Originally Posted by preproman
You wouldn't say they're warmer than what? Other AKGs? Yeah right.... Picture that..
That's really funny.
IMO there's no way in the world the 65th anniversaries would be called bright.
Every last person that owns a pair seems to think or would call them a warm headphone. Including me. It's all good though. I guess you like listening to your music closed up in a closet **cough LCD-2 cough**. Have at it buddy. I'll continue to enjoy the warm sound of the 65th anniversaries.
I'm sure you know, but just in case you don't. 5% is all it takes. What??
Warmer than the previous craptastic line of original Q/K70X, again I wouldn't call it warmer, though I'd love a FR graph to see where people are saying this warmer treble/sig is based from/on, at least me and 3 other people have heard and owned them wouldn't say they are warm. Would I say it is slightly more tolerable to listen than the previous Q/K70X mess, possibly yes.
And sorry no I don't like listening to my music in a closet, I like my music open, wide, spacious and realistic or natural for most listening sessions, unfortunately for my LCD2's and those rev.2's I've heard, they sound so inferior and boring to my Stax gear and my HD800's. Only reason I'm keeping my rev.1's is just for the sake of the wooden housing, all else is soundwise is a joke and I expect it to be even more of a joke when I get my BHSE in.
Edited by DefQon - 3/28/13 at 6:54pm