I haven't gained weight in the past 4-5 years.
I haven't gained weight in the past 4-5 years.

Review was pretty informative. Alu shells are indeed very tough. My old Denon C751 and 551 didn't even blink at being run over by a car. A heavy footed family member would do nothing to them. That said the RHA design isn't as robust looking. Might pick one up, they're pretty cheap.
I hate video editing.
Yeah, that is what I was worried about. I am not about to do a test on them obviously.
I am fine with it.
Same
I fluctuate between 72 and 78kg, which I guess is fairly heavy for 5' 9". Mostly due to how much free time I have to eat.
I'm pretty consistently under-weight myself.
Most of my video editing is from rendered animation, so I like getting it right in the render. Fixing it in post is just sloppy. Colour effects and stuff...sure that's ok.
It's ok :D well... you can't be over/underweight until you're finished growing
I'm around the 73-75ish now that I haven't exorcised. Been that way for months
Quote:
Anorexic panda. Doesn't add up. You're supposed to be fat!

Soo...you can undress lolis? 

I noticed a trend.
Good IEM reviews are all done without telling the audience what you compare it to and what your test equipment is. At that level, you imply that you are at a point where you can just do the review and tell them to listen. It has worked well on many reviews.
There is a barrier point that most IEM's have. The MA-350's have a stopage at that high freq barrier as it tries to pass but can't. The actual problem is with a point below that one where the highs flucuate a bit. This creates a bit of a spike and fatigue.
I can see that you're passionate about reviewing gear, but I think you should take the time to critique your own review.
What would you rate your review, on a scale of one to ten?
Oh that's what you meant. I like regular easy editing. Cuts, effects, renderings, etc etc. I hate the fancy stuff.
but im not -------
On an Imperial Scale
Where 5 is the average grade I would give to a mass majority of 'regular' reviews from well known consumer sites.
I would say a 6.5 to 7. Depends.
Okay, that's great!
Now ask yourself, "how could I make this a 10?", or, "what would a 10 look like?".
I've mentioned it a few times in the past, but are you familiar with darth nut's review of the O2?
I am fully aware of my English. Sadly. I skipped honors level English classes because I hated writing.
I was good at critiquing other papers and other stuff. Hilariously enough, I sucked at writing my own but was good at doing what teahers do.
I do not know that one
Just scrolled through it
I don't think I will ever reach that point. I'm more of an enlightened consumer fi review type person.
I don't have a problem with your English. I can tell it's not perfect but if the information is passed on clearly, I don't care unless your grammar and spelling is actually atrocious. I've read enough fanfic to wish I had time to beta their writing(or slap their current beta reader around the face for not doing a good job).
I also dislike the head-fi reliance on html. Screws with Chrome autocorrect and the built-in autocorrect is total schiit.

I don't have a problem with your English. I can tell it's not perfect but if the information is passed on clearly, I don't care unless your grammar and spelling is actually atrocious. I've read enough fanfic to wish I had time to beta their writing(or slap their current beta reader around the face for not doing a good job).
I also dislike the head-fi reliance on html. Screws with Chrome autocorrect and the built-in autocorrect is total schiit.
ctrl+right click fixes everything
Thanks
Don't worry, I'm sure your writing skills will improve with time. Keep reading, and more importantly, keep writing!
This is compulsory reading for any reviewer-to-be; I highly suggest reading it carefully, not just skimming through it.
http://www.head-fi.org/t/40313/stax-sr-007-omega-ii-a-review-after-4-years-of-ownership
If you can capture the ethos of this review, in your own reviews, I think you'll do great.