Quote:
Originally Posted by
cifani090 
I never knew you could be an audiophile with $200 headphones. Interesting...
i saw your after post. but still. I don't think that just because you have sub $300 headphones and equipment that you shouldn't be one. The prices of audiophile equipment has severly changed this decade. the high quality things are getting more expensive AND the prices of good price to performance cans are also comming and bleeding out into the affordable range.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MrxSelfDestruct The beyers look like theyre right up my alley, but all I can find to buy are the Beyer DT770's 250ohm, are those any good?
...... didn't you say you didn't like rap. the DT770's are/have messy muddy bass. they are bassy cans. MalVeaux is a guy i see on forums a lot and have helped me in picking out my cans. but i would recommend the Ultrasone HFI 780's. they offer good highs and mids and lows...like really good ones. i have th ehfi 580's. it's a misconcpetion among newbies that the higher the line the better it is in everything . not so. for the majority of the time with audiophile headphones. some will actually get the lower seried one bc it does something that they like better. the hfi 580 is/has better bass while the hfi 780 is more for less bassy music(still has tight punchy bass) but less so and more emphasis on highs and mids form what i hear. the hfi lines are pretty good. if you want to know about leaking and comfortability. you can search up reviews. my review of the hfi 580 (in my signature) should give you a good sense of how comfortable they are. you can look at the sound quality seciton, but i haven't updated them with 100 hour burn in yet :)
i don't know about the pro 650 ultrasones. but since malveaux is suggesting them. im guessing they are more prone for rock. The Shure SRH 840's also look like good choices. however, i don't know if they will do rock well. my 440's even though are lesser ranked have been reviewed to have a more neutral sound, with some saying rock plays better on it. and from my experience.. rock isn't that good on it. i have it fully burned in already (600+ hours) and the rock still sounds not that good. it's harsh, and annoying to listen to. to all rock? no. but to enough that you kinda just turn the volume down a bit sometimes. the srh 840's have more bass pressense for electronic so that should be good. but from my exp with the hfi 580's...the hfi 580's are total monsters with electronic. listening to Pendulum ........was THE experience of a lifetime with the hfi 580s(after 50 hours of burn in) i can't wait to hear them at 600+hours(which some say is the amount you need to fully burn these in) d
despite what some say. yes. all the ones suggested don't need an amp. but as a rocker myself.... ipods don't deliver enough. it gives just enough. but ..........it can't.. i fear deliver a full experience :'( you will need to invest $20USD (or whatever in canada) for an E6. is it required? no. recommended? yes. I have 2 songs in my 600 song alac library that require an amp. not bc of not enough power, but bc of clipping. it happens to rock heads that like to jam out a lot. but other than that. yeah i say the:
Shure SRH 840/940
Ultrasone HFI 580/780 Pro 650?
....and that's really all i can recommend from my knowledge
