I'm not following. Where's the error in my logic? Its phrased a little weird, I was groggy but I was stating that burn in is real. BurnIn is simply mechanical parts getting older.
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
Wasn't sure what to expect out of the box because of all the mixed reviews. By mixed you would see 9 that love and totally swear by Ultrasone but then there was always one troll hating on em and...
-
This is a review of a pair of free IEM's I recieved from DUNU as part of a give away contest they recently held here on Head-fi. When I recieved my package the first thing I notices was...
-
Best closed headphones I had heard - very flat response, almost no midrange distortion, very easy to drive (good for portable), good soundstage (definately better than K240), good isolation, but...
-
Overall excellent buds, very good sound quality, especially for their price, the medium set of tips fits exactly in my ears and provides a near perfect seal. Bass is very detailed, but not...
-
I'll keep this very short. They are very smooth sounding. Treble toned down so not so good for rock but have a magic about them that makes them better than mark 2. I use them with a '89/'90...
Head-Fi Sponsors
Burn-in. Real or not? - Page 2
- Totally Dubbed
- Trader Feedback: +30
- aka 1337 Gamer
-
- offline
- 4,499 Posts. Joined 2/2010
- Location: Paris, France
- Select All Posts By This User
After people get experience with earphones, then people understand burn-in ;)
Take a look at the IE8's and ask any owner if they have or haven't improved since they first got them out the box.
Guarantee you over 95% will say they improved.
- swbf2cheater
- Trader Feedback: +56
-
- online
- 5,051 Posts. Joined 8/2009
- Location: 29 Spooner Street, Quahog, Rhode Island.
- Select All Posts By This User
I was agreeing with you :P Electronics wear and change over time, become more or less efficient in the transfer of electricity, but there are still some who disbelieve the existence of burn in. That is the same as someone telling me 1+1 does not equal 2 <3
- nipit
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 568 Posts. Joined 9/2011
- Location: Lithuania, Klaipeda
- Select All Posts By This User
Well...burn in won't cause any damage to your earphones, right? So why don't try? :)
- pancakeplease
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 87 Posts. Joined 11/2011
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Select All Posts By This User
Ah haha sorry for the confusion. Yep in agreement here :)
- navmau
- Trader Feedback: +13
-
- offline
- 790 Posts. Joined 7/2007
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Select All Posts By This User
Burn-in does exist, definitely.
- Many dynamic driver manufacturers actually recommend x hours of burn in to get the driver to the driver freely moving and perform to manufacturer specifications. I have had communications with manufacturers on this matter and they tell me that as the manufacturer, they recommend burn in.
- My personal experience backs this up. Each time I get a dynamic driver IEM, the changes are very notable over the first 25 hours, after that, it's more subtle. This makes sense as the majority of loosening of the driver would happen in around 20 hours, after that it would continue to loosen up and that is where the subtle change comes into it.
- It's not psychological because I have tested this too. e.g. if I am listening to a new DD IEM and the bass is bloated and really big and not defined and I suddenly change to an armature IEM, the "psychological" aspect should carry over and the armature IEM should have more bass, i.e. my brain would carry over the perception of the bloated DD to the armature IEM. This has never been the case, the armature sounds exactly the same as it always has.

I'll go against the grain and say I don't believe in burn-in. Don't shoot me ... you can believe what you like, but I'll keep believing what I do until something significant changes my opinion.
If research, with proper blind tests, ever shows a statiscally signficant proporation of listeners can tell the difference between new or "burnt in" earphones I'll happily change my stance but no individual personal testimony will change my opinion.
One thing that intrigues me though is that I've never known anyone mention that their earphones have started to "burn out" ... it appears that "burn in" only goes in one direction.
I'm not going to shoot you, don't worry.
I do however want to make a few statements about your post, the first one deals with the "one individual testimony"... What if 20 people told you that they have heard the effects of burn in, and they all followed the same pattern? How about 30? 40? 50? You've probably heard over 50 people on these forums alone that have stated and plotted out burn in. They all did it on an individual basis, but it's still 50 people. It may not be all at once, but it still is 50+ people. Just keep that one in mind... Now if you go outside these forums... Yeah...
As for the burn out statements. It's true, we don't ever hear about headphones burning out. Why don't they burn out? Well here's the short explanation. First, we have to assume that the following statement is true: "objects with more moving parts will be quicker to break". Although we can't prove this empirically, we can prove this through observations made daily. A HHD will break before an SSD ever will, simply because it has moving parts. Now, lets look at a car, more importantly, it's transmission. A cars transmission has lots of moving parts. And a cars transmission can take quite a while to burn out. Actually, my '93 Dodge Caravan's transmission lasted almost 18 years before the tranny dropped. Now a headphone is on a much smaller scale with less moving parts. On top of that, we don't push it as much, and it normally isn't used as extensively, or with as much stress, as a transmission will. So if a transmission can last 18 years, the headphones should be able to theoretically last just as long, if not longer.
