Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Monster Beats Pro - A Full Review
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Monster Beats Pro - A Full Review - Page 2

post #16 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioserf View Post

Can get these for $200, debating between that or the M50s. Upgrading from Beats Studios and kind of want something different, but was happy with the Studios.


In you use the Studios on the go, I would actually stick with that since they are much more comfortable and isolate better.

 

For something different, and I mean COMPLETELY different, you should take a look at open headphones like the HD 598s.

 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shogunner View Post


Yea, it just makes you look like a tool :P

 


I personally don't wear full sized headphones outside anyway wink.gif

 



Quote:
Originally Posted by LizardKing1 View Post


 

Good review. Not sure about the "people who don't like them probably never tried them". I live in a country where in the capital there are 3 places to try AKGs. I only know 1 place to try the K702/701, and believe I've looked. Despite all this, I have no problem finding the entire Beats line-up. The bandwagon effect might be true, so maybe it's more accurate to say "most Beats bashers have their objective discernment clouded by the norm here at Head-Fi, which is to bash".

 

The reason why I quoted is because I don't truly agree with this logic. The fact that the 'average consumer' usually can't take 5 minutes to research anything doesn't excuse the Beats terrible price-quality ratio. An over-priced or bad headphone is nothing but that. It doesn't matter in the slightest how marketed or easily accessible it is, because that will never make it any better. Qualities are an objective thing, it either reproduces sound well (or in case of 'fun' signatures, what the majority thinks is well) or it doesn't. And when compared to other models, the price is either fair or it isn't. Saying "these are over-priced, but because consumers are stupid these are good" just isn't right, because marketing can't change a driver.



The same consumer who buy without researching probably did so because "it looks cool". Price to quality is terrible no doubt, but maybe price to style + sound quality might not be that bad tongue.gif

post #17 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by crinacle View Post

Personally, I really like the Pro. It is definitely superior to the M50, SRH840, HFI-580, all those "entry level" audiophile headphones. But the fact that you can get a D2000 for cheaper, when the difference in sound quality is so large, is pretty much a dealbreaker considering that they have very similar sound signatures.

 

Then again, $200 for them Pros are definitely within "audiophile price-to-performance ratio". $400? Beats can go suck my (headphone) jack.



So you think the Beats are better than the M50, SRH840 and HFI580 and you think the D2000 is way better than the Beats.  Wow.  I think the M50 and SRH840 are better than the D2000 by a long ways.  We have very different ears (or more likely very different brains)

post #18 of 34

Different strokes for different folks; there is no universal "grading system" for "good, better, best" despite many people's attempt at establishing such a "low-fi - mid-fi - hi-fi" chain that puts their favorites on the top and their least favorites on the bottom; and I'm fully aware that many headphones that I really like are considered crap by a lot of people, but they don't have to live with them - I do. So I pick something(s) that I'm going to be happy with in six months, or a year, or ten years; I hope everyone else does as well. 

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhythmdevils View Post



So you think the Beats are better than the M50, SRH840 and HFI580 and you think the D2000 is way better than the Beats.  Wow.  I think the M50 and SRH840 are better than the D2000 by a long ways.  We have very different ears (or more likely very different brains)



 

post #19 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhythmdevils View Post



So you think the Beats are better than the M50, SRH840 and HFI580 and you think the D2000 is way better than the Beats.  Wow.  I think the M50 and SRH840 are better than the D2000 by a long ways.  We have very different ears (or more likely very different brains)



 

Different, we sure are.

post #20 of 34
I never said the Pros suck, they're just $150 cans selling for $400. Now, the Solos and Studios? They suck. wink.gif
post #21 of 34

They're a steal for a hundred bucks, I wouldn't mind buying them at that price either. 

post #22 of 34
Sure, I'd pay a c-note for Pros, no question. I paid $40 for my direct-from-China fake Studios, they sound like crap but they look nice. biggrin.gif
post #23 of 34

Good information to know, I've never seen the pros on display to audition so I can't say anything about them.  At $100 though it does seem like they wouldn't be a bad choice competing with other headphones in that range.  Even though I didn't like what I heard out of studios and solos, I'd be interested in giving them a listen to hear how they compare to my hfi-580 and lp2.

post #24 of 34

For the $100 bucks you paid, you either bought fakes or you came up on that deal that was posted on slickdeals. Anyways, I dont agree with anything you said about these headphones in your review. I bought mine from bestbuy brand new, so they are legit. and when compared to my pro700's, Hands down my pro700's take the win. The bass is boomy, the highs and mids are really not that clear when compared to my pro700's. I bought the pro700's expecting them to be ok, but not better than my beats pro. But now, the beats have been set aside and the pro700's have become my main headphones to go to when it comes to djing or just working around the house or when going to the gym. 

post #25 of 34

I actually think both of you are right on the money; the OP just took a less biased approach to his impressions. Comparatively, the M50's(closest I could get to the Pro700's) come across sounding noticably brighter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by deviusdragger View Post

For the $100 bucks you paid, you either bought fakes or you came up on that deal that was posted on slickdeals. Anyways, I dont agree with anything you said about these headphones in your review. I bought mine from bestbuy brand new, so they are legit. and when compared to my pro700's, Hands down my pro700's take the win. The bass is boomy, the highs and mids are really not that clear when compared to my pro700's. I bought the pro700's expecting them to be ok, but not better than my beats pro. But now, the beats have been set aside and the pro700's have become my main headphones to go to when it comes to djing or just working around the house or when going to the gym. 



 

post #26 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magick Man View Post

Sure, I'd pay a c-note for Pros, no question. I paid $40 for my direct-from-China fake Studios, they sound like crap but they look nice. :D


Hi-5 man. 

post #27 of 34

I paid 100 dollars for this.  It's a turd, but it looks really cool so I think I got a great deal.  It makes me look like a turd when I wear it but at least it shows that I have money to waste on gold coated turds. 

 

golden-turd.jpg

post #28 of 34

Can you please write a review on the gold turd please. I heard gold turds can be pretty "bright", eh eh get it? :)

post #29 of 34

They sounded alright but the tiny soundstage turned me off :\

post #30 of 34

Sounds like sh1t to be honest.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Monster Beats Pro - A Full Review