If someone is able to give me a link where i can buy a cable micro b to mini a for the FiiOE07K i can test the Xperia J and some more.
I can't find it and
It's kinda like the 10th time i'm asking
If someone is able to give me a link where i can buy a cable micro b to mini a for the FiiOE07K i can test the Xperia J and some more.
I can't find it and
It's kinda like the 10th time i'm asking
Thank you so much for the information DanBa! This thread is so great and I am hopefully soon gonna try pairing my Galaxy S3(4G) with Leckerton UHA-6 mkii!

I've tried searching this thread but couldn't find the info on the following but would it be correct that for the Galaxy S3 if :-
1) non-OTG cable is used with something like the VentureCraft Go-DAP X, it's USB Audio-enabled Android mode
- the VentureCraft Go-DAP X won't be draining or siphoning the battery off the Galaxy S3
2) OTG cable is used then it's USB Host-enabled Android mode
- the USB DAC/Amp will be draining or siphoning the battery off the Galaxy S3?
Apologies if this is a silly question.

According to wikipedia, is impossible to have a micro b to mini b usb cable.
Have a look:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Serial_Bus#Mini_and_Micro_connectors
BTW, sent my Pico back to Justin to get the compatibility issue fixed, will post back here when it returns and I have a chance to test it.

DanBa, are there any counter-examples to the DACport's dilemma that they explain here...
Yesterday we spoke about difficulties we’ve faced in getting the HiFi-M8 paired up with number of phones from Nokia and Samsung.
Recently, we’ve been looking closely at a number of phones from the Android family and have been noticing something rather disconcerting.
It would appear that a lot of phones don’t know how to handle a USB audio device (DAC) that announces itself as 192 kHz-capable. That is what HiFi-M8 does, because it supports everything all the way up to 192 on the USB bus.
http://centrance.com/products/new/blog/2013/01/18/phones-and-tablets-vol-2/



DAC chip != DAC Unit performance
Implementation is king.


Absolutely agree.. I see the UHA-6S MKII's DAC implementation get badmouthed quite a bit.. and it's almost become an echo chamber argument of sorts between some members. I find the built-in DAC certainly above average.. and not all that far behind the ODAC, really. There's more than a few respected, well-informed members I've talked with who would agree.
Comparing the ODAC+UHA's amp vs the UHA's DAC+amp, the ODAC/UHA rig is more resolving, dynamic, and tonally precise.. but the UHA DAC+amp is no slouch, in my estimation. In fact, there's something to be said for the synergy between the UHA's built-in DAC implementation & the amp side's OPA209 chip. I've found the built-in DAC to deliver some smoothness and provide a little better soundstage width.. things that are quite complimentary to the OPA209 opamps presentation.
Exaggerated is precisely what the negative criticism surrounding the UHA's DAC is. Is it the end all be all, no? But 'holding back' the amp section & getting treated as an "afterthought" ? IME: hardly.

DanBa, are there any counter-examples to the DACport's dilemma that they explain here...
http://centrance.com/products/new/blog/2013/01/18/phones-and-tablets-vol-2/

then how u explain that the e07k which is 96 khz capable is working with note 2 "us variant only" without usb audio recorder. i dunno why its not working with note 2 international T_T , i m really confused why US note 2 capable while international note 2 cant do it.... =.=.





