Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Sound Blaster X-Fi HD or Fiios E10
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sound Blaster X-Fi HD or Fiios E10

post #1 of 16
Thread Starter 

I need a DAC for my laptop, but would also like to use it for gaming on my PS3 to help power my headphones. I have recently been admiring the e10, however, I stumbled upon the Sound Blaster X-Fi HD on Amazon for about the same price. The inputs and outputs of the X-Fi HD would make it more desirable, but the main purpose would be for music/movies from my laptop.

So my question is; can the X-Fi HD's DAC compete with that of the e10?

Also, could I connect the e10 to the PS3 via usb and use the e10 like that?
Any input would be greatly appreciated. 

 

Edit: Link to the exact X-Fi model I am considering 
http://www.amazon.com/Creative-Sound-Blaster-System-SB1240/dp/B004275EO4/ref=cm_rdp_product


Edited by potatoos - 1/1/12 at 6:48pm

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #2 of 16

I would be interested in knowing this as well. Any input would be wonderful.

post #3 of 16
Thread Starter 

Well, I think that I realized something. The PS3 only outputs game audio through the analog (red/white) and optical (toslink) outputs. Usb can only put out chat audio. Knowing that, I need a dac/amp which can take input from a toslink or analog signal. The X-Fi linked above can take analog inputs (I think at least) while the e10 can only use usb. The dilemma still stands.

post #4 of 16

Astro Mix-Amp.

post #5 of 16

X-Fi HD is more PC only, it can't be used as a standalone unit and I personally have not tested the TOSLINK in yet. 

post #6 of 16
Thread Starter 

firev1, could you use the toslink input and tell me how it works? A unit like this one could be very useful to me.

post #7 of 16

Sorry, unable to test the Toslink IN with the X-fi as a standalone unit, the loop test worked though. 

post #8 of 16
Thread Starter 

Loop test meaning?

post #9 of 16

Yes been looking for threads on this Sound-Blaster X-FI as well. Curious here.
And a little off-topic, is that amp any good for headphones by itself? Connecting to my pc and is considering getting this...

post #10 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by potatoos View Post

Loop test meaning?


Toslink out to Toslink in worked ( RMAA on pc) 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soul363 View Post

Yes been looking for threads on this Sound-Blaster X-FI as well. Curious here.
And a little off-topic, is that amp any good for headphones by itself? Connecting to my pc and is considering getting this...


Amp section is good for most of the lower impedance headphones, I don't think it has the power to drive the HD600 or 650 though but certainly works pretty well for my old M50s and my friend's Beyerdynamic DT770 80ohm, I do not have any high impedance phones to drive it with. The DAC section has respectable specs but you will have to do upsampling to 24/96 to get the best results out of it. For low impedance headphones it does not do well with most of the BA and I personally run my X-fi HD through the Objective 2 amp. 

 

post #11 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by firev1 View Post

Amp section is good for most of the lower impedance headphones, I don't think it has the power to drive the HD600 or 650 though but certainly works pretty well for my old M50s and my friend's Beyerdynamic DT770 80ohm, I do not have any high impedance phones to drive it with. The DAC section has respectable specs but you will have to do upsampling to 24/96 to get the best results out of it. For low impedance headphones it does not do well with most of the BA and I personally run my X-fi HD through the Objective 2 amp. 

 


 

Thanks! So 55 ohms should be no problem for the sound-blaster right? I'm sorry but i'm a newbie in this hobby, been lurking for ages but never understood some terms. What does the BA mean? And the upsampling part, i can do it through the one of foobar's component, the resampler right? Correct me if i'm wrong blink.gif

post #12 of 16
Thread Starter 

Do you have any other DAC's to which you can compare this DAC's abilities?

post #13 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soul363 View Post


 

Thanks! So 55 ohms should be no problem for the sound-blaster right? I'm sorry but i'm a newbie in this hobby, been lurking for ages but never understood some terms. What does the BA mean? And the upsampling part, i can do it through the one of foobar's component, the resampler right? Correct me if i'm wrong blink.gif

BA =Balanced Armature. Foobar has a resampler thats correct. 55 ohms should be no problem for the Sound-blaster.
 

 


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by potatoos View Post

Do you have any other DAC's to which you can compare this DAC's abilities?

Mainly the E10 and Emu labs 0204. The 0204 has less connectivity(I need the optical out) but has better measurements. The E10 has a very nice headphone amp, which would be my recommendation if you are not connecting anything else to it. Otherwise its the X-fi HD which best the E10 in almost everyway especially if you use it with a competent amp. 
 

 

post #14 of 16
Thread Starter 

The X-Fi really does better than the E10 as far as being used as a DAC? That is odd because I haven't read many people talking about it, while people rave about the E10.

post #15 of 16

That's because the E10 is heavily advertised here and recommended around, the X-fi HD is usually recommended around at Japanese forums. I do think the upcoming E17 will outperform the X-fi HD by a large margin though it will be a while before release. On top of that, the E10 is integrated with a pretty darn good amp component which IMO is good for the price. 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphone Amps (full-size)

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Sound Blaster X-Fi HD or Fiios E10