I'm waiting on a delayed flight getting lost in the music with my Tera. I would dance... but they might escort me out of the airport. wink.gif


Quote:
Originally Posted by FALEEV View Post

Hello! I`m from Russia, Moscow and i especially sign up at this forum, because i really can`t understand why there is no measurements of Tera Player.

Can anybody to do standart RMAA measurements of Tera Player?

I can`t find it at Web and it strange 4 me very much.

I agree with head-fi member Scamp`s opinion and i think that indeed Tera player measurements were made by many people, but in reality measurements was terrible.

So we`ll never see it because to publish such results of RMAA mean that all praise of Tera Player sound was placebo (Price, price, price and made in Germany).

It`s very sadly surmise but i really think so.


Thanks, sorry 4 my bad english.
post #1810 of 1958

FALEEV,

 

Oh dear, why are you fixated on an issue that's been discussed ad naseum in this thread? Reiterating the `measurements are everything' nonsense is patently ridiculous and does your first head-fi post no favors whatsoever. 

 

Andy. 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by FALEEV View Post

Hello! I`m from Russia, Moscow and i especially sign up at this forum, because i really can`t understand why there is no measurements of Tera Player.

Can anybody to do standart RMAA measurements of Tera Player?

I can`t find it at Web and it strange 4 me very much.

I agree with head-fi member Scamp`s opinion and i think that indeed Tera player measurements were made by many people, but in reality measurements was terrible.

So we`ll never see it because to publish such results of RMAA mean that all praise of Tera Player sound was placebo (Price, price, price and made in Germany).

It`s very sadly surmise but i really think so.

 

Thanks, sorry 4 my bad english.

post #1811 of 1958

To confirm my version why we have no any measurements of Tera Player i`d like to say:

 

For example when Iriver AK100 starts on sale so many people have made measurements of AK100.

And nobody feared to publish it. 

 

So situation with non-availability of any measurements Tera Player is very strange.

 

P.S. Sorry for my bad english (i`m Russian)

 

smial1966, why do u allways writes bold text like forum`s moderator?bigsmile_face.gif


Edited by FALEEV - 2/26/13 at 11:37am
post #1812 of 1958
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodcans View Post

I would really respect a negative opinion of the player from someone who has listened to it and compared it to other device(s), and after such did not like it (and could explain why). Aamof, I invite such a comparison/critique. Because I would like to hear the device they would prefer.

As u know to listen Tera and compare with other devices 1`st of all we need to get it.

But till Tera will be unique device with more than not cheap price this situation with having no measurements will continue until we see measurements of Tera Player.


Edited by FALEEV - 2/26/13 at 11:52am
post #1813 of 1958
I have owned both the rwak and the Tera. To my ears, I prefer the Tera. And not by a small margin. So from a SQ perspective, you can show me any graph you want my eyes to see. My ears will still not care.


Quote:
Originally Posted by FALEEV View Post

To confirm my version why we have no any measurements of Tera Player i`d like to say:

For example when Iriver AK100 starts on sale so many people have made measurements of AK100.
And nobody feared to publish it. 

So situation with non-availability of any measurements Tera Player is very strange.


P.S. Sorry for my bad english (i`m Russian)


smial1966
, why do u allways writes bold text like forum`s moderator?bigsmile_face.gif
post #1814 of 1958
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodcans View Post

I have owned both the rwak and the Tera. To my ears, I prefer the Tera. And not by a small margin. So from a SQ perspective, you can show me any graph you want my eyes to see. My ears will still not care.

In my opinion u had compare delta-sigma DAC vs Multibit DAC R-2R

it`s imcomparable things initially.

post #1815 of 1958
Which dap are you saying will sound better? Please lmk and I will attempt an audition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FALEEV View Post

In my opinion u had compare delta-sigma DAC vs Multibit DAC R-2R
it`s imcomparable things initially.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Portable Source Gear
This thread is locked  
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › Altmann Tera Player