So my impression from reading all the replies is that Beats and Bose have really bad sound quality, and by that I'm not saying music sounds crappy in them, but for the price they are bad, apparently they are greatly overpriced. I guess that's it, so in conclusion, those headphones suck (as of, there are much better things to buy with such money). Even though i still have to use them for myself, lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thedjswn 
The truth is that neither bose nor beats are bad headphones. Just as Justine Beiber is actually a good singer. Is he the best singer? Well, no. But he is a good singer, he just sings "teeny -bopper" "pop" songs. and so he is very popular. He's good, but he's not Bob Dylan, or the Beatles. His appeal is to a specific audience who are willing to pay a lot of money to see Him perform. Those that are not his target audience, just don't get it, and don't understand why anyone would fork over that much money to see him.
It's the same with Bose and Beats. they are very different headphones, and they are marketed to a specific audience. Bose utilizes a lot of phsychoacoustics, these makes their headphones sound better than they actually are. People think that they are hearing frequencies that aren't actually there. Beats are marketed towards more of a Hip hop/pop audience, and face it, they do look cool. A lot of effort was put into exactly that, making them look cool. and they do sound better than most consumer headphones. Are there "better" headphones at the same price, if not less? Sure there are, heck i was just listening to some skullcandy aviators and was actual kinda impressed, I think they are much better phones than Beats or Bose, but that's my opinion. what i think is better is not necessarily the same as what some one else thinks is better. the reason Bose and Beats charge so much, is because they can. people are willing to pay for them. Some people genuinely enjoy their Bose, or Beats headphones, and they can't understand someone paying $1400 and up for hd800's or an lcd-2. to them, audiophiles are the crazy ones.
Psychoacoustics? WOW, that sounds crazy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychoacoustics --> TL;DR, haha.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
shorty920 
Bose and Beats have been bashed, ridiculed, and brought up in just about every other thread in here in this forum's existence, that's probably why people aren't so enthusiastic about talking about it anymore (save new members). You will commonly see comments like "I want bass like the Beats, but want better AQ in other areas too"
I don't own beats nor do I intend to ever, but I have to admit that I like the new colored Beats that are out. The Blue ones do look sick...
Honestly i dont see what's so good about their design, besides, I am not the kind of person who would rather get style with headphones which imo are not dressing accessories, so it doesnt seem good idea to pay for that instead of quality sound, but oh well, to each their own.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kanashimu 
Excuse me?
Justin Bieber is actually multi-talented (not only singer/performer, but can play multiple instruments).
He also actually earned his fame through his Youtube clips of his music.
Finally, even if you prefer [insert whatever artist you like] to Justin Bieber, that doesn't make him bad.
Please don't spout utter nonsense when you have no idea of what you're talking about.
http://screenshooter.net/1100894/aornjxo --> Lyrics "Baby baby baby, oh baby baby baby"
Are you ******* kidding me?
Just because he is a lucky ass boy born with a perfect voice he is not a great artist. A singer he may be, but artist? pffft
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Eric_C 
"Barely mentioned"? Have you tried searching either brand on Head-Fi?
Long ago I made a thread asking for headphones, with a pricerange about 150-350 bucks, a lot of headphones were mentioned, none were Bose nor Beatz
Edited by Howlgram - 2/15/12 at 2:05pm