or Connect
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › The discovery thread.! New NiceHCK DZ7 1DD+6 BA iem impression by ericp10. Page 2153
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The discovery thread.! New NiceHCK DZ7 1DD+6 BA iem impression by ericp10. Page 2153 - Page 240

post #3586 of 32903
Quote:
Originally Posted by mochill View Post

The mids are great and highs also smily_headphones1.gif




They are ok for what they are man, but nothing to hype about you know. cool.gif

post #3587 of 32903

lol this thread is indicative of a lot of things good and bad about head-fi.rolleyes.gif

post #3588 of 32903
Quote:
Originally Posted by mochill View Post

Try out the jvc gumy plus this thing has amazing bass and other frequency......on sell at sears for 7.99$ .........10-20k with 103db sensetivity, so alittle bit louder then fx101 smily_headphones1.gif, same response as fx101 but 2 db louder tongue.gif
are these really comparable to the fx101 or are you just overhyping them ? smily_headphones1.gif
post #3589 of 32903
Quote:
Originally Posted by stozzer123 View Post

lol this thread is indicative of a lot of things good and bad about head-fi.rolleyes.gif

Care to elaborate??? normal_smile%20.gif

 

oh read that one thread on the earpods, ahahaha had a good laugh.  You got your pods in yet rick? Some are REALLY hyping these pods to an outrageous level WoW.  Saying it's better than most of HP's/ IEMs under $100, some even over.  eek.gif rolleyes.gif

 

And I though we hype things here ahahahaha.


Edited by sfwalcer - 10/3/12 at 6:02pm
post #3590 of 32903

Just that theres some great info in it but a lot that i consider utter nonsense lol having been around these parts since 2004 it becomes cyclical lol

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by sfwalcer View Post

Care to elaborate??? normal_smile%20.gif

 

post #3591 of 32903
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfwalcer View Post

Care to elaborate??? normal_smile%20.gif

oh read that one thread on the earpods, ahahaha had a good laugh.  You got your pods in yet rick? Some are REALLY hyping these pods to an outrageous level WoW.  Saying it's better than most of HP's/ IEMs under $100, some even over.  eek.gifrolleyes.gif

And I though we hype things here ahahahaha.


Yea. I got them yesterday... You see me talking about them? Good, but come on man, any way. I am not going to judge no one for what they hear or their post counts... I think there is a ignore option on the board, yea. Some could find it usefull you know. Its there for a reason.

Anyway i would recomend those earbuds, no problem with them. Very good for 30 bucks, but no where near my cheapo jvc 500
Edited by rickdohc - 10/3/12 at 7:59pm
post #3592 of 32903
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickdohc View Post


Yea. I got them yesterday... You see me talking about them? Good, but come on man, any way. I am not going to judge no one for what they hear or their post counts... I think there is a ignore option on the board, yea. Some could find it usefull you know. Its there for a reason.
Anyway i would recomend those earbuds, no problem with them. Very good for 30 bucks, but no where near my cheapo jvc 500


So are they better then the FX40s? That's is the million dollar question. If they are WoW apple really did do something magical with their earbuds. I would think they are worth their $30 price tag but don't really punch up that much higher as compared to the FX40s. For me these FX40s sound like they should be $50 or above but not over $100 if I have to put a value on the sound.

 

 Are you trying to say that you're gonna put me on ignore for dissing apple products? No ricky no please don't do that to me.  triportsad.gif I have learned my lesson, I'll behave from now on, promise.  very_evil_smiley.gif

 

Nah I just want to know if they are as good as some people are saying and since you own lots of JVC's carbon nanotube gear, I trust you opinions on it. Unlike some of those people that are posting on that pod thread, who are obviously making pretty ridiculous claims. 


