Edited by turokrocks - 3/30/12 at 4:23am
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Chomping at the bit, are we?
You'll just have to wait until Monday...
What is the intent of this post?
Can someone create a singular "iBasso DX100: Post Your Impressions' thread and a mod merge the others into it? I appreciate people will want to share their experience but it creates less clutter and is much easier to read through one thread rather than hunting down several different ones.
I wished instead of the volume there was a </>, it looks so Russian and industrial...
This does not look like this , color wise...
The silver & black version reminds me of cheap "mid" or "low" fi audio equipment.(could be the reason they decided not to go with that color scheme). Let's be honest here for a second, this DAP was designed to appeal to the "upscale" audio crowd. The equipment should look understated & not scream "Look at me". It's more about "function" not "form". If you don't care for the looks you can always put some decals or a "skin" of some sort on it(of course you might not like how it looks in a year or 5 down the road) (I don't get fashion-fi I guess, it's completely about the sound for me. No sense in advertizing for thiefs "look at this, little gem")

The silver & black version reminds me of cheap "mid" or "low" fi audio equipment.(could be the reason they decided not to go with that color scheme). Let's be honest here for a second, this DAP was designed to appeal to the "upscale" audio crowd. The equipment should look understated & not scream "Look at me". It's more about "function" not "form". If you don't care for the looks you can always put some decals or a "skin" of some sort on it(of course you might not like how it looks in a year or 5 down the road) (I don't get fashion-fi I guess, it's completely about the sound for me. No sense in advertizing for thiefs "look at this, little gem")
You have a point there, but the way they advertised (Photos) it is false and different to what we are seeing...this is what I meant.
Does this feature graphic EQ? Looks sturdy. Is it better sounding the Colorfly's wooden one?
I've been surprised by the Colorfly, and the Hifiman, basically as I had only experience with one other 'audiophile' player before (apart from the famous Kenwood and a slew of MD and DAC that don't count because they are from large companies that just don't understand audiophiles at all
), but the Colorfly has the Hifiman signature, dark, thick, but is freer of hiss than the Hifiman is. The background is so clean, I would almost swear it was made by a non-audiophile company.
Whether that sound works for every situation (the darkness, that is) and your phones is one thing.
The impression I get from iBasso (and I own or have owned a number of their amps), is that they work on actual, accurate sound models rather than audiophile sound models, meaning: the DX100 I expect, should have a linear output, very unlike Hifiman or CK, which obviously roll off the high end to sound 'lush' and dark, and intoxicating or something. Not that those are bad qualities, especially in the audiophile world, but they are unnatural, disingenuous inflections of the original recording. Now, iBasso could roll like their colleagues, but who knows. I have high hopes.