Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › [Review] CK100PRO Unboxing & Impressions (+ a retrospective journey with Audio-technica and versus CK100)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Review] CK100PRO Unboxing & Impressions (+ a retrospective journey with Audio-technica and... - Page 4

post #46 of 90
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omnirai View Post

CK100pro has a slight hiss with the E11. I don't find it "very high", it's only slightly audible when there's no music/during very very quiet segments. There's no audible hiss straight out of an ipod. I no longer find my pair's treble harsh - maybe it's burn-in, maybe it's acclimatization, who knows. It's still treble-centric, but it's fine with about 90% of my tracks. They are indeed very punishing of low-quality tracks though, due to how revealing they are. What I can tell you is the CK100pro are EXTREMELY source and tip-dependent, especially the treble response. A source mismatch (I hear the Cowons match terribly while the Sony Z series fare better) or poor-fitting tips can lead to very unpleasant and shrill sound, but if you find the right combination for your ears the CK100pro are right up there with the best of the best.

^What he said. And I thought I will share the following information below, with fellow members such as Omnirai and nhat_thanh who have commented before that they have experienced some rather harsh brightness/sibilance issues in terms of the treble with their own pair of CK100pro's. I hope the following will be useful to you guys, because currently from my portable source setup which is the Walkman NW-Z1070, I don't have any kind of treble harshness issues with my own pair. Please kindly note the below information has been posted before in one of my local forums, so I'm just cross-posting over so I'm sorry if alot of things doesn't seem to be spoken correctly in terms of first-person perspective.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Haonan 
No harsh highs experienced on my pair here, although in live CD recordings I would still perceive some slight sibilance while hitting high notes, mainly frm some of my older CDs featuring female vocalists. (afaik you can't avoid sibilance with certain CD recordings, it's all originally recorded into there especially live performances)

Although I do understand how the dynamics of a song track tends to scale when played at higher volumes, I have nv needed to listen at high vols with my CK100pros, the 100pros as I had mentioned in my initial review seems to be driven easier than the ex-flagship CK100, despite having higher impedance specs officially. (39ohm vs 23ohm on the CK100)

On my current Sony Walkman Z, I usually only listen it at only 11-steps vol in a quiet environment, and 13-steps vol while on noisy trains/outside environment. Even on my iPod Touch 4th Gen, I don't usually go past half of the volume slider, despite tat iPhone 4/4S generally have slightly more output power than my iTouch 4G from my own personal experience.

I do wish to share what a chinese discussion over at Mobile01 (taiwanese forum) have previously shared abt the CK100pros though, since I do lurk there occassionally.

According to one poster shaolin131 (post #6) who commented on CK100pro's harshness characteristics for its treble quality, he forwarded/translated the following info from a japanese blog review as seen here originally.

(Ranking in terms of treble harshness factor, from most harsh to no sibilance)
iBasso D2+ Hj Boa > Qables iQube > iPod touch > NW-Z1050 > Luxman DA-200

Below are some additional notes from shaolin131 (from post #31 onwards), seems to be from his own listening exp.
  • iPhone 4 (connected via headphone out): no noise hiss experienced, but treble sound is thin with harshness/sibilance experienced.
  • NW-A728 (connected via headphone out): acceptable to slight irritable noise hiss levels under no playback silence, no harshness/sibilance experienced in treble.


The conclusion? From my own iPod Touch 4G experience prev and what shaolin131 has shared over at the Mobile01 thread, it seemed that most Apple iDevices seems to have a slight peakiness/harshness character in the treble SQ quality when paired with CK100pros. However most Sony DAPs do not have this sibilance problem at all, or at least the report from this japanese blog review seems to reflect/coincide exactly with what I'm currently experiencing out of my current DAP which is a NW-Z1070, just that the one mentioned in the above japanese review is the 16GB variant model instead. (Z1070 = 64GB model, if you haven't been following Bloodaddict's Walkman Z thread closely)

I can't exactly tell ya whether Sony DAPs are warm by nature or not, since I only had their NW-HD5/Z1070 so far in terms for their digital Walkmans, the rest of my own collection are just their older cassette/CDP Walkmans. However I did had some hands-on experience with the older A820 series as well as their X1000 series, and those overall has a warmer tonality and sounds darker in its upper-mids/treble similar as my NW-HD5, while the current NW-Z1000 series is overall a more neutral, transparent and analytical DAP in short

Edited by Haonan - 8/2/12 at 3:15am
post #47 of 90
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatNzGuy View Post

Interesting, are the connectors on the cables the same as those UFL connectors you find on wifi cards in laptops? Those things transmit and receive 100mbps data bandwidths.
Null audio selling cable replacements for S$149 a set D: 

I'm definitely liking the sound of these, a bit heavy on the pocket though :/

Hi ThatNzGuy, no those are actually MMCX pin-connectors, just like the ones found on many current Shure IEMs. Except that the pin is reversed so you can't use those cheap Fiio-made replacements on the Audio-technicas at all. So far the only quality third-party replacement cable I know is only being made by Null Audio, for their Lune MK-II cables. I'm not really into or a believer of high-ends cables stuff so I did not purchase that since my default ones are still working fine at the moment and I like the build quality of the default cables, but at least now we know we have an alternative choice other than default original cables sold by Audio-technica (they charge 10,500yen for cable replacements in Japan).
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohannLiebert View Post

Thanks for the comparison.
So you are saying that listening to mainstream-music with mediocre production quality sucks with the ck100pro?
I read about this in-ear being picky with sources. What about a sony z1050 with a fiio e11. could anyone guess?

last but not least, nhat_thanh, where did you get the ck100pro? couldnt find any online shops in the eu

Hi JohannLiebert, you can order this from either Bluetin or AccessoryJackif you are residing in EU and you cannot find a reliable place to buy these. The above-mentioned sites are definitely reliable as far as customer services goes (I have not tried them before as I have my own japanese contact in JP so I bought my pair from Fujiya-Avic previously) as there are already plenty of feedback about these online stores on Head-fi or anywhere else. Although for best cost-savings IMO if you are able to deal with japanese words and don't mind relying on a forwarding proxy middlemen, I will highly recommend you to go sign up for an account on Amazon.co.jp website and use Tenso's forwarding services to ship to your home country.

