Quote:
Needs moar Shakti Stone.
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
I was going to do the teleportation tweak, but it costs more per minute than Miss Cleo.
Now that Arthur C. Clarke has passed, Geoffkait is my go-to guy for great science fiction.

All I've said is that to date, no one has ever demonstrated actual audible differences between cables, save for instances where the measured differences were within currently known audible thresholds. That's just a simple statement of fact.
As for my cables, the primary target is myself. And my pursuit of audio is not a utilitarian, objective pursuit but rather a wholly subjective pursuit. All I care about at the end of the day is the subjective pleasure and enjoyment I get, regardless of what the reasons for it might be. And the cables I designed give me the greatest pleasure sonically, aesthetically and philosophically. Do they make an audible difference? I don't know. Nor do I really care. I'm only concerned with the subjective pleasure I get from them at the end of the day.
se
The funny thing in this is that as someone who doesn't believe in an audible difference in cable, I may still one day buy cables from Steve Eddy simple because his cables look and feel nice, and their maker doesn't try to b******t people with pseudo science.
It smells like the real thing.

How can you be both subjective and objective toward a particular product yet claim to be unaware of any subjective component ?



With that kind of doublespeak, you should run for office. Seriously.
I don't claim any subjective benefits because any such benefits are, by definition (DUH!), subjective.
Not everyone has the same subjective experience in response to a given thing. Nor does everyone have the same subjective tastes and preferences as everyone else. I can only relate to my own subjective experience. I can't possibly tell anyone else what their particular subjective experience will be. So what would be the point other than a cynical attempt to predispose people to have certain expectations?
Perhaps in order to discover what their particular subjective experience will be?
And I'm afraid that's just going to have to do, because I could never bring myself to be so arrogant as to try and tell someone what their subjective experience will be or should be. If one could do that, then it would no longer be subjective, would it?
se
What doublespeak is that? My pursuit of the enjoyment of audio and reproduced music is purely hedonistic and subjective. And to that end, I don't care whether or not something produces an actual audible difference. So I fail to see where you get the doublespeak from. Would you care to explain it?
se