I'm trying to justify buying a DAC to replace the headphone out socket on my MacBook. I'm listening through a pair of Grado SR80i's, all of my music is lossless (at at least 16/44.1) and most of it should have been well recorded.
I've really got two questions:
(i) Will I notice any difference in sound quality over the on-board Intel HD audio, especially given that the Grado's are of relatively low impedance and so should be quite happy being driven from the headphone out socket?
(ii) is DAC burn-in a real phenomenon? The reason that I ask is because of the following:
I've been reading a lot of reviews and frequently a reviewer starts out negatively, describing a DAC as flat and lifeless and then after some magic burn-in time, the DAC suddenly improves and sounds much better. I remain skeptical of burn-in for solid state devices and consequentially, I'm far more likely to take the reviewer's initial thoughts and doubt his final conclusion.
I'm happy to accept the need to let the unit warm up as I know that the electronic properties of components like capacitors can be quite temperature dependent, but is burn-in a real phenomenon? It doesn't seem very reasonable to expect that anything much should change over over a few hours or days of running. There shouldn't really be any mechanical changes (although I accept the extreme case of electrolytics leaking after years and years of use) and I wouldn't expect there to be any slow chemical changes occurring (again, electrolytics come to mind). Isn't this more likely to be a psychological effect, whereby you just get used to what you're listening to?
I'm not trying to open an old can of worms, but I really want to know if this is real: if there are any burn-in believers, can they propose some mechanism by which the DAC changes after this time? Moreover, why does the DAC *always* sound better? Shouldn't there be at least some cases where it ends up sounding worse?
Thanks!
Edited by hugothedog - 12/26/11 at 5:42pm
