Hope the above helps. redface.gif
post #48 of 90

I find that while the stock CK100pro cables are indeed very good, pairing it with the Lune MKII cable does help to reduce the brightness/sibilance level, and at the same time bringing out the mids and bass better.

 

Also to re-confirm what peacewalker mentioned, the correct Comply tips size are the T-500/TX-500, so TS may want to update your original post to avoid confusion.

post #49 of 90
I have received my ck100pro almost 2 weeks already. It sounds excellent and brings all the details from a song. I haven't experience any harshness treble so far with my rig. The lows are tight without overwhelming bass. The highs and mids is just the right amount that I prefer, although for some types of vocals it is not as good as ck100 presents. Over all, I am satisfied smily_headphones1.gif
post #50 of 90
Thank you very-very-very much for this great review. Bought CK100PRO: they sounds superb for me.
post #51 of 90

Which is better CKM1000 or CK100pro? I have a 250 gift card and I like to spend it on one of those. I can get a good deal on both I am just unfamiliar with Audio Technica IEM sound. I own ES10 which I enjoy greatly, that is all the experience I have with AT.

 

PS:My friend advice me to pick ckm-99 over ckm1000 as the SQ improvement are "very little"

post #52 of 90
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by audionewbi View Post

Which is better CKM1000 or CK100pro? I have a 250 gift card and I like to spend it on one of those. I can get a good deal on both I am just unfamiliar with Audio Technica IEM sound. I own ES10 which I enjoy greatly, that is all the experience I have with AT.

PS:My friend advice me to pick ckm-99 over ckm1000 as the SQ improvement are "very little"

I don't have any sort of chance to hear the CKM1000's for myself over here, but in terms of overall quality I heard the CKW1000's were not that far off from the CKM1000's just that the CKW1000ANV's were more delicate/tamed in terms of the mids/upper-mids response. You should go for the CK100PRO's if you have that gift card to use for discounts, so far among all the top-tier universal that I have tried so far which includes those being mentioned and quite popularly known ard such as Westone W4R/Ultimate Ears UE900/Sony XBA-4, I actually preferred the CK100PRO plainly over those models, it's the more refined one for me personally and there are alot of people in my own country who have tried the 100PRO's and have never been disappointed by their sound qualities as well. (as I did created a dedicated thread in one of my local forums as well, apart from the one I posted on Head-fi)
post #53 of 90

My right driver died, good game.

post #54 of 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haonan View Post


I don't have any sort of chance to hear the CKM1000's for myself over here, but in terms of overall quality I heard the CKW1000's were not that far off from the CKM1000's just that the CKW1000ANV's were more delicate/tamed in terms of the mids/upper-mids response. You should go for the CK100PRO's if you have that gift card to use for discounts, so far among all the top-tier universal that I have tried so far which includes those being mentioned and quite popularly known ard such as Westone W4R/Ultimate Ears UE900/Sony XBA-4, I actually preferred the CK100PRO plainly over those models, it's the more refined one for me personally and there are alot of people in my own country who have tried the 100PRO's and have never been disappointed by their sound qualities as well. (as I did created a dedicated thread in one of my local forums as well, apart from the one I posted on Head-fi)

Thanks for the reply back. I bought the CK100pro. Correct me if I am wrong it is the only multi BA IEM out there which sounds kick ass right out of ipod ! It is great. It is sound charactersitic is very similar to ER4S which is a plus for me, however it actually has great bass and excellent mid range. 

There is a hint of sibilance but it is nothing to worry about. I am planning to buy the CKM 1000 ANV but right now I am saving for fitearGo111. But considering fitearGO111 is just an efficent ER4S I mightjust get the CKM1000 ANV.

post #55 of 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bokyung View Post

My right driver died, good game.

Which one the CK100pro or the CKM1000? Sorry to hear that.

post #56 of 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by audionewbi View Post

Which one the CK100pro or the CKM1000? Sorry to hear that.

CK100Pro.

post #57 of 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bokyung View Post

CK100Pro.

Check if it is the cable or not. To do this basically reverse the cable connection and see if that fixes.If it is the cable than you should get the sound on the right and no sound on left. 

post #58 of 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by audionewbi View Post

Check if it is the cable or not. To do this basically reverse the cable connection and see if that fixes.If it is the cable than you should get the sound on the right and no sound on left. 

It's the drivers, that was the first thing I tried haha.

post #59 of 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bokyung View Post

It's the drivers, that was the first thing I tried haha.

wow, that doesnt sound good for a product that is price for 799 USD! Hope that doesnt happen to mine, darn it!

post #60 of 90

The Ck100pro sounds like it sucks with low output impedance devices(cowon,i-products).

Sony are high ohm which isnt recommended for Multi-BA Inears. Yet people seem to like them more with the sony.... That's bad.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › [Review] CK100PRO Unboxing & Impressions (+ a retrospective journey with Audio-technica and versus CK100)