Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Computer Audio › Most appropriate EAC Lame command line for Lame 3.98.4?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Most appropriate EAC Lame command line for Lame 3.98.4?

post #1 of 4
1/1/12 at 12:08am
Thread Starter 

Alright, so this is really really nagging me, as I've tried looking around the Internet for the most appropriate EAC Command line for ripping into V0.

 

I found the following for 3.98.2:

 

-V 0 --add-id3v2 --pad-id3v2 --ta "%a" --tt "%t" --tg "%m" --tl "%g" --ty "%y" --tn "%n" %s %d

 

And I tried using it, but am not 100% if it's actually doing V0 or not. Is there a way to check? Is this the same for 3.98.4?

Reply
post #2 of 4
1/1/12 at 2:35am

I only have 3.98.2 at hand, but yes, -V 0 is VBR with maximum quality, and I do not think it is different in 3.98.4 since the option has been the same for a long time. For some additional quality improvement, you may also want to add -h or even -q 0 (-h is the same as -q 2, the default is -q 5).

 

Reply
post #3 of 4
1/1/12 at 6:47pm
Thread Starter 

Thanks for the tip. What does it do, though?

Reply
post #4 of 4
1/2/12 at 4:01am
Quote:
Originally Posted by wicked.ludicrous View Post

Thanks for the tip. What does it do, though?


According to the documentation, it improves the encoding quality at the expense of making it slower. I did not extensively compare if it actually makes much (if any) audible difference in practice, though. But even at the highest quality setting, it is much faster than real time, and you only have to wait for it once, so why not ? normal_smile%20.gif

 

Edit: I did a quick test and -q 0 took about 20-25% more time to encode than -q 5 (the default). But after decoding both MP3 files, the difference in the signal was not really much, either.

 


Edited by stv014 - 1/2/12 at 4:12am
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Computer Audio
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Computer Audio › Most appropriate EAC Lame command line for Lame 3.98.4?