Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Role of soundstage in sound quality?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Role of soundstage in sound quality?

post #1 of 17
Thread Starter 

Just curious, do you guy regard soundstage when judging sound quality, because I love a big sound and a big soundstage and they make a headphone a whole lot more enjoyable , but idk if that means the sound quality it better. For me the M50 sounds a lot better than the HD25 because of the soundstage and the big sound. Oh and I can make them louder because their is less sibilance. Anyways, if I were to exclude the soundstage the HD25 would sound better with its faster bass. I mean I don't use a proper amp so that probably affects the outcome, but still how would you guys consider soundstage as a factor in sound quality, I personally think it should play a lot more important role than it seems to among head-fiers. That and presentation of the sound. 

post #2 of 17

It definitely plays a big role.  However there's a lot of different personal definitions of what soundstage really is.  Some people categorize it by the raw depth of the sound, some categorize it as just the imaging, some categorize it as a mix of multiple things.  I kinda think it's hard to judge a soundstage in relevance to the way it's used with speakers, because the driver positions are on either ear, and there is no natural playback of the original imaging unless the recording as binaural.  That doesn't stop headphones from being more spacious sounding than others, though.

 

A good spacial sound will make things more clearer and defined.  Open headphones leak sound naturally so they usually have better soundstage.  M50s have really poor soundstage, and that makes them sound very cluttered and sloppy compared to a lot of other headphones.

post #3 of 17
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMRaven View Post

It definitely plays a big role.  However there's a lot of different personal definitions of what soundstage really is.  Some people categorize it by the raw depth of the sound, some categorize it as just the imaging, some categorize it as a mix of multiple things.  I kinda think it's hard to judge a soundstage in relevance to the way it's used with speakers, because the driver positions are on either ear, and there is no natural playback of the original imaging unless the recording as binaural.  That doesn't stop headphones from being more spacious sounding than others, though.

 

A good spacial sound will make things more clearer and defined.  Open headphones leak sound naturally so they usually have better soundstage.  M50s have really poor soundstage, and that makes them sound very cluttered and sloppy compared to a lot of other headphones.



really? i thought the m50 soundstage was pretty good imo, but I mean I guess i see this is another place where preference plays a big role kinda just like with presentation, again like the fast clean HD25 or the lethargic laid back M50's 

still I feel like the imaging accuracy could atleast be regarded more in judging sound quality

post #4 of 17

Soundstage is one of the basic elements of 'sound quality'

post #5 of 17
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by zazex View Post

Soundstage is one of the basic elements of 'sound quality'



yeah that's what I think but when I read reviews it doesn't seem as significant, I also feel that it's one of those more obvious things, cause I don't have supper hearing, and I can't tell the quality of headphones apart from each other that much past a certain point, but I, like most others, am very spaciously aware, and I feel like it REALLY enhances the sound quality. I mean one case is the HD25, I think they sound amazing and it's uniformly praised by most head fiers, but I feel like the sound stage is a HUGE handicap for the headphones. 

post #6 of 17

Soundstage in closed headphones is generally not comparable with soundstage in open headphones

Open headphones will win that game almost every time

post #7 of 17

I agree.  Open phones are the way to go on this dimension.

post #8 of 17

It's all about personal preferece. Some focus on the soundstage, some focus on neutrality, some focus on a certain part of the spectrum, others focus the sound as a whole. There are also people who would regard non-SQ issues to be more important, such as comfort, isolation, leakage and looks.

post #9 of 17

To me sound stage = instrument separation

 

To everyone else sound stage = concert like surround feel

 

To me as long as a headphone has good instrument separation it's a good headphone. You really only need an impressive sound stage if you listen to classical. To me the instrument seperation is excellent on the hd 25 1 ii. At least its fine for me. The cans deserve their praise ime. But then again i like my sound to be aggressive and feel like I'm in the center of it. Lets just say i don't care that much about sound stage.

 

My music genre if your wondering is heavy metal.

post #10 of 17

I think instrument separation is related to soundstage, while the general definition of soundstage is the imaging and size.

post #11 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingpage View Post

I think instrument separation is related to soundstage, while the general definition of soundstage is the imaging and size.


Agreed.

 

In speakers as well as headphones

 

post #12 of 17

Instrument separation is a quality of driver speed and decay for me.  It's the ability to make distinctions between different instruments of brass, strings or woodwinds.  The imaging does go a long way in helping sort that out, as well.  But for me, speakers' imaging plays a much larger roll than headphones for that sort of thing.  

 

Yeah the M50's soundstage is kinda bad.  It's more of an 'in-your-head' type of sensation, where a lot of higher end headphones give you out of head sensation.  Never to the point of in front of you like speakers do, but if you get the right recordings-- binaural or not-- with a headphone that's spacious enough, and you'll get a great deal of ambience.  Closed headphones in general don't have good quality in general when it comes to that; Denon D2000 being the best of the closed cans I've heard for soundstage.  You'd have to get an open-backed headphone.

post #13 of 17

Binaural/Dobly headphone/CMSS 3D with some cheap headphone can sound better than good stereo speakers, no?  One is surround, and the other is stereo.

post #14 of 17

Soundstage can have a lot of factors. Yes, being able to isolate each part of the song so you can follow it. There maybe could be too much soundstage.

 

 

The issue is that open headphones do have great soundstage but at the risk of loosing a little PRaT as well as slam. So you have to have all the little parts of the package.

 

 

 

Soundstage is also going to be affected by your source and amp too. The recording process is really the most determining factor affecting soundstage. 

 

 

Some headphones are even going to have a muddy little fog in one area of the soundstage, meaning the whole soundstage is not clear. Or even a character which seems to color the whole soundstage. All these things are not perfect but can be learned to live with if you like the other qualities of the headphones. There is nothing more boring than a narrow soundstage. It can take the life out of a stereo image and make it seem unmoving and dry. At the same time, when done right a soundstage gives the feeling of an alternate musical living space where you can spend a lot of quality time as different things are always moving and changing. 

 

post #15 of 17

Sound stage is hugely important if you want to hear details. It's part of the reason why people use speakers sometimes. The Grado 325i failed to impress in an audition because no matter how well it could produce detail or sound, I couldn't hear it because the the details had no space to breathe.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Role of soundstage in sound quality?