I have heard people describe the Sennheiser 598 as relatively bright. I currently own the Sennheiser 280 HD Pros and just received the 598s. I felt like brighter headphones will allow the vocals to pop a little more and the treble to come out a little more as well, if that makes sense. However, I feel like with certain songs, the vocals pop more with the 280 HD Pros. That's not to say they sound better because they don't, but I thought there would be more vocal projection with the 598. Am I interpreting brightness wrong or is there something wrong with my 598s?
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
This is a review of a pair of free IEM's I recieved from DUNU as part of a give away contest they recently held here on Head-fi. When I recieved my package the first thing I notices was...
-
Best closed headphones I had heard - very flat response, almost no midrange distortion, very easy to drive (good for portable), good soundstage (definately better than K240), good isolation, but...
-
Overall excellent buds, very good sound quality, especially for their price, the medium set of tips fits exactly in my ears and provides a near perfect seal. Bass is very detailed, but not...
-
I'll keep this very short. They are very smooth sounding. Treble toned down so not so good for rock but have a magic about them that makes them better than mark 2. I use them with a '89/'90...
-
Bought these on whim, for your basic train ride to work I don't mind. But its far from being the best I have own.
Head-Fi Sponsors
Sennheiser 598 not very bright?
- bbophead
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 691 Posts. Joined 6/2010
- Location: South Central Texas
- Select All Posts By This User

I have heard people describe the Sennheiser 598 as relatively bright. I currently own the Sennheiser 280 HD Pros and just received the 598s. I felt like brighter headphones will allow the vocals to pop a little more and the treble to come out a little more as well, if that makes sense. However, I feel like with certain songs, the vocals pop more with the 280 HD Pros. That's not to say they sound better because they don't, but I thought there would be more vocal projection with the 598. Am I interpreting brightness wrong or is there something wrong with my 598s?
As a Grado lover/owner and also owner of 598's, I naturally feel that the Senns are less bright. Mostly I use them when, say, a remastered recording has been tweaked to be too brash or harsh sounding. They come in handy then. I would never call them bright, tho'.
Thanks for your reply! Also, sometimes I feel like male vocals are more recessed than female vocals. Is that because male vocals mesh more with instrumentals in the mids section, while female voices are more distinct in the highs?
- fabio-fi
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 1,779 Posts. Joined 6/2011
- Location: Italy
- Select All Posts By This User
Question, how many hours of burn-in your 598's have?
IMHO they have a Grado approach, relatively bright when you compare to other senn models.
- bbophead
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 691 Posts. Joined 6/2010
- Location: South Central Texas
- Select All Posts By This User
Perhaps male vocals do get down in the mix as compared to female. Hadn't thought about that. You may be on to something there. Also, don't know other Senns so I have no experience how the 598's compare with their brothers (sisters?). My 598's prolly have close to a hundred hours on them. It's a real pleasant headphone.
- chicolom
- Trader Feedback: +12
-
- online
- 1,214 Posts. Joined 5/2008
- Location: Southwest Ohio
- Select All Posts By This User
I have almost no hours of burn in. I just got them, so maybe 2-3 hours max. Does burn in help with brightness though? I thought they help primarily with bass presence, but I have been pleasantly surprised with the bass (which I had reservations about upon reading reviews). And compared to my Sennheiser 280s, I don't know if they're less bright, but they seem more warm, if that makes any sense. Maybe the 598s are far brighter in comparison to the Sennheiser 600/650s?
- fabio-fi
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 1,779 Posts. Joined 6/2011
- Location: Italy
- Select All Posts By This User

I have almost no hours of burn in. I just got them, so maybe 2-3 hours max. Does burn in help with brightness though? I thought they help primarily with bass presence, but I have been pleasantly surprised with the bass (which I had reservations about upon reading reviews). And compared to my Sennheiser 280s, I don't know if they're less bright, but they seem more warm, if that makes any sense. Maybe the 598s are far brighter in comparison to the Sennheiser 600/650s?
Out of the box i felt they were bright..after some hours i can notice some improvements on soundstage and bass. The 600/650, they are more dark sounding to my ears. But, if you get a decent amp for them it helps.
- wilzc
- Trader Feedback: +16
-
- offline
- 920 Posts. Joined 4/2011
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Select All Posts By This User
No, these are hardly bright at all.
I need a torchlight to listen to them right
- PurpleAngel
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 3,650 Posts. Joined 9/2011
- Location: California
- Select All Posts By This User

