Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Shure SE-315 may cause cancer? DIdn't expect that..
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Shure SE-315 may cause cancer? DIdn't expect that..

post #1 of 28
Thread Starter 

So I just recently ordered my Shure SE-315 and I can't wait to get my hands on it.. smily_headphones1.gif There is a chance that I might have to wait a till April to get it and that seems painful.

 

Every now and again, I google for the SE315 and read stuff about it to appease my desire to have the SR315s and today I was reading through Shure's broshure and SE 315 usage guide. To my surprise, this is what it says at the bottom.

 

Quote:
WARNING: This product contains a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.

 

Am I the only one who found that funny, odd, unexpected and surprising? blink.gif Honestly, it's one of the weirdest things I've ever read (we don't have such notices on Indian products.. I've never read the manuals in detail but this is the first I've heard of a pair of earphones causing cancer).

 

Did anyone else ever read something like this? Thoughts? tongue.gif

 

Link to the user guide: http://www.shure.com/idc/groups/tech_pubs/@global_managed/documents/webcontent/pdf_en_se315_earphones_ug.pdf


Edited by JAnderton - 2/2/12 at 11:07am
post #2 of 28

Are you shure ?

 

post #3 of 28

I am going to get prego, buy these, then sue them. This should be great since I am a guy.

post #4 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAnderton View Post

So I just recently ordered my Shure SE-315 and I can't wait to get my hands on it.. smily_headphones1.gif  There is a chance that I might have to wait a till April to get it and that seems painful.

Every now and again, I google for the SE315 and read stuff about it to appease my desire to have the SR315s and today I was reading through Shure's broshure and SE 315 usage guide. To my surprise, this is what it says at the bottom.


Am I the only one who found that funny, odd, unexpected and surprising? blink.gif  Honestly, it's one of the weirdest things I've ever read (we don't have such notices on Indian products.. I've never read the manuals in detail but this is the first I've heard of a pair of earphones causing cancer).

Did anyone else ever read something like this? Thoughts? tongue.gif

Link to the user guide: http://www.shure.com/idc/groups/tech_pubs/@global_managed/documents/webcontent/pdf_en_se315_earphones_ug.pdfhttp://www.shure.com/idc/groups/tech_pubs/@global_managed/documents/webcontent/pdf_en_se315_earphones_ug.pdf

It's fairly standard in California to add that warning. It will be on the door of a building if there's anything, anything that has been shown to cause cancer in any test. It's on the pumps at the gas station, for heaven's sake. I wouldn't worry.
post #5 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by rroseperry View Post


It's fairly standard in California to add that warning. It will be on the door of a building if there's anything, anything that has been shown to cause cancer in any test. It's on the pumps at the gas station, for heaven's sake. I wouldn't worry.


Do you think I could win a lawsuit if I said I cant read?

post #6 of 28

Well, you're not in the State of California, don't worry!

post #7 of 28

It seems weird, but I've seen that little notice on a lot of weird things. It's nothing to worry about since it's not something you consume; I'd be hesitant if I saw that at a restaurant or something... 

If something is going to be sold in California, the product has to been "clean" or have this notice somewhere. I'm sure companies include it in everything so they only have to print one version. 

post #8 of 28
guys, it has to be something within the earpieces, or maybe they apply a thin layer of lubricant group at the factory to prevent corrosion of internal components. Or maybe a trace of lead inside. This is enough to warrant the labeling for california
post #9 of 28

It's most likely the solder for the wires. Don't freak out. We Californians just like full disclosure.

post #10 of 28

Stay away from those. get TF10 they never hurt anyone.

post #11 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesMcProgger View Post

Stay away from those. get TF10 they never hurt anyone.


WARNING: The shape and fit of the TF10 is known to the member tomscy2000 to cause pain and suffering to the ears! tongue_smile.gif

 

post #12 of 28

There's a reason those warnings say "known in the State of California" and not "known in the United States"....the other 49 states never found it to be a problem worth looking into. 

 

California has all sorts of crazy labeling requirements that a manufacturer must include to be able to sell the product in California.  It's not that the product doesn't contain "cancer causing agents"...most products do in trace amounts.  But not in concentrations to actually cause a health concern, and California's poorly worded labeling law doesn't actually specify that it has to be in a certain concentration to require labeling.

 

There's lead in the solder, usually cable jackets were made with some percentage of lead (all cables), most of most products is made with petroleum and plasticizers, and the foam rubber ear pieces were cured with chemicals of one form or another.   Of course, in a solid state, none of that actually presents a problem, nor does the lead unless you plan on eating your wires or diluting them in your drinking water...  I don't think I've bought anything electronic in the last year that didn't have that warning somewhere on it.   If you plan on vaporizing the headphones in a fire....well...that could be more problematic...

post #13 of 28

Did State of California make the same warnings in things like "KFC fried chicken"??

 

 I'm not kidding, but  asking,  because if  they are so strict in Shure, also should be on things that are bad for prolonged exposure.

 

kfcok1.jpg?w=535

post #14 of 28
Thread Starter 

rofl.. For those who thought that I was actually confirmed, I'd like to say I'm not. I know that the laws in the US are different (to those here) and quite a few times service providers/manufacturers have to state such things.. it's just new for me. I never expected a earphone to have these warnings so I thought I should share it with you guys for a discussion/laugh :)

 

At no point was I actually concerned. I did find it a bit funny :)

post #15 of 28

 

Quote:

Did State of California make the same warnings in things like "KFC fried chicken"??

 

 I'm not kidding, but  asking,  because if  they are so strict in Shure, also should be on things that are bad for prolonged exposure.

 

If they haven't outright banned KFC from operation in CA, no doubt, there's no less than 6 different bills that will try, and a dozen that have only narrowly escaped passing in the past...

 

...I mock CA lovingly....on the opposite coast we're starting to show more severe symptoms on the madness as well (the "sugary softdrink tax" comes to mind....which I have to laugh at considering the disconnect between the politicians and the planet Earth.  What was the last softdrink you had that actually contained any sugar whatsoever?  No, they all have corn syrup instead...  So I'm wondering what softdrinks would be taxed?  Presumably upscale sodas from small bottling companies, definitely not the majors.)

 

To follow the headphone warnings, I'm wondering how music is ever made in CA.  You shouldn't use headphones, they're toxic.  You shouldn't run speaker cables, they're toxic.  You shouldn't buy CDs, they're toxic.  You shouldn't buy digital downloads, the servers that provide them are made of toxic things.  You can go to a live concert, but the concert shouldn't be amplified because the cabling, amps, and mixing boards are toxic.  The musicians can play acoustic instruments....but the strings were probably treated with toxc substances that may or may not contain lead or mercury.  The venue shouldn't be illuminated because the light bulbs are toxic.  :)  "Welcome to California: State animal?  The Unicorn.  It's real, we swear!" :)

 

It's one of those things that, the idea made sense, a product that contains potentially DANGEROUS levels of toxic substances should be labeled as such.  Products that achieve dangerous levels of toxic substances on their own probably shouldn't be sold to begin with.  But as-is an open ended labeling requirement makes the actual point of it meaningless.  There are almost zero manufactured products that contain zero percent of anything at all toxic, which means virtually every manufactured product has to be labeled as toxic.  And nobody actually reads or cares about the warning because it's the same warning they've seen on everything else they bought, so if they buy something that actually is packed with depleted uranium, they'll still be as oblivious to it as if it had no label at all.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Shure SE-315 may cause cancer? DIdn't expect that..