Quote:
Originally Posted by
HaVoC-28 
HD-600 and DT-880 (600 ohm) Better than a K701/702 or Q701 ? Well for your hearing peraphs ^^ but many like me will not agree . All on par yeah , and choice will be made by personnal tastes .
Personnaly i am not foud of Sennheiser sound , Denon hum a Boomy bass can (not at all my taste XD) .
DT-880 (600 ohms) just received it today (replaced a DT-880 Pro too much clamping for me) . DT-880 600 are great , but i will not say that they sound better than my K702 . In fact in my system they sound closer to my K702 than my DT-880 Pro sounded : a bigger soudstage , more depth ,a less congested sound , airier , more mediums , less proeminant highs , and less impact on bass (not very much more impact than my K702 ...) .
And Why not the HE-300 ?
Yes, HD600 over DT 880 (600) and both over K701 certainly is a personal preference, - has to do with the shape of auris externa s. auricula, etc.
As for bass, DT 880 (600) go deeper than K701 - not more impactful. HD600 are a bit more impactful, more fun, -- but not too much, just on the spot. D2000 were fun for a fortnight, but that indeed proved too much. I go back to D2000 once or twice a month, but they are not for me.
For me beyers are more comfortable, - which is individual preference again. K701 are on a par with HD600 - first too loose, second too tight.
I like all these cans to a certain extent, but I cannot justify keeping them, - I go back to k701 no more than once a month. And ultimately I dislike listening to headphones at home, esp. with an amp. I'd rather add Sennheiser HD 25-1 II, gradually sell off the open ones and finally MF V-can, and maybe get a T5P one day. Or just get a T5P.
I have not really considered Hifiman - moreover, I have decided to stick to as portabe and simple setups as possible, retaining as much SQ and comfort as I can, I do not think there is much in Hifiman's stable for me (apart from DAPs).
P.S.
I just typed "honk" instead of "think".
Freudian slip?
Freudian slip in one's third language??