I have heard people describe the Sennheiser 598 as relatively bright. I currently own the Sennheiser 280 HD Pros and just received the 598s. I felt like brighter headphones will allow the vocals to pop a little more and the treble to come out a little more as well, if that makes sense. However, I feel like with certain songs, the vocals pop more with the 280 HD Pros. That's not to say they sound better because they don't, but I thought there would be more vocal projection with the 598. Am I interpreting brightness wrong or is there something wrong with my 598s?
What source(s) are you plugging the headphones into?
The HD-280s are 64-Ohm
The HD-598 are 50-Ohm
So the numbers say the 598 is easier to drive.
But I like to think a headphone amplifier brings out the best of any headphone.
Actually the HD 280 is 50 ohms, I do not know why they label them as 64 ohms. I've measured ~60 HD 280 and the impedance lies between 49-55 ohms.
IMO, the HD 598 have enough highs, not overly ear piercing, but not recessed. Compared to other Sennheiser's quantity(NOT quality) of highs, HD 580/600>HD 598>HD 595>HD 558>HD 555>HD650. I owned all of those headphones.
Basically Grado fans will call it recessed, Sennheiser fans will call it bright.
The HD598 is definitely on the brighter side of neutral, but it wasn't what really bothered me. The HD598 lacked a fullness in the midrange to truly sound convincing with vocals, but it's not something easily achieved in the HD598's price bracket. I was able to achieve a much more satisfying midrange by EQing down the treble and upper midrange with a linear phase EQ. I eventually upgraded to a Stax 007, but I'm also EQing the 007 in a similar fashion.
I recommend you to try experimenting with a linear phase EQ to find a good balance with the vocals. However, I would not recommend using minimal phase EQs. Those distort the soundstage, pushing certain vocals/instruments forward and back.
- PurpleAngel
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 3,650 Posts. Joined 9/2011
- Location: California
- Select All Posts By This User

Actually the HD 280 is 50 ohms, I do not know why they label them as 64 ohms. I've measured ~60 HD 280 and the impedance lies between 49-55 ohms.
IMO, the HD 598 have enough highs, not overly ear piercing, but not recessed. Compared to other Sennheiser's quantity(NOT quality) of highs, HD 580/600>HD 598>HD 595>HD 558>HD 555>HD650. I owned all of those headphones.
Basically Grado fans will call it recessed, Sennheiser fans will call it bright.
Got the 64-Ohm straight off Sennheiser USA website, but what do they know.
- PurpleAngel
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 3,650 Posts. Joined 9/2011
- Location: California
- Select All Posts By This User
Cool, my two cents are to give them 50 hours of play time, might improve the sound.
- Sennheiser 598 not very bright?
Recent Discussions
- › The Official Beyerdynamic T1 Owner's Club / Appreciation /... 28 seconds ago
- › What's my logical next step in headphones? 2 minutes ago
- › Please recommend fully balanced headphone amp/pre with multiple... 3 minutes ago
- › Copper vs silver cables 3 minutes ago
- › Headphones are IIR filters? [GRAPHS!] 3 minutes ago
- › AKG K550 modifications 6 minutes ago
- › Beethoven String Quartets 11 & 15, and "Die Moldau" 6 minutes ago
- › Benchmark DAC1 HDR Silver 6 minutes ago
- › Weiss DAC202 8 minutes ago
- › Big box fever strikes again 9 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Dunu DN-18 Hawkeye by dweaver
- › AKG K 270 Studio by AmarokCZ
- › Sennheiser CX 870 ear canal phones by AndrewHume1
- › AKG K141 (Silver) by Captain Magenta
- › Skullcandy 50/50 - Headset ( in-ear ear-bud ) - white, chrome by shimrra
- › Sennheiser HD 449 Headphones Black by kstuart
- › Aiaiai TMA-1 by DE Nefta
- › Ultrasone HFI-780 S-Logic Surround Sound Professional Headphones by 12Rounds
- › Shure SRH1840 Professional Open Back Headphones (Black) by kstuart
- › TEAC PD-H600 Reference 600 Series CD Player by gonkulator
New Articles
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
- › Sennheiser Hd4 8 Modding For Newbies by koolkat
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map






