AKG - Quincy Jones Signature Series Q701 vs. Grado 325i

Did you ever try the flat pads on the Grados?

I had all 3 pads for a pair of 325i and liked each for different genres. The flats allow more bass out of the 3.

I assume that you've never heard the 701 but like what you've read. Since you've already tasted Grado, I will recommend the AKG.Some love em', some hate em'.  I'm somewhere in the middle.

....and what, no love for Beyerdynamic?            

The M-Stage and the AKG are natural friends - and it would be a great complement to your Sennheisers. 

 3 x completely different headphones, you'd have to try really hard to find 3 more strange headphones in

 the one place :-)

 Depends what you want.

Quote:

Originally Posted by liamstrain 

The M-Stage and the AKG are natural friends - and it would be a great complement to your Sennheisers. 

Yes, a good surprise on the opposite side.

Quote:

Originally Posted by I3eyond 

Opposite in what sense? 

Well, If I'll tell ya you not going to be surprised.

Have both.  The Q might be a bit more neutral as in frequency response.  That's fine but it's not bumpy in the mid-bass which makes it less "fun".  The 325is are brighter up top, not too much for me, but with a much more pleasing mid-range.  The Q is a little plastiky in the mids, not quite real.  The Grados have that mid-bass hump which I don't mind at all. I've instantly switched back and forth and I'll take the Grados every time.  I really wanted to like the Q701 (I do) and as long as you don't do instant comparos, you'll be O.K..  Please spare me that the best headphones have to be "neutral".  It ain't so, but, YMMV.

If you do get Q701s, please don't pay $399 on that best buy link!    (hint: amazon)

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbophead 

Have both.  The Q might be a bit more neutral as in frequency response.  That's fine but it's not bumpy in the mid-bass which makes it less "fun".  The 325is are brighter up top, not too much for me, but with a much more pleasing mid-range.  The Q is a little plastiky in the mids, not quite real.  The Grados have that mid-bass hump which I don't mind at all. I've instantly switched back and forth and I'll take the Grados every time.  I really wanted to like the Q701 (I do) and as long as you don't do instant comparos, you'll be O.K..  Please spare me that the best headphones have to be "neutral".  It ain't so, but, YMMV.

What about the sub bass?

Quote:

Originally Posted by I3eyond 

Between the Grado and AKG sound, which is closer to the Martin Logan's with the folded tweeter design?

 

And, perhaps the biggest question:  Which between the AKGs and Grados is the most opposite from my HD650 in sound, and how?

The speaker comparison might be a stretch 

But as for your second question, easy, Grado

Grados are much more forward, lively across the upper mid range and treble, solid mid bass hump that kicks along kick drums, unforgiving

with poor material while the HD650 is benign and kind in that respect to your ears ~ driver speed ~ there is a sensation that Grado drivers

feel very fast indeed, this has been proven on some of Purrin's graphs which shows very fast note attack and decay rates of an RS1 versus

a HD650 and Denon D2000. HD650 came second, D2000 lagged behind, RS1 was quickest to draw.

Soundstage is very deep but not very wide, detail is equal if not superior in my opinion to the HD650 due to the inherent Grado bright signature.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acix 

What about the sub bass?

Not a lot on either one.  So far, the two sub-bass phones I bought, D7000 and LCD-2 rev.1, had too many other problems.  Sub-bass (below 32Hz) is fun but it sure isn't everything.