There is a reason why we don't read about headphone burn out, we are more likely to damage other parts of the headphones, or even replace it before they burn it out.
I more believe in brain burn in rather than physical burn in
- swbf2cheater
- Trader Feedback: +56
-
- online
- 5,051 Posts. Joined 8/2009
- Location: 29 Spooner Street, Quahog, Rhode Island.
- Select All Posts By This User
^ its both
I'm curious as to the source of the term "burn in" since it seems like a bit of a misnomer to me. Isn't what's being described really a break in period?
I buy into it even though I've never really noticed it but my earphones are limited to relatively low end things compared to most here. If my SE215s have broken in then I didn't notice. But haven't there been measured tests of full size speakers showing a discernable change after a certain period of time? If speakers can change their signature then earphones could too. The basic technology of the dynamic driver is similar.
- fubar3
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 206 Posts. Joined 7/2011
- Location: Toronto
- Select All Posts By This User
I think it is a marketing trick. You are not entirely satisfied with the product. The vendor knows that any delay will make a return from you less likely.
Why would anyone buy a product that is not ready for use out-of-the-box? Best to buy headphones with free moving drivers.

I think it is a marketing trick. You are not entirely satisfied with the product. The vendor knows that any delay will make a return from you less likely.
Why would anyone buy a product that is not ready for use out-of-the-box? Best to buy headphones with free moving drivers.
Just like cars break in, drivers need to too. Why do you buy a product that's not ready for use out-of-the-box? So you know it's new and never been used. Would you buy a "new" car if it had 30k miles on it from "break in" so it'd be ready to go out of the dealer... I sure wouldn't. Same thing applies to headphones. It's part of the agreement that you are buying a new product, not a broken in product. It definitely isn't a marketing trick.
Your theory doubts one thing, frequency graphs that have been shown break in... I already may my comments on doubt... Does your brain burn in? Most likely, how long does it take? That's different for everyone (depends on sensitivity and time it takes to acoustically decay to the new sound)... That doesn't explain why I can say over the first 10 hours, the bass really settled down (when I listened to them for a total of 1 hour...) when another can say yes, 10 hours bass goes down (he on the other hand listened to 5 of those hours)... Although listening time does differ, the thing that remains the same is the 10 hours for bass to settle down.
Is there psychological burn in, I'm not going to doubt it... I'm am going to say that if it was only psychological, all headphones would take the same amount of time to "burn in" (since it would be dependant on a person's decay period to the new sound). However, we see that everyone has the same time frames for certain things to happen (same decay period? No way, everyone's ears and brains are different), on top of that, each headphone takes a different amount of time to burn in.
Imho, both mechanical parts and electronics (including wires and connectors) require burn in process.
I do not agree that an equipment that sounds awful before burn-in will sound good after burn-in.
Mechanically, dynamic drivers require longer burn-in time than BA.
I think 'break in' a new car is a little different. A car has a lot of physical contact (frictional wear due to abrasion). It needs time to settle down.
- randomkid
- Trader Feedback: +8
-
- offline
- 1,049 Posts. Joined 2/2011
- Location: Portugal
- Select All Posts By This User
- Burn-in. Real or not?
Recent Discussions
- › Android Music Players! 1 minute ago
- › Music Game IX 1 minute ago
- › What Are You Listening To Right Now? -New thread, new rules.... 5 minutes ago
- › Songs that make your headphone WOOOOOW!!! 8 minutes ago
- › The diary entries of a little girl nearing 30! 8 minutes ago
- › Sennheiser HD 700: Officially Unveiled at CES 2012! 10 minutes ago
- › Which headphones are an upgrade from the Sennheiser HD600? 11 minutes ago
- › Yulong D100 DAC (version 1) and Cavalli Audio CTH Rev A combo 13 minutes ago
- › Denon Officially Announces Its New Headphones! 15 minutes ago
- › aiaiai tma-1 studio MIA? 16 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Ultrasone HFI-780 S-Logic Surround Sound Professional Headphones by DemonFox
- › Dunu DN-18 Hawkeye by dweaver
- › AKG K 270 Studio by AmarokCZ
- › Sennheiser CX 870 ear canal phones by AndrewHume1
- › AKG K141 (Silver) by Captain Magenta
- › Skullcandy 50/50 - Headset ( in-ear ear-bud ) - white, chrome by shimrra
- › Sennheiser HD 449 Headphones Black by kstuart
- › Aiaiai TMA-1 by DE Nefta
- › Shure SRH1840 Professional Open Back Headphones (Black) by kstuart
- › TEAC PD-H600 Reference 600 Series CD Player by gonkulator
New Articles
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
- › Sennheiser Hd4 8 Modding For Newbies by koolkat
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map