Edited by sfwalcer - 10/3/12 at 8:53pm
post #3593 of 32903

I've been listening to my pair for the past couple of weeks (earpods) and they aren't half bad.  It's got a huge soundstage and lots of boomy bass.  Mids and highs are actually good also.  They are worth the price but there's so many out there in the same price range that are just as good or better.  There's also many that are worse.  I wouldn't say the FX40's are better or worse, they sound different.  Only drawback for me with the earpods is that they don't sit in my ears properly.  When I'm walking around, they tend to pop out and I don't get that with any of my other earphones.  I'll probably just get rid of them just like I did with the FX40's.  Purchased them out of curiosity.  

post #3594 of 32903
Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyBai View Post

I've been listening to my pair for the past couple of weeks (earpods) and they aren't half bad.  It's got a huge soundstage and lots of boomy bass.  Mids and highs are actually good also.  They are worth the price but there's so many out there in the same price range that are just as good or better.  There's also many that are worse.  I wouldn't say the FX40's are better or worse, they sound different.  Only drawback for me with the earpods is that they don't sit in my ears properly.  When I'm walking around, they tend to pop out and I don't get that with any of my other earphones.  I'll probably just get rid of them just like I did with the FX40's.  Purchased them out of curiosity.  

Nice, excited to try a pair myself to see what the dealeo is with them. It's good to hear that they are on the lever of the FX40s, and since many people have said that they are more comfortable then traditional earbuds, this makes it even better. Earbuds always hurt my ears when I wear them, so looks like these earpods are gonna be a step up in both of these aspects.  beerchug.gif

post #3595 of 32903
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfwalcer View Post

Nice, excited to try a pair myself to see what the dealeo is with them. It's good to hear that they are on the lever of the FX40s, and since many people have said that they are more comfortable then traditional earbuds, this makes it even better. Earbuds always hurt my ears when I wear them, so looks like these earpods are gonna be a step up in both of these aspects.  beerchug.gif

If your ears are like any of the people apple tested these on, then they should fit fine.  Unfortunately mine aren't.  They more comfortable than the previous buds and sound much, much better.  

post #3596 of 32903
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dsnuts View Post

@ lourdes. I recommend you watch what you write on the threads. You can get banned for such remarks..No one forced you to like anything here. It is your opinion that you didn't like them that is fine but your remark is uncalled for..Just some advice.

Can you???confused_face.gif

post #3597 of 32903
Just fyi, Philips SHE5105 is now only
$14 at Amazon. It's a better version of 3580 with slightly better sound (per dsnut), much better cable and an inline Mic control. His biggest complaint back when he wrote the review was the price, which at $50 was many times that of 3580 with similar sound quality. But now at $14 the value is hard to beat imo.

Sent from my HTC One XL using Tapatalk 2
post #3598 of 32903
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfwalcer View Post


So are they better then the FX40s? That's is the million dollar question. If they are WoW apple really did do something magical with their earbuds. I would think they are worth their $30 price tag but don't really punch up that much higher as compared to the FX40s. For me these FX40s sound like they should be $50 or above but not over $100 if I have to put a value on the sound.

 

 Are you trying to say that you're gonna put me on ignore for dissing apple products? No ricky no please don't do that to me.  triportsad.gif I have learned my lesson, I'll behave from now on, promise.  very_evil_smiley.gif

 

Nah I just want to know if they are as good as some people are saying and since you own lots of JVC's carbon nanotube gear, I trust you opinions on it. Unlike some of those people that are posting on that pod thread, who are obviously making pretty ridiculous claims. 

 

 

yep, they are good and best part is that they are "free".

Are they better than my favorite Chepos?  (3580 and Fx40), its verrry close.  The earbud wins cause all the apple controls they got, but the 3580 and Fx40 are cheaper, so they got the upperhand there.

 

Are they better than most of the iems and heaphones under 100?  man, thats like saying that the best iem under 100 is the 3580...  man, you got tu lunatic or a hardcore appleluver for such a statment,  and you those you will find, so not a surprise.

 

just for the record, i love apple products, i got a Shufle, Ipad and IP4s so no bias here, but these earbud being better than anything under 100? got be crazy,  under 40 and it gots stiff competition (Mx580 earbud comes to mind).  BUT DONT GET ME WRONG.. they are very good man, very good.  i would recommend them for people searching earbuds or iems under 40.


Edited by rickdohc - 10/4/12 at 6:36am
post #3599 of 32903
Gumy plus is burning in now gonna answer the fx101 vs gumy pluse question later after 50 hrs.....oh and by the way monoprice has 3 new cheap earphones im gonna buy them tongue.gif
post #3600 of 32903
To me the gumy plus already can handle better basswhile still sound great in the other regions smily_headphones1.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › The discovery thread.! New NiceHCK DZ7 1DD+6 BA iem impression by ericp10. Page 2153