Weird. I found the M50s to be boring, and my experience with the 780s was that they were very punchy.
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Bass Question... Audio-Technica ATHM50S vs Ultrasone HFI-780
Bass Question... Audio-Technica ATHM50S vs Ultrasone HFI-780 - Page 2
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
post #16 of 23
1/6/12 at 3:06pm
Gear mentioned in this thread:
post #17 of 23
1/6/12 at 3:33pm
post #18 of 23
1/6/12 at 5:35pm
post #20 of 23
1/7/12 at 2:56am
post #21 of 23
1/7/12 at 9:20am
post #22 of 23
1/7/12 at 5:44pm
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Bass Question... Audio-Technica ATHM50S vs Ultrasone HFI-780



















). In my opinion the ATH-M50 has a deeper bass and maybe more detailed, but it isn't that present in the music. It's more of a clinical bass: look, here is a perfect 70Hz tone! But the bass isn't musical, there is little impact. The HFI-780 do not swim in bass, but they aren't shy of it at all either. Probably slightly bassier than neutral phones would be. But their bass is very musical and fun, so I'd pick the HFI-780 over the ATH-M50 every day.
