Quote:
Originally Posted by
olear 
After selling FXT90 and realizing that I missed how well they do many things, I ordered another pair.
Although both the FXT90 and TF10 have a lot of energy, I feel they are different enough to enjoy both.
I just wonder if FX700 would be too aggressive in its treble/bass, with lack of mids compared with FXT90.
I actually think that the FX700 is less aggressive than the FXT90, who's presentation is significantly more forward and places you very close to the music. In comparison, the FX700 places you further away, giving the impression of live music played on a stage. The FXT90s also have a much narrower sound stage (though I'd say the two are equal in depth), giving the music a more 'in-your-face' feel. Personally I feel that these are trade-offs rather than weaknesses on the FXT90s part, as both presentations are enjoyable in equal measures.
The FX-700 displays significantly more detail retrieval in all areas of the frequency spectrum, but particularly treble and bass. What makes it such a good IEM is that it does this without sounding analytical, cold, or soul-less. The FXT90 is less refined and puts more emphasis on the sound as a whole, creating an excellent sense of cohesion.
I'n summary, I'd say the FX-700 puts emphasis on coherance, whilst the FXT90 puts more emphasis on cohesion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lee730 
Coming from the IE8 I was also worried about that. The fact is I preferred the more aggressive sound the FX700 gives. Its not aggressive in the sense where I get sibilance like on the EX1000 (to these ears the EX1000 was much more aggressive in the treble range). The FX700 is also amazing for low volume listening. The imaging is amazing at even low volumes. With the EX1000 I was not satisfied with such low volume listening and when I turned it up a bit the sibilance got way worse. The mid range really isn't recessed but neutral. Its Bass and treble give the illusion though as it is quite more emphasized when compared to its mid range. With the proper source and tips the mid range is quite forward and detailed IMO. All I can say is if you don't find the TF10s treble range bothersome then you should really have no issue with the FX700s treble ;) The FX500 may be different though as its treble is quite scratchy and harsh in comparison to its bigger sister.
Agreed. The imaging is remarkable, and that timbre... wow. Coming from the FXT90 to the FX-700s, the mids do sound a bit recessed, but like you say, this is more than likely due to the treble and bass emphasis. Out of interest, what source and tips are you using?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RokYa 
Good point Nulliverse. Which tips are recommended for the FXT90? I was thinking maybe some Complys?
I've heard very good reports from people using Complys Ts-400s, but equally good reports from people using Monster Supertips (foam), Ultimate Ears single flange and MEElectronics double flange. I've tried all of the above and am currently using JAYS single flange, which are definitely my favorite so far.