Quote:
Originally Posted by
theodegoob1 
Also what is this "house" sound in the Stax you guys speak of?
I'm not exactly sure what it is myself, not without being able to audition more headphones.
Lambda-series models are bright and very open, airy, atmospheric-sounding as a rule. However, I did find the SR-202 to not make vocals stand out quite like the vintage Normal bias SR-Lambda does (though my set's drivers are rebuilt, thus not perfectly representative of a stock SR-Lambda), as well as add a slight roughness to everything...but there's just as much of a possibility that the amplifier differences could be to blame for that. (SR-Lambda is driven by a SRD-7/SB fed by an old TX-SV515PRO receiver, while the SR-202 is driven by a SRM-212.) On the flip side, maybe it is the headphone drivers, given how the SR-Lambda Pro allegedly has more bass but a recessed midrange compared to the Normal bias version.
(Do note that I don't consider the SR-202 bad or anything...it's more of a comparison between "good" and "great".)
Those who have heard the SR-007 say that it's rather dark-sounding by comparison, and it's even mentioned in a basshead thread. (Electrostatics in a basshead thread, would you believe that?) It's also said to have slightly less soundstage width than the Lambda-series models, though possibly more precise in its imaging.
The new SR-009 is often touted as the most neutral headphone ever made, though that could be hype and placebo for all I know given the steep price tag. Soundstage is allegedly even bigger than the Lambda lineup, hard to believe as that sounds.
Even if it's only Stax-made electrostatics we're talking about here (not even bringing up the Koss ESP/950, Sennheiser Orpheus, or so forth), there's still some differentiation to the sound between different models.